Judas

Harmony #93  What Jesus Provided For Judas (Matthew 26:47-56; Mark 14:43-52; Luke 22:47-53; John 18:2-11)

Before we read this passage, let’s set the scene. It’s Holy Week. Jerusalem is packed with hundreds of thousands of Jewish worshippers. A ”crowd” is going to appear to arrest Jesus, because there has been a history of violent uprising during this week. Considering the way Jesus was greeted when he entered Jerusalem, this has the potential to be explosive. We will see that the crowd has swords and clubs. The weapons suggest Romans (swords) and the Sanhedrin’s guard (clubs). They do NOT want this to get out of hand.


While Jesus was still speaking, suddenly a crowd appeared, and the man named Judas, one of the twelve, was leading them. (Now Judas, the one who handed him over[1], knew the place too, because Jesus had met there many times with his disciples.)

So Judas obtained a squad of soldiers and some officers sent by the chief priests, Pharisees and experts in the law, along with elders of the people. They came to the orchard with lanterns and torches, and armed with swords and clubs.

(Now the one who was handing him over had given them a sign, saying, “The one I kiss is the man. Arrest him and lead him away under guard.”) When Judas arrived, Jesus said to Judas, “Friend,[2] do what you are here to do.” Judas went up to Jesus immediately and said, “Greetings, Rabbi!” and kissed him. But Jesus said to him, “Judas, would you hand over the Son of Man with a kiss?”

There is a lot of conversation about, “Why a kiss?” Judas could have put his arm around Jesus’ shoulder. He could have stood in front and pointed. He could have led Jesus to the arresting crowd. Instead, he kissed him.

Among all the reasons I studied this week, I am leaning most heavily toward the idea that the answer is found in Psalms 2, a coronation hymn that was sung at the inauguration of each new king in the line of David. Based on Jesus’ reception in Jerusalem, the masses of the people clearly thought that’s who he was. If you remember, it’s why Jesus wept. The crowds thought a king like David – A Zealot Messiah and King – was about to defeat Rome and usher in an earthly kingdom that would bring peace through the sword, and Jesus knew they were so tragically wrong. So, how is this coronation psalm related to Judas kissing Jesus? Here is the psalm.

Why do the nations conspire and the peoples plot in vain? The kings of the earth rise up and the rulers band together against the Lord and against his anointed, saying, “Let us break their chains and throw off their shackles.”

The One enthroned in heaven laughs; the Lord scoffs at them. He rebukes them in his anger and terrifies them in his wrath, saying, “I have installed my king on Zion, my holy mountain.”  I will proclaim the Lord’s decree:

He said to me, “You are my son; today I have become your father. Ask me, and I will make the nations your inheritance, the ends of the earth your possession. You will break them with a rod of iron; you will dash them to pieces like pottery.

Therefore, you kings, be wise; be warned, you rulers of the earth. Serve the Lord with fear and celebrate his rule with trembling. Kiss his son, or he will be angry and your way will lead to your destruction, or his wrath can flare up in a moment. Blessed are all who take refuge in him.

I suspect Judas may have been sending more than one signal with that kiss. I wonder if this was a coronation kiss, a signal to Jesus that he believed Jesus was about to be the earthly king in the line of David who was about to break Rome with a rod of iron. It’s a Zealot’s dream. We’ll come back to this in a bit.

Then Jesus, because he knew everything that was going to happen to him, came and asked them, “Who are you looking for?” They replied, “Jesus the Nazarene.” He told them, “I AM.” [3](Now Judas, the one who handed him over, was standing there with them.) So when Jesus said to them, “I AM,” they retreated and fell to the ground.

Then Jesus asked them again, “Who are you looking for?” And they said, “Jesus the Nazarene.” Jesus replied, “I told you that I am he. If you are looking for me, let these men go.” He said this to fulfill the word he had spoken, “I have not lost a single one of those whom you gave me.” Then they came and took hold of Jesus and arrested him.

 When those who were around him saw what was about to happen, they said, “Lord, should we use our swords?” Then Simon Peter, who had a sword, pulled it out and struck the high priest’s slave, cutting off his right ear. (Now the slave’s name was Malchus.[4]) But Jesus said, “Enough of this!” And he touched the man’s ear and healed him.

Then Jesus said to Peter, “Put your sword back in its sheath! For all who take hold of the sword will die by the sword.  Or do you think that I cannot call on my Father, and that he would send me more than twelve legions of angels right now? How then would the scriptures that say it must happen this way be fulfilled? Am I not to drink the cup that the Father has given me?”

Then, at that moment, Jesus said to the crowd, the chief priests, the officers of the temple guard, and the elders who had come out to get him, “Have you come out with swords and clubs to arrest me like you would an outlaw? Day after day I was with you, teaching in the temple courts, yet you did not arrest me.

But this has happened so that the scriptures of the prophets would be fulfilled. This is your hour, and that of the rule of darkness!” Then the squad of soldiers with their commanding officer and the officers of the Jewish leaders arrested Jesus and tied him up. Then all the disciples left him and fled.

 I need to add something from an upcoming text to round out where we are going this morning.

When Judas, who had handed him over, saw that Jesus was condemned, he was seized with remorse and returned the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and the elders.  “I have sinned,” he said, “for I have handed over innocent blood.” “What is that to us?” they replied. “That’s your responsibility.” So Judas threw the money into the temple and left. Then he went away and hanged himself. (Matthew 27:3-5)


Let’s talk about Judas so that we can talk about Jesus.

Judas has an interesting history in church lore. There have been sharply different opinions about him in terms of his motivation in both Jewish and Christian history. Let’s start with the question of whether or not he was ever truly a follower of Jesus. 

  • Judas left all to follow Jesus (Luke 14:33).

  • He picked up his cross (Luke 14:27)

  • He loved Jesus more than his own family (Luke 14:26)

  • Judas cast out devils, healed, and preached (Matthew 10:1-27).

  • John 3:22 notes "After this, Jesus and his disciples went into the region of Judea, where he spent some time with them baptizing." Surely, Jesus would have baptized his disciples if they are baptizing others.

  • Jesus said that Judas’ name was written in the Lamb’s book of life (Luke 10:20).

  • Jesus said that Judas was one of His sheep who’s Father was God  and whose Spirit would speak through him (Matthew 10).

  • Judas would have a throne in Heaven upon which he would judge Israel (Matthew 19:28; Luke 22:30).[5]

  • When Peter said, “WE believe and are sure that you are the Christ, the Son of the living God,” (Matthew 16:16) that “we” included Judas.

 Judas checks all the boxes for someone who genuinely followed Jesus, at least in the terms that we discuss when we talk about what it looks like to become and be a follower of Jesus.

  • A firm belief that Jesus was the Christ, the Messiah, the Son of God sent to save humanity by conquering evil and forgiving sins.

  • A declaration of this belief (in this case, through Peter’s words of what “we” said about Jesus)

  • A baptism in the name of Jesus

  • A choice of Jesus over all others

  • An evangelistic fervor

  • A demonstration of the power of God through the Spirit of God

  • An identification of sheep, with his name in the Book of Life.

I feel pretty good saying Judas was a genuine follower of Jesus. Here’s a trickier question: What was the spiritual fate of Judas after he handed Jesus over to death?

PERSPECTIVE ONE

Judas betrayed Jesus because he did not believe or trust that Jesus really was the Christ, the Son of the Living God, the long -awaited Messiah. His betrayal showed his rejection of Jesus. In this scenario, Judas wanted Jesus arrested and killed because Jesus was now a blasphemer, claiming to be God when he was not. Judas’ kiss, then, was mockery of Jesus. Maybe even calling him Rabbi was a pointed message: “That’s all you are.”

 Judas is the super villain in this perspective, one “Satan entered” to make Judas an adversary and accuser to commit murderous sin. His later anguish happens when he is overwhelmed with guilt for the sin he committed when he realized he was wrong. The follow-up question would almost always be, “Could Judas be in heaven?” Or even, “Would it even have been possible for Judas to have been forgiven and saved?”

PERSPECTIVE TWO

Judas believed in Jesus, just the wrong way. He was a Zealot; he believed Jesus really was the Messiah meant to usher in a Zealot Kingdom of God. He is getting the ball rolling by handing Jesus over. It’s holy week; Jerusalem is packed with hundreds of thousands of Jewish worshippers. This was the time. In this scenario, his kiss was sincere, perhaps even loving. Satan entered into him, but Satan’s work was deception about Jesus’ mission and the urging to do a thing that would end up getting Jesus killed, which Satan was all for.

Judas’ remorse is a result of realizing Jesus waas going to let himself be killed rather than ascend to a throne. (“When he saw that he was condemned, he was seized with remorse”). That wasn’t what he envisioned happening at all. When he realized his terrible mistake, he could not live with himself. In this view, when Jesus on the cross said, “Father, forgive them. They don’t know what they do,” this may well have included Judas.

So, two very different views of Judas. Both have been present in the history of Judaism and Christianity. If nothing else, wrestling with this opens up opportunity for discussion about true discipleship, the nature of forgiveness and redemption, the reality of what kind of Messiah Jesus actually is, etc.

 But there’s more that has been part of this discussion.  

The Apostles' Creed states that Jesus "descended into hell" (a reference to Ephesians 4:9). The very Peter who betrayed Jesus in a different later wrote that the "gospel was preached even to those who are now dead." (1 Peter 4:6). Huh. That would mean Judas saw Christus Victor in the flesh. Meanwhile, there are other verses that reference what Jesus did on Silent Saturday.

For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, to bring you to God. He was put to death in the body but made alive in the Spirit. After being made alive, he went and made proclamation to the imprisoned spirits— to those who were disobedient long ago when God waited patiently in the days of Noah while the ark was being built.”  (1 Peter 3:18-20

"How can someone enter a strong man's house and plunder his goods, unless he first binds the strong man? Then indeed he may plunder his house." (Matthew 12:29) 

“When Jesus ascended up on high, He led captive all that had captured us!” (Ephesians 4:8)

Depending on how you read these passages – and there’s room to rearrange the details – you encounter the question that people have disagreed about for a couple centuries: did Jesus preach to just the righteous dead or everybody? Did Jesus free just the righteous who responded or did he free everybody? Just how thorough was the plundering when he bound the strong man?

This event is referred to in church history as the Harrowing as Hell (technically, the Harrowing of Hades). In life, Jesus plundered Satan’s kingdom (think exorcisms); in his death, Jesus plundered the very heart of Satan’s realm. Like Samson, he did more damage in his death than he did in his life. [6]Colossians 2:15 notes,

“He disarmed the rulers and authorities. He made a public example of them[7], by conquering them in his cross.” (Colossians 2:15)

Eastern teachers such as Clement, Origen, Cyril and John of Damascus said that Christ in Hades preached the gospel to evangelize all the unbelieving dead. Weser, theologians such as Augustine and Tertullian spoke of Christ descending to the lower regions to unite specifically faithful patriarchs and prophets to himself.[8]

The early Christian Church understood that the power of the death of Christ worked backwards in time as well as forwards in time, offering Salvation to all who had ever lived and all who were yet to be born.[9]

The Eastern teachers proposed that Jesus emptied Hades; the Western teachers taught that those already inclined toward righteousness responded. Either way, all heard Jesus proclaim who he was and had a choice to respond to this revelation denied them because they were born too soon.

Next question: Was Judas, who was already there – rescued?  Or put another way, did Jesus’ death make possible a life eternal for even Judas? Was Judas inclined toward righteousness (Scenario B above) or not (Scenario A)?

Depending on how you understand the Harrowing of Hell, you will have different conclusions. I want to point out something that remains relevant no matter where you land. Jesus was on mission to offer a salvation that could save even Judas. Jesus had already told his disciples what God was like as expressed through Jesus.

“Suppose one of you has a hundred sheep and loses one of them. Doesn’t he leave the ninety-nine in the open country and go after the lost sheep until he finds it? And when he finds it, he joyfully puts it on his shoulders  and goes home.  

Jesus had insisted throughout his ministry that this was true.

“And this is the will of Him who sent Me, that I shall lose none of those He has given Me, but raise them up at the last day.” (John 6:39)

I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one will snatch them out of my hand.” (John 10:28)

“I have not lost a single one of those whom you gave me.” (John 18:9)[10]

Judas forgot that Jesus will search for the one lost sheep until he finds them. Jesus does not give up on his sheep, and he already declared Judas a sheep of his. After Judas handed him over, that rescue mission started almost immediately on the cross, an act of cruciform love in which Jesus took the weight of either Judas’ betraying sin or terrible misunderstanding of Jesus, or both.  Whatever evil that was in Judas and whatever evil he did or caused to happen, Jesus took all of that upon himself - and overcame it. Here’s Paul explaining this in 2 Corinthians 5: 

10 For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each of us may receive what is due us for the things done while in the body, whether good or bad.”

This sounds like trouble for Judas. Let’s keep reading. I’m going to skip to verse 17, but I encourage you to read the whole chapter later.

Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, the new creation has come.  The old has gone, the new is here! All this is from God, who reconciled us to himself through Christ and gave us the ministry of reconciliation:  that God was reconciling the world to himself in Christ, not counting people’s sins against them.  

And he has committed to us the message of reconciliation. We are therefore Christ’s ambassadors, as though God were making his appeal through us. We implore you on Christ’s behalf: Be reconciled to God.  God made him who had no sin to be sin for us, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God. 

Judas had a mission field awaiting him in which he could have told of the unbelievable, grace-filled love of Jesus. That was Peter’s testimony, and he publicly denied that he was a follower of Jesus. That was Paul’s testimony, and he killed followers of Jesus. That could have been the testimony of Judas

Rember, the apostle John establish.ed that “Jesus loved them until the end” (John 13:1). Jesus never stopped loving Judas. Jesus was always the father in the story of the Prodigal Son, eager to run and embrace his lost and wandering child. He never stopped being the Great Physician, there to heal all the sick. He established himself as the true Passover Lamb, showing that neither physical or spiritual death would have the last word. The transformative power of cruciform love never stops being offered to those who would have the love of Jesus write their story. 

Within days after Judas handed over Jesus, Jesus made a way for him to be reconciled to God and to become the righteousness of God. Then, Jesus would rise and go to the disciples, calling back into his service all of them hid, who denied that they knew him, who were convinced he was a failed Messiah. He called them all back and restored them, because nothing can separate us from the cruciform love of God. Then, he sent the promised Holy Spirit, because nothing will separate us from the cruciform presence of God. Then, his church will permeate the world, because the cruciform mission of God will salt and light the world. In His death and resurrection, Jesus broke the back of evil. Nothing from Satan’s realm can have dominion over us.

This does not mean I am right, but I admit that I want to believe that Jesus revealed himself in all his cruciform power and love to Judas in Hades and triumphantly marched him out of the devil’s domain and into the Kingdom. It’s hard to imagine a more thorough conquering of the rulers and authorities. The Bible does not clarify what happened, of course. I hope it’s okay that I want to believe that is true.

I’d like us to learn something from Judas. Judas not only misunderstood who Jesus was in terms of his physical impact as the Messiah, Judas did not understand just how loving Jesus was. He seems to have despaired of recovering from what he did. Friends, never despair at the love of Jesus. Don’t underestimate the power of cruciform love. Paul unpacks it in Romans 8. 

If the Spirit of God is leading you, then take comfort in knowing you are His children… The Spirit you have received adopts you and welcomes you into God’s own family. That’s why we call out to Him, “Abba! Father!” as we would address a loving daddy…If we are God’s children, that means we are His heirs along with the Anointed, set to inherit everything that is His. 

If we share His sufferings, we know that we will ultimately share in His glory. Now I’m sure of this: the sufferings we endure now are not even worth comparing to the glory that is coming and will be revealed in us.  For all of creation is waiting, yearning for the time when the children of God will be revealed… 

And there is more; it’s not just creation—all of us are groaning together too. Though we have already tasted the firstfruits of the Spirit, we are longing for the total redemption of our bodies that comes when our adoption as children of God is complete— for we have been saved in this hope and for this future…

We are confident that God is able to orchestrate everything to work toward something good and beautiful when we love Him and accept His invitation to live according to His plan… So what should we say about all of this? If God is on our side, then tell me: whom should we fear? 

If He did not spare His own Son, but handed Him over on our account, then don’t you think that He will graciously give us all things with Him… Jesus the Anointed died, but more importantly, conquered death when He was raised to sit at the right hand of God, where He pleads on our behalf. 

So who can separate us? What can come between us and the love of God’s Anointed? Can troubles, hardships, persecution, hunger, poverty, danger, or even death? The answer is, absolutely nothing… But no matter what comes, we will always taste victory through Him who loved us. 

For I have every confidence that nothing—not death, life, heavenly messengers, dark spirits, the present, the future, spiritual powers, height, depth, nor any created thing—can come between us and the love of God revealed in the Anointed, Jesus our Lord.


_____________________________________________________________________________

[1] I am choosing translations that use “handed him over” instead of betrayed. As best I can tell, it’s a better translation. It does not imply intent; it simply addresses actions. The only time the original word is used outside of the Gethsemene accounts is in Acts 22:4, which is translated overwhelmingly this way: “I persecuted this Way to the death, binding and delivering (betraying) into prisons both men and women.” Here, it is clearly a handing over.

[2] Commentaries are really mixed concerning whether or not this is to be read at face value  (Judas is a “friend, a companion or acquaintance”) or if it’s an ironic title highlighting the Judas is not what he claimed to be. This word occurs only three times in the New Testament. The other two places are Matthew 22:12 and Matthew 20:13. You can read how ‘friend’ is used there and see what you think. 

[3] “The use of "εἰμί" in the Septuagint (the Greek translation of the Old Testament) often translates the Hebrew verb "הָיָה" (hayah), which is used in God's self-revelation to Moses as "I AM" (Exodus 3:14). This connection underscores the theological depth of "εἰμί" in expressing divine existence and presence.” (Strong’s Lexicon) “he "I am formula (Gk egō eimi)" harks back to God's only name, "Yahweh" (OT/3068, "the lord") – meaning "He who always was, is, and will be." (HELPS Word Studies)

[4] John recorded this detail. Most people assume this was John’s way of letting people know how they could double-check this account. Ask Malchus what happened.

[5] Did he mean Judas, or would that 12th throne be for Matthias (who takes Judas’ place as recorded in the book of Acts). Opinions vary.

[6] https://prodigalprof.com/creed-or-chaos/19-he-descended-into-hell/

[7] That public example seems to reference what Roman conquerors would do when they returned from battle, parading their captives down the middle of the town.

[8] https://billmuehlenberg.com/2018/03/27/he-descended-into-hell/

[9] https://prodigalprof.com/creed-or-chaos/19-he-descended-into-hell/

[10] Then there is this: “I protected them by the power of the name you gave me. I guarded them so that not one was lost, except the one headed for destruction, as the Scriptures foretold.” (John 17:12) I suspect this refers to Judas “disqualifying himself from the race” (as Paul warned about) and then literally ending his life. In the reading of Judas as terribly misguided Zealot who actually did believe Jesus was the Messiah who needed a push to ascend to his throne, no one snatched him out of Jesus’ hand. God gave Jesus that sheep. Jesus never let go.

Harmony #78: Mary, Martha, and Jesus (John 11:55-12:11; Matthew 26:6-16; Mark 14:3-11; Luke 10: 38-42)

Have you heard the phrase, “Can’t see the forest for all of the trees?” Today’s passage has a lot of trees. We will look at them first, because those trees have something to offer, and then the forest, because the Big Picture matters.

Now the Jewish feast of Passover was near, and many people went up to Jerusalem from the rural areas before the Passover to cleanse themselves ritually. Thus they were looking for Jesus, and saying to one another as they stood in the temple courts,“What do you think? That he won’t come to the feast?” Now the chief priests and the Pharisees had given orders that anyone who knew where Jesus was should report it, so that they could arrest him.

Then, six days before the Passover, Jesus came to Bethany, where Lazarus lived, whom he had raised from the dead. While Jesus was in Bethany at the house of Simon the leper, they prepared a dinner for him there. Lazarus was among those present at the table with him. Martha was serving, distracted with all the preparations she had to make, while her sister Mary sat at the Lord’s feet and listened to what he said. Martha came up to him and said, “Lord, don’t you care that my sister has left me to do all the work alone? Tell her to help me.”

But the Lord answered her, “Martha, Martha, you are worried and troubled about many things, but one thing is needed. Mary has chosen the best part; it will not be taken away from her.”

This incident apparently happens after Lazarus was raised from the dead. Martha is doing what anyone would do who had a distinguished guest: seeking to honor him by taking care of him. I mean, HE RAISED HER BROTHER FROM THE DEAD.

This was crucial. When Jesus talks with her, his approach suggests he is not mad or scolding. He may even be saying, “I see how much you are worried about honoring me well.” Mary “chose the best part,” as if what Martha chose was good, but not the highest good in that moment.[1]

Today, we might reference a personality test or a love language test to explain their different responses to Jesus. “Oh, Martha is acts of service. Mary is quality time.” Jesus, who knows how to love well, speaks their love language.  What did Jesus give Mary? Quality time. What did and will Jesus give Mary in raising Lazarus and dying on the cross? Acts of service. So I don’t think this is a blanket criticism of Martha. There’s something about the moment, the timing, the opportunity right in front of her.

I wonder if this has something to tell us about “be with” Jesus contrasted with “do for” Jesus. Both are good, but neither is a template for every moment. In that moment, it was better to “be with.”

We must remember that there is a place for “be with” and “do for” as we follow Jesus. Both honor Jesus. Both have an important place. We want to be with Jesus and live for Jesus, right? He’s going to give all the disciples marching orders when he leaves; he’s already sent them out on short missions. “Do for” is a good thing, but it’s not the only thing, and it can’t be isolated from “be with.”

It’s hard not to judge when we see others leaning into one approach when we really like the other. Martha thinks Mary should be “doing for” Jesus just like her, but that wasn’t true. Mary was in the right place. It’s easy to think the focus we choose (doing or being) is THE RIGHT WAY FOR EVERYBODY, but…we don’t know that to be true.


Sometimes, I need to do things for my wife: the dishes, put away my laundry, fix that sink, make smoked wings for the Ohio State game, give her my receipts from Menards so we can get that 11% back. Sometimes, I need to just be with her: watching The Great British Bake-off together, going on a date, collecting rocks at Point Betsie, going to the fair, watching Florida State football so she has a shoulder to cry on.

Both matter.

“Be with” and “do for” are intertwined when you love somebody. So, I think Mary and Martha show us two legitimate responses to Jesus. I wish I knew where to land this plane, but I don’t. Maybe this is a good topic to pursue during lunch today.

Then Mary came with an alabaster jar[2] of three quarters of a pound of expensive aromatic oil from pure nard.[3]After breaking open the jar, she poured it on his head[4] and anointed his feet, as Jesus was at the table. She then wiped his feet dry with her hair. (Now the house was filled with the fragrance of the perfumed oil.)

The Jewish people put nard on those who died to mask the smell, because there was a process of interring the body that lasted long enough to make you want to use nard. In the next paragraph, Jesus will affirm that she was, indeed, preparing him for his burial.[5]

Worth noting: nard in an alabaster jar like this was shipped in from a place that harvested (?) the nard before bottling it and sealing it. This bottle cost a year’s average wages. This bottle represented a plan for someone in the family of Mary. I wonder if it was what they had planned to use for Lazarus, but then didn’t need to. Or… Jesus will say shortly of Mary, “She did what she could.” I wonder if this was set aside for her?

And wiping his feet with her hair? It was unheard of for a Jewish woman to let her hair down in public, let alone wash the feet of a man not her husband, let alone with her hair. There is something going on here, but I am still working on this. This is the second time a woman has dried Jesus’ feet with her hair. (Luke 7)[6]

Whatever the case, Mary communicated something important: she believed Jesus when he said he was going to die. I doubt she anticipated crucifixion, as Jesus was not a Zealot, but she may have been connecting the dots and concluding that she wouldn’t be able to do this later. As Jesus points out, she was honoring him while she could.

Out of love, honor and the knowledge that “the end” was near for Jesus, she offered the lock of her hair with willing abandon to the one who is about to die in order to win the battle on behalf of a world that God loves. Bless the Lord.

But some who were present indignantly said to one another, “Why this waste of expensive ointment? It could have been sold at a high price and the money given to the poor!” So they spoke angrily to her. Judas Iscariot, one of his disciples (the one who was going to betray him) said, “Why wasn’t this oil sold for three hundred silver coins and the money given to the poor?” (Now Judas said this not because he was concerned about the poor, but because he was a thief. As keeper of the money box, he used to steal what was put into it.)

When Jesus learned of this, he said to them, “Leave her alone. Why are you bothering her? She has done a good service for me. For you will always have the poor with you,[7] and you can do good for them whenever you want. You will not always have me! She did what she could. When she poured this oil on my body, she did it to anoint my body beforehand and prepare me for the day of my burial. I tell you the truth, wherever this gospel is proclaimed in the whole world, what she has done will also be told in memory of her.”

In Matthew’s account of this story, Jesus had just taught them about reward and punishment related to caring for the needy (25:3146). He concluded with, “Whatever you do to the least of these you do to me.” So it makes sense this was in the front of the disciple’s minds.

Jesus’ response pointed them back to the Torah. They were commanded to take care of the poor; Deuteronomy 15 uses the exact phrase Jesus used. This would probably remind them of not just all the teaching in Deuteronomy 15, but of all the times God told his people to care for the poor. It was baked into the rhythm of their lives. In fact, if they did everything the Old Testament commanded, it would be difficult for someone to remain poor in Israel.

  • debts were forgiven every 7 years (Deuteronomy 15)

  • land was returned every 50 years (Leviticus 25)

  • food was shared (Proverbs 22:9)

  • indebted servants were set free with provision after 7 years (Deuteronomy 15)

  • the edges of their fields were left for the poor to harvest (Leviticus 23:22)

  • fields were unplanted every 7 years so the poor could harvest volunteer plants (Leviticus 25)

  • they were to “open their hand wide” to the poor (Deuteronomy 15:11)

  • they were to practice generous giving (Psalm 37:21; Proverbs 14:21)

Bottom line: the disciples were not wrong in principle,[8] but in this moment they were wrong in practice. If Mary was preparing him for burial, she should not be criticized any more than we would criticize someone for purchasing a coffin for a loved one, even though there are poor that could be fed with that money.

Then one of the Twelve—the one called Judas Iscariot—went to the chief priests and asked, “What are you willing to give me if I deliver him over to you?” So they counted out for him thirty pieces of silver. From then on Judas watched for an opportunity to hand him over.

This is when Judas snaps. Different people have offered different reasons since the text leaves space to fill in the blanks.

  • I noted last week that I suspect Judas was looking to spark an insurrection. Jesus has apparently resigned himself to die. Dead men can’t be kings. Let’s get this king on the throne before he dies!  Time to start the fight!

  • Or….Judas knows Jesus raised Lazarus from the dead. Huge crowds were there because the word had gotten out. Maybe Judas thought there was nothing to worry about. Get the fight started; Jesus will be fine!

  • Or… Judas betrayed Jesus because he had stopped believing in him. Something about what happened here convinced him not to back Jesus anymore.

 Whatever the reason, it’s interesting that this is incident that is the last straw for Judas. Meanwhile, the 30 pieces of silver he received has precedence.

  • Exodus 21 demands this as payment if a slave is gored to death by a bull. So, perhaps we could think of this as the Sadducees giving Judas recompense for the person they are about to kill.

  • 30 pieces of silver was also the wage paid to the reliable shepherd of God’s people in Zechariah 11,[9] a passage that also talks about throwing the money to a potter. Hmmm. 

These Old Testament connections are, in fact, both true.  Jesus is a duolos, a servant or slave depending on the translation you use. 

[Jesus], being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage; rather, he made himself nothing by taking the very nature of a servant/slave (duolos), being made in human likeness. And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to death, even death on a cross! (Philippians 2) 

And, Jesus is a shepherd. 

“I am the good shepherd; I know my sheep and my sheep know me, just as the Father knows me and I know the Father—and I lay down my life for the sheep.” (John 10:14-15) 

Alright, let’s step back from the trees and look at the forest. There is this nagging voice in my head that insists there is a contrast going on, not of a good and bad thing but of a good and better thing. I’m not quite sure how to put words to it.

  • The place for the practical (Martha) and the prophetic (Mary)

  • The practice of stewardship by fasting (taking care of the poor) and feasting (honoring and celebrating)

  • The ‘do for’ (Martha) and the ‘be with’ (Mary)

  • Prudence (provision budgeted for charity) and extravagance (provision budgeted for honoring)

I wonder if we are supposed to be reminded that in the midst of a discipleship that is often characterized by prudence and the stewardship of fasting that includes setting up a budget from which we give generously from our resources to those in need, there is always going to be a place in the Kingdom of God for extravagant honor.[10] 

In this case, we see it bestowed on Jesus, and rightfully so. In Mary’s case, it’s an act of worship for Jesus. The King will be honored as a King. Bless the Lord with the best that you have. We can’t honor the physical Jesus like Mary did, but surely this challenges us to ask ourselves if Jesus is honored by the worshipful sacrifices that we do give.

I wonder if we are supposed to be thinking about how to honor the children of the King, too. We can become so caught up in fixing what’s broken in the world that we forget to celebrate what’s right in the world. Like Mary and Martha, this is not either/or. It’s both/and.  

God wants his people to learn how to honor what is good through celebration. God wants his people to know how to throw a righteous party that reminds people that they are precious, valuable and loved, not only by God but by God’s people.

  • When I turned 50, friends threw me a party that was wonderfully extravagant. I still think about it. I have posters on my wall from it.

  • I have helped friends with projects this summer, and they paid me wages that made me consider that I had undervalued myself.

  • I have friends who bless us from their abundance by letting us stay for free in a wonderful Air B and B that brings us rest.

Helping those who are financial impoverish matters. Generous charity should be baked into the rhythm of our lives. But at times, extravagant celebration can be huge for those who are emotionally and mentally impoverished, struggling with all kinds of inner battles, desperately needing provision and rest of a different kind.

It’s the one to whom Jesus said, “Come to me, all you who are weary and heavy laden, and I will give you rest.” The Holy Spirit ministers in ways we never could; sometimes, gifts that cost time and money remind people that they matter not just in God’s eyes but in the eyes of God’s people. And some days, that’s a game changer, maybe even a life saver.

During our potluck, let’s feast together today in a way that shows the depth and breadth of God’s provision. Let the abundance of food remind us that we all need to experience an abundance of honor, or friendship, of community that reminds us constantly of the value of the imago dei, the image of God in us all.

_________________________________________________________________

[1] “Chosen the good part—not in the general sense of Moses' choice (Heb 11:25), and Joshua's (Jos 24:15), and David's (Ps 119:30); that is, of good in opposition to bad; but, of two good ways of serving and pleasing the Lord, choosing the better.” (Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary)

[2] “The vessel is likely a long-necked flask made of translucent, finely carved stone standing some five to ten inches high. The perfume is pure nard (see Mark 14:3John 12:3), an oil extracted from the root of the nard plant grown in India. This is not a typical household oil for anointing, but an expensive perfume oil used for a solemn and special act of devotion. By breaking the flask Mary…is performing the highest act of consecration to Jesus, even to the anointing of his feet (cf. John 12:3).” (Zondervan Illustrated Bible Backgrounds of the New Testament)

[3] An average year’s wages.

[4] “Such long-necked containers have been found in tombs from this period near Jerusalem; people apparently lavished the ointment on deceased loved ones. This expensive perfume may have been planned for a funeral, either a future one or one canceled because of Jesus’ healing ministry. Providing a guest with oil to anoint his head could be simple courtesy, but one could also anoint a king in this way (2Ki 9:6).” (NIV Cultural Backgrounds Study Bible)

[5] “The anointing…"prepares" him for his burial after dying the death of a criminal, for only in that circumstance would the customary anointing of the body be omitted.” (Expositor’s Bible Commentary) 

[6] Because so much of Jesus’ life and teaching refers back to the Old Testament, here’s a thought. Judges records that after a woman named Jael killed the Canaanite general who was attacking Israel, the Israelites defeated Canaan. The judge at the time, Deborah, and her general, Barak, wrote this song: “When the locks of the women are long in Israel, when the people offer themselves with willing abandon - bless the LORD!  –Judges 4:18–5:2”  Read more at “Extravagant Worship: Mary Washing Jesus’ Feet.” Fruitfullywomen.com

[7] “There will always be poor people in the land. Therefore I command you to be openhanded toward your fellow Israelites who are poor and needy in your land.” (Deuteronomy 15:11)

[8] This is how one of the early Church Fathers thought of this scenario. “If anyone had asked Christ before the woman did this, He would not have approved it. But after she had done it, He looks only to the gift itself. For after the fragrant oil had been poured, what good was a rebuke? Likewise, if you should see anyone providing a sacred vessel or ornament for the walls of the church, do not spoil his zeal. But if beforehand he asks about it, command him to give instead to the poor.” (John Chrysostom, quoted in the Orthodox Study Bible)

[9] I told them “If you think it best, give me my pay; but if not, keep it.” So they paid me thirty pieces of silver. And the Lord said to me, “Throw it to the potter”—the handsome price at which they valued me! So I took the thirty pieces of silver and threw them to the potter at the house of the Lord.” (Zechariah 11: 12-13)

[10] I’m thinking now of Ecclesiastes: “There is a time for everything, and a season for every activity under the heavens: a time to be born, to die, to plant, to uproot, to kill, to heal, to tear down, to build, to weep, to laugh, to mourn, to dance, to scatter stones, to gather them, to embrace, to refrain from embracing, to search, to give up, to keep, to throw away, to tear, to mend, to be silent, to speak, to love, to hate, for war and for peace.”