The Acts of  Evangelicals

Well, we made it through another election. As was the case two years ago, I suspect some of you are pleased about the results and others are disappointed. I think we are all happy that the political commercials have finally stopped, and our mailboxes don’t give us so much material to start campfires.

This week, I was thinking about how, in my lifetime, pretty much every two years the tide changes color. A party with its people and priorities gets elected; usually, two years later there is some kind of reactionary vote, and a different party with its people and priorities gains power. Two years later, the tide changes color again….

When the ship of state moves that much, it can feel destabilizing, confusing, maybe even anxiety-inducing as we wonder what will happen in the next two years, then in the election two years from now. #changeyetagain

But we have an anchor. As always, whoever won the election, Jesus is still Lord. The results of an election may change who's in charge of the government, but they don't change who's in charge of the Kingdom of God. That means our calling as followers of Jesus hasn't changed either. Our call to be like Jesus stays steady. None of our Kingdom commitments change when the political landscape turns red or blue.

Two weeks ago, we talked about three important aspects of Christian discipleship: orthodoxy (right belief), orthopathy (righteous emotions), and orthopraxy (righteous actions). Last week, Paul reminded us that our character matters. The soul and the skin are connected. What we believe and what we love become visible in how we live.

God’s promise to complete the work He has begun in us by His Holy Spirit and through the death and resurrection of Jesus is the anchor, the through line. Transformation. Christlikeness. Ambassadorship. Ministers of reconciliation. Love God and love others. This grounds us and centers us.

Next week, we're returning to the book of Acts – literally about how the apostles and the early church acted. Before we do, I want to share some of what I was studying during my sabbatical which gave rise to the title of this sermon: “The Acts of Evangelicals.”

During my lifetime, evangelical leaders from around the world have been writing declarations about what it means to follow Jesus. Across generations, cultures, political administrations, and changing social controversies, they kept returning to many of the same convictions. I read:

·      Chicago Declaration of Evangelical Social Concern (1973)

·      Lausanne Covenant (1974)

·      The Consultation on the Church in Response to Human Need, 1983,

·      Manila Manifesto (1989)

·      Amsterdam Declaration (2000)

·      Health Of Our Nation (2004)

·       Evangelical Manifesto of 2008

·       Capetown Commitment (2010)

·      For the Health of our Nation (2018)

·      The Seoul Statement (2024)

While these declarations are certainly not inspired Scripture, they do seek to be faithful to Scripture. I think there's value in listening to what evangelical leadership across (literally) generations and cultures have consistently said about the implications of following Jesus. They represent the biblical and moral ecosystem in which many of us were raised, and in which this church was founded and continues to exist.[1]

(Other than the first one, which you can read in its entirety, I am excerpting portions related to orthopraxy and orthopathy that I hope give a representative overview.)

* * * * *

In 1973, around 50 evangelical leaders, notably Ron Sider, John Perkins, Carl F.H. Henry and Jim Wallis (who were theologically conservative and liberal), published the “Chicago Declaration of Evangelical Social Concern”.  Here are some excerpts.

A DECLARATION OF EVANGELICAL SOCIAL CONCERN 

As evangelical Christians committed to the Lord Jesus Christ and the full authority of the Word of God, we affirm that God lays total claim upon the lives of his people. We cannot, therefore, separate our lives in Christ from the situation in which God has placed us in the United States and the world.

We confess that we have not acknowledged the complete claims of God on our lives. We acknowledge that God requires love. But we have not demonstrated the love of God to those suffering social abuses.

We acknowledge that God requires justice. But we have not proclaimed or demonstrated his justice to an unjust American society. Although the Lord calls us to defend the social and economic rights of the poor and the oppressed, we have mostly remained silent. We deplore the historic involvement of the church in America with racism and the conspicuous responsibility of the evangelical community for perpetuating the personal attitudes and institutional structures that have divided the body of Christ along color lines. Further, we have failed to condemn the exploitation of racism at home and abroad by our economic system.

We affirm that God abounds in mercy and that he forgives all who repent and turn from their sins. So we call our fellow evangelical Christians to demonstrate repentance in a Christian discipleship that confronts the social and political injustice of our nation.

We must attack the materialism of our culture and the maldistribution of the nation's wealth and services. We recognize that as a nation we play a crucial role in the imbalance and injustice of international trade and development. Before God and a billion hungry neighbors, we must rethink our values regarding our present standard of living and promote more just acquisition and distribution of the world's resources.

We acknowledge our Christian responsibilities of citizenship. Therefore, we must challenge our misplaced trust of the nation in economic and military might – a proud trust that promotes a national pathology of war and violence which victimizes our neighbors at home and abroad. We must resist the temptation to make the nation and its institutions objects of near-religious loyalty.

We acknowledge that we have encouraged men to prideful domination and women to irresponsible passivity. So we call both men and women to mutual submission and active discipleship.

We proclaim no new gospel, but the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ who, through the power of the Holy Spirit, frees people from sin so that they might praise God through works of righteousness.

By this declaration, we endorse no political ideology or party, but call our nation's leaders and people to that righteousness which exalts a nation. We make this declaration in the biblical hope that Christ is coming to consummate the Kingdom and we accept his claim on our total discipleship till He comes.

They are painting with broad brush strokes, to be sure, but others will use a finer brush.

One year later, in 1974, 2,300 evangelicals from 150 nations crafted the Lausanne Covenant, with a focus on Christian mission that blends evangelism with social responsibility. This is going to be updated over the years, so I will give you some foundational principles here and look at details later.

We affirm that God is both the Creator and the Judge of all men. We therefore should share his concern for justice and reconciliation throughout human society and for the liberation of men and women from every kind of oppression. Because men and women are made in the image of God, every person, regardless of race, religion, colour, culture, class, sex or age, has an intrinsic dignity because of which he or she should be respected and served, not exploited….

Although reconciliation with other people is not reconciliation with God, nor is social action evangelism, nor is political liberation salvation, nevertheless we affirm that evangelism and socio-political involvement are both part of our Christian duty. For both are necessary expressions of our doctrines of God and Man, our love for our neighbour and our obedience to Jesus Christ. The message of salvation implies also a message of judgment upon every form of alienation, oppression and discrimination, and we should not be afraid to denounce evil and injustice wherever they exist… Faith without works is dead…

The development of strategies for world evangelization calls for imaginative pioneering methods. Under God, the result will be the rise of churches deeply rooted in Christ and closely related to their culture. Culture must always be tested and judged by Scripture. Because men and women are God’s creatures, some of their culture is rich in beauty and goodness. Because they are fallen, all of it is tainted with sin and some of it is demonic. The gospel does not presuppose the superiority of any culture to another, but evaluates all cultures according to its own criteria of truth and righteousness, and insists on moral absolutes in every culture...

The Manila Manifesto (1989) was produced and drafted by the British evangelical pastor and theologian John Stott, then finished by a task force of church leaders from around the world in Manila, including Billy Graham. It was overwhelmingly approved by over 4,000 participants from roughly 170 nations,[2] then published in 12 languages. A couple highlights:

Twenty-one Affirmations of the Manila Manifesto

1..We affirm our continuing commitment to The Lausanne Covenant as the basis of our cooperation in the Lausanne Movement.

2. We affirm that in the Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments God has given us an authoritative disclosure of his character and will, his redemptive acts and their meaning, and his mandate for mission.

3.We affirm that the biblical gospel is God’s enduring message to our world, and we determine to defend, proclaim, and embody it.

4.We affirm that human beings, though created in the image of God, are sinful and guilty, and lost without Christ, and that this truth is a necessary preliminary to the gospel.

5.We affirm that the Jesus of history and the Christ of glory are the same person, and that this Jesus Christ is absolutely unique, for he alone is God incarnate, our sin-bearer, the conqueror of death and the coming judge.

6.We affirm that on the cross Jesus Christ took our place, bore our sins and died our death; and that for this reason alone God freely forgives those who are brought to repentance and faith.

7.We affirm that other religions and ideologies are not alternative paths to God, and that human spirituality, if unredeemed by Christ, leads not to God but to judgment, for Christ is the only way.

8.We affirm that we must demonstrate God’s love visibly by caring for those who are deprived of justice, dignity, food, and shelter.

9.We affirm that the proclamation of God’s kingdom of justice and peace demands the denunciation of all injustice and oppression, both personal and structural; we will not shrink from this prophetic witness.

10.We affirm that the Holy Spirit’s witness to Christ is indispensable to evangelism, and that without this supernatural work neither new birth nor new life is possible.

11.We affirm that spiritual warfare demands spiritual weapons, and that we must both preach the Word in the power of the Spirit, and pray constantly that we may enter into Christ’s victory over the principalities and powers of evil.

12.We affirm that God has committed to the whole church and every member of it the task of making Christ known throughout the world; we long to see all lay and ordained persons mobilized and trained for this task.

13.We affirm that we who claim to be members of the body of Christ must transcend within our fellowship the barriers of race, gender, and class.

14.We affirm that the gifts of the Spirit are distributed to all God’s people, women and men, and that their partnership in evangelization must be welcomed for the common good.

15.We affirm that we who proclaim the gospel must exemplify it in a life of holiness and love; otherwise our testimony loses its credibility.

16.We affirm that every Christian congregation must turn itself outward to its local community in evangelistic witness and compassionate service.

17.We affirm the urgent need for churches, mission agencies, and other Christian organizations to cooperate in evangelism and social action, repudiating competition and avoiding duplication.

18.We affirm our duty to study the society in which we live, in order to understand its structures, values and needs, and so develop an appropriate strategy of mission.

19.We affirm that world evangelization is urgent and that the reaching of unreached peoples is possible. So we resolve during the last decade of the twentieth century to give ourselves to these tasks with fresh determination.

20.We affirm our solidarity with those who suffer for the gospel, and will seek to prepare ourselves for the same possibility. We will also work for religious and political freedom everywhere.

21.We affirm that God is calling the whole church to take the whole gospel to the whole world. So we determine to proclaim it faithfully, urgently, and sacrificially until he comes.

From Article 4, “The Gospel And Social Responsibility”

Evangelism is primary because our chief concern is with the gospel, that all people may have the opportunity to accept Jesus Christ as Lord and Saviour. Yet Jesus not only proclaimed the kingdom of God, he also demonstrated its arrival by works of mercy and power. We are called today to a similar integration of words and deeds. In a spirit of humility we are to preach and teach, minister to the sick, feed the hungry, care for prisoners, help the disadvantaged and handicapped, and deliver the oppressed. While we acknowledge the diversity of spiritual gifts, callings, and contexts, we also affirm that good news and good works are inseparable.

The proclamation of God’s kingdom necessarily demands the prophetic denunciation of all that is incompatible with it. Among the evils we deplore are destructive violence, including institutionalized violence, political corruption, all forms of exploitation of people and of the earth, the undermining of the family, abortion on demand, the drug traffic, and the abuse of human rights. In our concern for the poor, we are distressed by the burden of debt in the two-thirds world. We are also outraged by the inhuman conditions in which millions live, who bear God’s image as we do.

Our continuing commitment to social action is not a confusion of the kingdom of God with a Christianized society. It is, rather, a recognition that the biblical gospel has inescapable social implications. True mission should always be incarnational. It necessitates entering humbly into other people’s worlds, identifying with their social reality, their sorrow and suffering, and their struggles for justice against oppressive powers. This cannot be done without personal sacrifices.

Article 7, “The Integrity Of The Witness”

Nothing commends the gospel more eloquently than a transformed life, and nothing brings it into disrepute so much as personal inconsistency. We are charged to behave in a manner that is worthy of the gospel of Christ, and even to “adorn” it, enhancing its beauty by holy lives. For the watching world rightly seeks evidence to substantiate the claims which Christ’s disciples make for him. A strong evidence is our integrity.

Our proclamation that Christ died to bring us to God appeals to people who are spiritually thirsty, but they will not believe us if we give no evidence of knowing the living God ourselves, or if our public worship lacks reality and relevance.

Our message that Christ reconciles alienated people to each other rings true only if we are seen to love and forgive one another, to serve others in humility, and to reach out beyond our own community in compassionate, costly ministry to the needy.

Our challenge to others to deny themselves, take up their cross and follow Christ will be plausible only if we ourselves have evidently died to selfish ambition, dishonesty, and covetousness, and are living a life of simplicity, contentment, and generosity.

We deplore the failures in Christian consistency which we see in both Christians and churches: material greed, professional pride and rivalry, competition in Christian service, jealousy of younger leaders, missionary paternalism, the lack of mutual accountability, the loss of Christian standards of sexuality, and racial, social, and sexual discrimination. All this is worldliness, allowing the prevailing culture to subvert the church instead of the church challenging and changing the culture. We are deeply ashamed of the times when, both as individuals and in our Christian communities, we have affirmed Christ in word and denied him in deed. Our inconsistency deprives our witness of credibility. We acknowledge our continuing struggles and failures. But we also determine by God’s grace to develop integrity in ourselves and in the church.

From Article 12, “Difficult Situation”

First, Christians are loyal citizens, who seek the welfare of their nation. They pray for its leaders, and pay their taxes. Of course, those who have confessed Jesus as Lord cannot also call other authorities Lord, and if commanded to do so, or to do anything which God forbids, must disobey. But they are conscientious citizens. They also contribute to their country’s well-being by the stability of their marriages and their homes, their honesty in business, their hard work, and their voluntary activity in the service of the handicapped and needy. Just governments have nothing to fear from Christians.

Secondly, Christians renounce unworthy methods of evangelism. Though the nature of our faith requires us to share the gospel with others, our practice is to make an open and honest statement of it, which leaves the hearers entirely free to make up their own minds about it. We wish to be sensitive to those of other faiths, and we reject any approach that seeks to force conversion on them.

Thirdly, Christians earnestly desire freedom of religion for all people, not just freedom for Christianity. In predominantly Christian countries, Christians are at the forefront of those who demand freedom for religious minorities. In predominantly non-Christian countries, therefore, Christians are asking for themselves no more than they demand for others in similar circumstances. The freedom to ‘profess, practice, and propagate’ religion, as defined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, could and should surely be a reciprocally granted right.

We greatly regret any unworthy witness of which followers of Jesus may have been guilty. We determine to give no unnecessary offense in anything, lest the name of Christ be dishonored

Eleven years later, in 2000, Billy Graham brought together hundreds of international Christian leaders and evangelists from 8 nations to produce the Amsterdam Declaration. Before its final release, the text was collectively reviewed and shaped by hundreds of international Christian leaders representing the 10,000+ delegates from over 200 countries in attendance. Here are some highlights relevant to our focus.

Religious Pluralism and Evangelism

…In this global village of competing faiths and many world religions, it is important that our evangelism be marked both by faithfulness to the good news of Christ and humility in our delivery of it. Because God's general revelation extends to all points of his creation, there may well be traces of truth, beauty and goodness in many non- Christian belief systems. But we have no warrant for regarding any of these as alternative gospels or separate roads to salvation. The only way to know God in peace, love and joy is through the reconciling death of Jesus Christ the risen Lord. As we share this message with others, we must do so with love and humility, shunning all arrogance, hostility and disrespect. As we enter into dialogue with adherents of other religions, we must be courteous and kind. But such dialogue must not be a substitute for proclamation. Yet because all persons are made in the image of God, we must advocate religious liberty and human rights for all. (Romans 1:18-20; John 14:6; Acts 4:12; Mark 10:41-45; James 1:20; Genesis 1:26)

Although evangelism is not advocacy of any social program, it does entail social responsibility for at least two reasons. First, the gospel proclaims the kingship of the loving Creator who is committed to justice, to human life and the welfare of his creation. So evangelism will need to be accompanied by obedience to God's command to work for the good of all in a way that is fitting for the children of the Father who makes his sun shine on the evil and the good and sends his rain on the righteous and the unrighteous alike.

Second, when our evangelism is linked with concern to alleviate poverty, uphold justice, oppose abuses of secular and economic power, stand against racism, and advance responsible stewardship of the global environment, it reflects the compassion of Christ and may gain an acceptance it would not otherwise receive. (Psalm 47:7; 1 Timothy 6:15; Revelation 17:14; Galatians 6:10; Matthew 5:45; Deuteronomy 24:10-13, 14- 15; Luke 1:52-53, 4:18-19; James 5:1-6)


The National Evangelical Association released “For The Health of Our Nation” in 2004. The declaration restates what was and continues to be conservative evangelical perspectives on marriage, sexuality, and abortion while expanding the principles in ways you might not be used to hearing.

Because God created human beings in his image, every human life from conception to death bears the image of God and has inestimable worth (Genesis 1:27). Therefore, Christians must be committed to a consistent ethic of life that safeguards the essential nature of human life at all stages, with a special concern to protect the lives of the most vulnerable. The unborn, the very young, the aged, those living in poverty, the chronically or terminally ill, those with disabilities and those with genetic diseases deserve our particular care and protection. Our public policy agenda should reflect these broad commitments.

Good family life is so important to healthy human functioning that we oppose government efforts to trespass on the integrity of the family; for example, by encroaching on parental responsibilities and rights to educate their children, separating nuclear families through deportation or creating economic disincentives to marriage. Similarly, labor, housing, healthcare, tax, immigration and education policies concern not only individuals but can significantly affect families. We commit ourselves to work for laws that protect and foster family life. Violations of the integrity of the family threaten public order. In order to strengthen the family, we must promote biblical moral principles, responsible personal choices and wise public policies.

The declaration also had a lot to say about how our faith ought to be expressed in very practical ways to those around us.

We work to protect religious freedom and liberty of conscience.

God has ordained the two co-existing institutions of church and state as distinct and independent of each other with each having its own areas of responsibility (Rom. 13:1-7; Mark 12:13-17; Eph. 4:15-16, 5:23-32). We affirm the principles of religious freedom and liberty of conscience... As God allows the wheat and tares to grow together until the harvest, and as God sends the rain on the just and on the unjust, so those who obey and those who disobey God coexist in society and share in its blessings (Matt. 5:45, 13:24-30). This “gospel pluralism” is foundational to the religious liberty of all….

We work to nurture family life and protect children

Because the family is so important to society, violations of its integrity threaten public order. Similarly, employment, labor, housing, health care, and educational policies concern not only individuals but seriously affect families. In order to strengthen the family, we must promote biblical moral principles, responsible personal choices, and good public policies on marriage and divorce law, shelter, food, health care, education, and a family wage (Jas. 5:1-6)… We will work for measures that strengthen the economic viability of marriages and families, especially among the poor.

We seek justice and compassion for the poor and vulnerable

Jesus summed up God’s law by commanding us to love God with all that we are and to love our neighbors as ourselves (Matt. 22:35-40). By deed and parable, he taught us that anyone in need is our neighbor (Luke 10:29-37). Because all people are created in the image of God, we owe each other help in time of need.

God identifies with the poor (Ps. 146:5-9), and says that those who “are kind to the poor lend to the Lord” (Prov. 19:17), while those who oppress the poor “show contempt for their Maker” (Prov. 14:31). Jesus said that those who do not care for the needy and the imprisoned will depart eternally from the living God (Matt. 25:31-46). The vulnerable may include not only the poor, but women, children, the aged, persons with disabilities, immigrants, refugees, minorities, the persecuted, and prisoners. God measures societies by how they treat the people at the bottom.

God’s prophets call his people to create just and righteous societies (Isa. 10:1-4, 58:3-12; Jer. 5:26-29, 22:13-19; Amos 2:6-7; Amos 4:1-3, 5:10-15). The prophetic teaching insists on both a fair legal system (which does not favor either the rich or the poor) and a fair economic system (which does not tolerate perpetual poverty). Though the Bible does not call for economic equality, it condemns gross disparities in opportunity and outcome that cause suffering and perpetuate poverty, and it calls us to work toward equality of opportunity.

God wants every person and family to have access to productive resources so that if they act responsibly they can care for their economic needs and be dignified members of their community. Christians reach out to help others in various ways: through personal charity, effective faith-based ministries, and other nongovernmental associations, and by advocating for effective government programs and structural changes.

Economic justice includes both the mitigation of suffering and also the restoration of wholeness. Wholeness includes full participation in the life of the community. Health care, nutrition, and education are important ingredients in helping people transcend the stigma and agony of poverty and re-enter community….

Restoring people to wholeness means that governmental social welfare must aim to provide opportunity and restore people to self-sufficiency. While basic standards of support must be put in place to provide for those who cannot care for their families and themselves, incentives and training in marketable skills must be part of any well-rounded program. We urge Christians who work in the political realm to shape wise laws pertaining to the creation of wealth, wages, education, taxation, immigration, health care, and social welfare that will protect those trapped in poverty and empower the poor to improve their circumstances.

We further believe that care for the vulnerable should extend beyond our national borders. American foreign policy and trade policies often have an impact on the poor. We should try to persuade our leaders to change patterns of trade that harm the poor and to make the reduction of global poverty a central concern of American foreign policy. We must support policies that encourage honesty in government, correct unfair socioeconomic structures, generously support effective programs that empower the poor, and foster economic development and prosperity. Christians should also encourage continued government support of international aid agencies, including those that are faith based.

Especially in the developing world, extreme poverty, lack of health care, the spread of HIV/AIDS, inadequate nutrition, unjust and unstable economies, slavery and sexual trafficking, the use of rape as a tool of terror and oppression, civil war, and government cronyism and graft create the conditions in which large populations become vulnerable. We support Christian agencies and American foreign policy that effectively correct these political problems and promote just, democratic structures.

We work to protect human rights

Because God created human beings in his image, we are endowed with rights and responsibilities…. As recipients of God’s gift of embodied life, people need food, nurture, shelter, and care. In order to fulfill their God-given tasks, all people have a right to private property. God’s design for human existence also implies a right to marry, enjoy family life, and raise and educate children.

While it is not the primary role of government to provide everything that humans need for their well-being, governments are obligated to ensure that people are not unjustly deprived of them and to strengthen families, schools, businesses, hospitals, social-service organizations, and other institutions so they can contribute to human welfare…

America has a tragic history of mistreating Native Americans, the cruel practice of slavery, and the subsequent segregation and exploitation of the descendants of slaves. While the United States has achieved legal and social equality in principle, the legacy of racism still makes many African Americans, Hispanics, and other ethnic minorities particularly vulnerable to a variety of social ills. Our churches have a special responsibility to model good race relations (Rom. 10:12). To correct the lingering effects of our racist history, Christians should support well-conceived efforts that foster dignity and responsibility.

We seek peace and work to restrain violence

…from the beginning, Christians have recognized that God did not call them to bring in God’s kingdom by force. While all Christians have agreed that governments should protect and restore just and peaceful social orders, we have long differed on when governments may use force and whether we may participate in government-authorized force to defend our homelands, rescue others from attack, or liberate other people from oppression.

The peaceful settling of disputes is a gift of common grace. We urge governments to pursue thoroughly nonviolent paths to peace before resorting to military force. We believe that if governments are going to use military force, they must use it in the service of peace and not merely in their national interest. Military force must be guided by the classical just-war principles, which are designed to restrain violence by establishing the right conditions for and right conduct in fighting a war. In an age of nuclear and biological terrorism, such principles are more important than ever.

We urge followers of Jesus to engage in practical peacemaking locally, nationally, and internationally. As followers of Jesus, we should, in our civic capacity, work to reduce conflict by promoting international understanding and engaging in non-violent conflict resolution.

We labor to protect God’s creation

…God gave the care of his earth and its species to our first parents. That responsibility has passed into our hands. We affirm that God-given dominion is a sacred responsibility to steward the earth and not a license to abuse the creation of which we are a part. We are not the owners of creation, but its stewards, summoned by God to “watch over and care for it” (Gen. 2:15). This implies the principle of sustainability: our uses of the Earth must be designed to conserve and renew the Earth rather than to deplete or destroy it….

Just as we show our love for the Savior by reaching out to the lost, we believe that we show our love for the Creator by caring for his creation. Because clean air, pure water, and adequate resources are crucial to public health and civic order, government has an obligation to protect its citizens from the effects of environmental degradation. This involves both the urgent need to relieve human suffering caused by bad environmental practice…

Human beings have responsibility for creation in a variety of ways. We urge Christians to shape their personal lives in creation-friendly ways: practicing effective recycling, conserving resources, and experiencing the joy of contact with nature. We urge government to encourage fuel efficiency, reduce pollution, encourage sustainable use of natural resources, and provide for the proper care of wildlife and their natural habitats.


In 2008, 80 evangelical leaders, including Os Guinness and Dallas Willard, released an Evangelical Manifesto.[3] More than any other previous ones, there is a fairly intense focus on our faith and politics.
 
We believe that being disciples of Jesus means serving him as Lord in every sphere of our lives, secular as well as spiritual, public as well as private, in deeds as well as words, and in every moment of our days on earth, always reaching out as he did to those who are lost as well as to the poor, the sick, the hungry, the oppressed, the socially despised, and being faithful stewards of creation and our fellow-creatures…

What we are about is captured not only in books or declarations, but in our care for the poor, the homeless, and the orphaned; our outreach to those in prison; our compassion for the hungry and the victims of disaster; and our fight for justice for those oppressed by such evils as slavery and human trafficking...

Evangelicalism must be defined theologically and not politically; confessionally and not culturally. Above all else, it is a commitment and devotion to the person and work of Jesus Christ, his teaching and way of life, and an enduring dedication to his lordship above all other earthly powers, allegiances and loyalties. As such, it should not be limited to tribal or national boundaries, or be confused with, or reduced to political categories such as “conservative” and “liberal,” or to psychological categories such as “reactionary” or “progressive…”

All too often we have abandoned our Lord’s concern for those in the shadows, the twilight, and the deep darkness of the world, and become cheerleaders for those in power and the naïve sycophants of the powerful and the rich…

We call for an expansion of our concern beyond single-issue politics, such as abortion and marriage, and a fuller recognition of the comprehensive causes and concerns of the Gospel, and of all the human issues that must be engaged in public life… we must follow the model of Jesus, the Prince of Peace, engaging the global giants of conflict, racism, corruption, poverty, pandemic diseases, illiteracy, ignorance, and spiritual emptiness, by promoting reconciliation, encouraging ethical servant leadership, assisting the poor, caring for the sick, and educating the next generation…

…The other error, made by both the religious left and the religious right in recent decades, is to politicize faith, using faith to express essentially political points that have lost touch with biblical truth. That way faith loses its independence, the church becomes “the regime at prayer,” Christians become “useful idiots” for one political party or another, and the Christian faith becomes an ideology in its purest form. Christian beliefs are used as weapons for political interests...

Christians from both sides of the political spectrum, left as well as right, have made the mistake of politicizing faith…Whichever side it comes from, a politicized faith is faithless, foolish, and disastrous for the church – and disastrous first and foremost for Christian reasons rather than constitutional reasons...

Called to an allegiance higher than party, ideology, and nationality, we Evangelicals see it our duty to engage with politics, but our equal duty never to be completely equated with any party, partisan ideology, economic system, or nationality. In our scales, spiritual, moral, and social power are as important as political power, what is right outweighs what is popular, just as principle outweighs party, truth matters more than team-playing, and conscience more than power and survival...

The politicization of faith is never a sign of strength but of weakness. The saying is wise: “The first thing to say about politics is that politics is not the first thing.” The Evangelical soul is not for sale. It has already been bought at an infinite price...

Let it be known unequivocally that we are committed to religious liberty for people of all faiths, including the right to convert to or from the Christian faith. We are firmly opposed to the imposition of theocracy on our pluralistic society… In contrast to these extremes, our commitment is to a civil public square — a vision of public life in which citizens of all faiths are free to enter and engage the public square on the basis of their faith, but within a framework of what is agreed to be just and free for other faiths too. Thus every right we assert for ourselves is at once a right we defend for others. A right for a Christian is a right for a Jew, and a right for a secularist, and a right for a Mormon, and right for a Muslim, and a right for a Scientologist, and right for all the believers in all the faiths across this wide land…

We utterly deplore the dangerous alliance between church and state, and the oppression that was its dark fruit. We Evangelicals trace our heritage, not to Constantine, but to the very different stance of Jesus of Nazareth. While some of us are pacifists and others are advocates of just war, we all believe that Jesus’ Good News of justice for the whole world was promoted, not by a conqueror’s power and sword, but by a suffering servant emptied of power and ready to die for the ends he came to achieve.

We urge those who share our dedication to the poor, the suffering, and the oppressed to join with us in working to bring care, peace, justice, and freedom to those millions of our fellow-humans who are now ignored, oppressed, enslaved, or treated as human waste and wasted humans by the established orders in the global world.

In 2010, the Cape Town Commitment emerged from the Third Lausanne Congress on World Evangelization. It brought together 4,200 evangelical leaders from 198 countries. Once again, we see some new language that reflects what were increasingly front-and-center cultural issues.

“To resist the multiple forms of disordered sexuality in our surrounding cultures, including pornography, adultery and promiscuity; To seek to understand and address the deep heart issues of identity and experience which draw some people into homosexual practice; to reach out with the love, compassion and justice of Christ, and to reject and condemn all forms of hatred, verbal or physical abuse, and victimization of homosexual people…”

HIV and AIDS constitute a major crisis in many nations. Millions are infected with HIV, including many in our churches, and millions of children are orphaned by AIDS. God is calling us to show his deep love and compassion to all those infected and affected and to make every effort to save lives. We believe that the teachings and example of Jesus, as well as the transforming power of his cross and resurrection, are central to the holistic gospel response to HIV and AIDS that our world so urgently needs.

We reject and denounce all condemnation, hostility, stigma, and discrimination against those living with HIV and AIDS. Such things are a sin and a disgrace within the body of Christ. All of us have sinned and fallen short of God’s glory; we have been saved only by grace, and we should be slow to judge, quick to restore and forgive. We also recognize with grief and compassion that very many people become infected with HIV through no fault of their own, and often through caring for others.

We long that all pastors should set an example of sexual chastity and faithfulness, as Paul commanded, and teach clearly and often that marriage is the exclusive place for sexual union. This is needed not only because it is the clear teaching of the Bible, but also because the prevalence of concurrent sexual partnerships outside marriage is a major factor in the rapid spread of HIV in the most affected countries.

Let us, as the Church worldwide, rise to this challenge in the name of Christ and in the power of the Holy Spirit. Let us stand together with our brothers and sisters in areas hardest hit by HIV and AIDS, through practical support, compassionate care (including care of widows and orphans), social and political advocacy, education programmes (particularly those that empower women), and effective prevention strategies appropriate to the local context. We commit ourselves to such urgent and prophetic action as part of the integral mission of the Church."

Aside from the extensive re-stated commitment to orthodox evangelical pillars of faith, there is so much in this statement on orthopraxy.

Such love for God’s creation demands that we repent of our part in the destruction, waste and pollution of the earth’s resources and our collusion in the toxic idolatry of consumerism. Instead, we commit ourselves to urgent and prophetic ecological responsibility….

We love the world of nations and cultures. ‘From one man, God made all nations of humanity, to live on the whole face of the earth.’ Ethnic diversity is the gift of God in creation…[it]reflects God’s promise to bless all nations on earth and God’s mission to create for himself a people drawn from every tribe, language, nation and people. We must love all that God has chosen to bless, which includes all cultures… Such love for all peoples demands that we reject the evils of racism and ethnocentrism, and treat every ethnic and cultural group with dignity and respect, on the grounds of their value to God in creation and redemption.

We love the world’s poor and suffering. The Bible tells us that the Lord is loving toward all he has made, upholds the cause of the oppressed, loves the foreigner, feeds the hungry, sustains the fatherless and widow… God holds responsible especially those who are appointed to political or judicial leadership in society, but all God’s people are commanded…to reflect the love and justice of God in practical love and justice for the needy.

Such love for the poor demands that we not only love mercy and deeds of compassion, but also that we do justice through exposing and opposing all that oppresses and exploits the poor….We give ourselves afresh to the promotion of justice, including solidarity and advocacy on behalf of the marginalized and oppressed. We recognize such struggle against evil as a dimension of spiritual warfare that can only be waged through the victory of the cross and resurrection, in the power of the Holy Spirit, and with constant prayer.

We love our neighbours as ourselves. Jesus called his disciples to obey this commandment as the second greatest in the law, but then he radically deepened the demand ‘love the foreigner as yourself’ into ‘love your enemies’.

Such love for our neighbours demands that we respond to all people out of the heart of the gospel, in obedience to Christ’s command and following Christ’s example. This love for our neighbours embraces people of other faiths, and extends to those who hate us, slander and persecute us, and even kill us….We emphatically reject the way of violence in the spread of the gospel, and renounce the temptation to retaliate with revenge against those who do us wrong… At the same time, our loving duty towards our suffering neighbours requires us to seek justice on their behalf through proper appeal to legal and state authorities who function as God’s servants in punishing wrongdoers.

We acknowledge with grief and shame the complicity of Christians in some of the most destructive contexts of ethnic violence and oppression, and the lamentable silence of large parts of the Church when such conflicts take place. Such contexts include the history and legacy of racism and black slavery; the holocaust against Jews; apartheid; ‘ethnic cleansing’; inter-Christian sectarian violence; decimation of indigenous populations; inter-religious, political and ethnic violence; Palestinian suffering; caste oppression; and tribal genocide…

We… call for repentance for the many times Christians have been complicit in such evils by silence, apathy or presumed neutrality, or by providing defective theological justification for these.

If the gospel is not deeply rooted in the context, challenging and transforming underlying worldviews and systems of injustice, then, when the evil day comes, Christian allegiance is discarded like an unwanted cloak and people revert to unregenerate loyalties and actions. Evangelizing without discipling, or revival without radical obedience to the commands of Christ, are not just deficient; they are dangerous.

We embrace the witness of the whole Bible, as it shows us God’s desire both for systemic economic justice and for personal compassion, respect and generosity towards the poor and needy….

Have courage to declare that the world cannot address, let alone solve, the problem of poverty without also challenging excessive wealth and greed. The gospel challenges the idolatry of rampant consumerism. We are called, as those who serve God and not mammon, to recognize that greed perpetuates poverty, and to renounce it.

We lament over the widespread abuse and destruction of the earth’s resources, including its bio-diversity. Probably the most serious and urgent challenge faced by the physical world now is the threat of climate change. This will disproportionately affect those in poorer countries, for it is there that climate extremes will be most severe and where there is little capability to adapt to them. World poverty and climate change need to be addressed together and with equal urgency. We encourage Christians worldwide to…

adopt lifestyles that renounce habits of consumption that are destructive or polluting; B) Exert legitimate means to persuade governments to put moral imperatives above political expediency on issues of environmental destruction and potential climate change…

We commit ourselves to be scrupulously ethical in all our evangelism. Our witness is to be marked by ‘gentleness and respect, keeping a clear conscience.’ We therefore reject any form of witness that is coercive, unethical, deceptive, or disrespectful.

In the name of the God of love, we repent of our failure to seek friendships with people of Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist and other religious backgrounds. In the spirit of Jesus, we will take initiatives to show love, goodwill and hospitality to them.

In the name of the God of truth, we (i) refuse to promote lies and caricatures about other faiths, and (ii) denounce and resist the racist prejudice, hatred and fear incited in popular media and political rhetoric.

In the name of the God of peace, we reject the path of violence and revenge in all our dealings with people of other faiths, even when violently attacked.

People are on the move as never before. Migration is one of the great global realities of our era. It is estimated that 200 million people are living outside their countries of origin, voluntarily or involuntarily. The term ‘diaspora’ is used here to mean people who have relocated from their lands of birth for whatever reason. Some relocate permanently, and others, like three million international students and scholars, temporarily. Vast numbers of people from many religious backgrounds, including Christians, live in diaspora conditions: economic migrants seeking work; internally-displaced peoples because of war or natural disaster; refugees and asylum seekers; victims of ethnic cleansing; people fleeing religious violence and persecution; famine sufferers – whether caused by drought, floods, or war; victims of rural poverty moving to cities. We are convinced that contemporary migrations are within the sovereign missional purpose of God, without ignoring the evil and suffering that can be involved.

We encourage Church and mission leaders to recognize and respond to the missional opportunities presented by global migration and diaspora communities, in strategic planning, and in focused training and resourcing of those called to work among them.

We encourage Christians in host nations which have immigrant communities and international students and scholars of other religious backgrounds to bear counter-cultural witness to the love of Christ in deed and word, by obeying the extensive biblical commands to love the stranger, defend the cause of the foreigner, visit the prisoner, practice hospitality, build friendships, invite into our homes, and provide help and services...

The Bible shows that God’s greatest problem is not just with the nations of the world, but with the people he has created and called to be the means of blessing the nations. And the biggest obstacle to fulfilling that mission is idolatry among God’s own people.

When there is no distinction in conduct between Christians and non-Christians – for example in the practice of corruption and greed, or sexual promiscuity, or rate of divorce, or relapse to pre-Christian religious practice, or attitudes towards people of other races, or consumerist lifestyles, or social prejudice – then the world is right to wonder if our Christianity makes any difference at all. Our message carries no authenticity to a watching world…

Since there is no biblical mission without biblical living, we urgently re-commit ourselves, and challenge all those who profess the name of Christ, to live in radical distinctiveness from the ways of the world, to ‘put on the new humanity, created to be like God in true righteousness and holiness.’

For the Health of Our Nation (2004) was updated in 2018 by the National Association of Evangelicals. I will use this opportunity to address a few other items I did not mention earlier. I can only find the 2018 version online, so I am not sure if this constitutes an update or a continuation of the original.

Euthanasia, the destruction of human embryos for research, and unethical human experimentation also transgress the essential nature of human life and violate the God-given dignity of human beings….Christians should also support medical research that uses non-embryonic stem cells and other ethical avenues of research to promote human health. However, we must work toward bans on human cloning and embryonic stem cell research and for laws that prohibit discrimination based on genetic information. Our public policy decisions must respect life and promote the flourishing of each person in every life stage and condition….

We welcome medical advances that promote human life and health…. These impulses are behind some life extension technologies, genetic modifications and biotechnologies that treat the human body as a commodity. We likewise face the temptation to medically intervene in all aspects of life, employing drugs and other technologies not to save lives, but to inappropriately alter cognitive and physical performance or gender identity. Christians must exercise discernment as we witness to the sanctity of human life and warn against the dangers of dissatisfaction with human limits….

Since family systems are also important for nurturing healthy individuals and overcoming poverty, public policy should support families and marriages. Governments should hold parents responsible for the maintenance of their families, enforcing the collection of child-support payments, and should protect family members from physical and sexual abuse. Immigration policies should prioritize family unity and avoid separating families by deportation or detention. Criminal justice reform should consider how over-incarceration breaks up families…

Human rights also extend to those accused of crimes, persons locked up behind prison walls and those who have a criminal record. Our misguided response to crime has neglected victim restitution while locking up more of our citizens — particularly racial minorities — than most other nations. This has pervasive, devastating and long-lasting human and financial consequences for individuals, families and society at large.

We can prevent crime by cultivating the “seedbeds of virtue,” including healthy families, churches, neighborhoods, schools and other sources of moral formation. Our criminal justice system should provide for meaningful participation of crime survivors, fair and proportional punishment of offenders, protection of prisoners’ safety and human dignity, rehabilitation of offenders and help with reintegration into society as contributing citizens. We urge churches to celebrate redemption by helping survivors of crime to heal and forgive, and by welcoming those who have paid their debt.

The Seoul Statement (2024) was released by the Lausanne Movement at the Fourth Lausanne Congress in South Korea. It drew over 5,000 attendees from more than 200 countries.  As with the previous statements from Lausanne, it begins with a thorough restatement of the core statements of faith in evangelicalism. I will be highlighting the orthopraxy revealed in the document.

We reject the notion that individuals may determine their gender without regard to our createdness.… Throughout history, however, persons whose sex is not observably clear at birth (broadly designated today as intersex individuals) have faced significant psychological and social challenges… the people of God are called to respond with compassion and respect towards those who face similar circumstances today.

"[The church] has all too often succumbed to the allure of political power, of cultural approval and of the world’s pleasures, abandoning its mandate to be God’s prophetic witness in the world. In such instances the church becomes an instrument of oppression, complicit in acts of injustice, and loses its credibility in the world...

"Just as the world hears Christ in gospel proclamation, it can also see Christ through our love for one another and our neighbours, through how we care for his creation and do excellent work in our daily callings....These works promote the common good, prioritise care for the poor and most vulnerable, and advance the cause of justice following the example of our Lord. (Matt 5:16; John 13:35; Eph 2:8-10; Luke 4:18-19).

"We grieve the tragic loss of life [wars] exact and the massive destruction to societies, which deny future generations their opportunity to flourish. We repent of our failures to condemn and restrain violence by remaining silent, by promoting nationalism, or by unjustly supporting conflicts through deficient theological justification.

We condemn those who use their influence in world affairs to promote avoidable conflicts and wars, merely to further their economic and political interests. We are saddened by the immense suffering their actions have caused. We believe that they will be held accountable before God on the day of judgement.

We call all Christians to serve the vulnerable in contexts of war by pooling our resources and supporting the relief efforts of churches and humanitarian organizations that are situated near conflict zones...

Christians at various times in history have not only promoted violence and war but also remained silent in the face of such atrocities rather than speaking with prophetic integrity and courage…. We echo the Cape Town Commitment in calling “for repentance for the many times Christians have been complicit in such evils by silence, apathy or presumed neutrality, or by providing defective theological justification for these.”

It is critically important that Christians think clearly about biblical peoples when they (e.g. Israelites, Egyptians, Syrians) are associated by name, history, geography, or ancestry with modern nation-states (e.g. Israel, Egypt, Syria) and the peoples who live under the political sovereignty of these states (Jews, Palestinians, Arabs, Copts, Druze, Armenians, Kurds, and many more)... In the Middle East, and elsewhere, Christian leaders must work to correct theological errors that provide ideological justification for unjust violence against innocent civilians or seek to legitimise violations of international humanitarian law.

We lament that some Christians have looked to the state rather than the gospel as the key means for bringing about God’s intentions for the world. This takes an especially regrettable form when wed to nationalism—here defined as the belief that every state should have a single, national culture and no other—or ethnonationalism—which is the belief that every ethnic group should have its own state. This is a great evil in our world.

We lament that many Christians have been sadly complicit in it, as well as in the claims of ethnic and racial supremacy it fosters. Against this, we assert that no modern state is able to claim or will ever be able to claim to be the special agent of God’s saving rule.

* * * * *

 I don't want us to miss something important about these declarations.

  • The same evangelical leaders who talked about racism and social justice also affirmed the sanctity of human life, including unborn children.

  • They spoke of the dignity of immigrants and refugees while also affirming historic Christian understandings of sexuality and marriage.

  • They wanted biblical moral values to inform the structures of families and they wanted Christians to be leading non-violent resolutions to conflict and refusing to trust in military might.

  • They thought law enforcement to protect innocent people was very important, and that those were were guilty were treated humanely and with hope for rehabilitation.

  • They insisted biology should inform identity and that those with confusing biology or gender dysphoria should be treated with compassion and dignity.

  • They were concerned about the environment and drug and human trafficking and a fair wage and materialism and pointing to Jesus as the only way to God.

A representation of 7 key areas in evangelical declarations during my lifetime.

These aren’t competing visions of the Kingdom. They are parts of the same moral vision, even though in today’s world some sound more red, and some more blue.

We live in a culture that wants us to choose sides. Conservative or liberal. Once we've chosen a side, there's a temptation to think that the moral concerns our side emphasizes are the ones that really matter while minimizing the ones “they” think are important. What if they are all important?

Jesus and his vision for the Kingdom doesn't fit neatly into our political categories. We aren't beholden to a side of the Empire. We follow Jesus wherever he leads.  Every day, our lives are making a declaration about what we believe God is like. If we believe that God is just like Jesus, then perhaps the most important question we can ask ourselves is this:

When people encounter us, are they getting an accurate picture of Jesus?

Like I said earlier, we're going to return to the book of Acts, in which a community of believers trying to figure out what it meant to act as followers of Jesus in a world that didn't often share their convictions. They didn't always get it right. They had prejudices, disagreements, and blind spots. They sometimes struggled to live up to the implications of the gospel they proclaimed. #thatsoundprettynormal

But the Spirit kept working among them, teaching them what it meant to become a community that looked like Jesus. As that happened, they changed the world.

That's my prayer for us. May our minds become increasingly aligned with the mind of Jesus. May our hearts increasingly reflect his radically forgiving, self-giving, co-suffering love. May our actionsincreasingly demonstrate the character of Jesus to the world around us.

___________________________________________________________________________________

[1]  I encourage you to find these online and read them in their entirety. You will find that our statement of faith aligns with a consistent orthodoxy ‘through line’ over the 50 year time span.

[2] It was designed to elaborate, clarify, and update the 1974 Lausanne Covenant. 

[3] The manifesto was initially endorsed by roughly 75 to 80 leaders including Leith Anderson, Jim Wallis, Max Lucado, Mark Noll, Miroslav Volf, Darrell Bock, J.P. Moreland, Alvin Plantinga, Ron Sider, Samuel Rodriguez, Kay Arthur, and Jack Hayford. Interestingly,  James Dobson, Tony Perkins, and Albert Mohler Jr. declined to participate, contending that the manifesto's focus on political civility diluted vital stands on cultural issues.

 

The ‘Ortho’ Do List: -doxy, -praxy, and -pathy.

I’ve had lots of time to think, pray, and study while on sabbatical. I’ve stayed in tune with messages here at CLG, and I am aware there is ongoing discussion about how we do life together well as followers of Jesus in politically divided times. So, let’s go there. If you are feeling nervous, know that I am going to end up talking about Jesus over and over.

I have gotten two very different requests over the years: “Can we please not talk about politics?" and. “Why don’t we talk about politics more?” The reality is that every message I bring has political implications. Our word ‘politics’ comes from the Greek polis, which the Topical Lexicon defines as:

“…an identifiable community with social, political, and spiritual implications.”

It turns out most of life is not made up of merely political issues. It’s composed of moral issues. We are asking questions about how human beings should live together in light of Jesus, and that involves issues of justice, power, life, truth, peace, strangers, enemies, children, prisons, violence, wealth and poverty, freedom, law and grace (spiritually and practically), sex, race and ethnicity, and living as a citizen of the Kingdom in the midst of earthly empires.

Jesus didn’t commission his disciples to establish a Christian empire, of course. He called them to follow him, to love their neighbors, to love their enemies, to make disciples, and to embody a different way of living in the world. So though I am going to talk about applying kingdom principles in our lives as citizens, it’s not because the United States of America was, is or will be the Kingdom of God.[1] It’s an empire filled with people whose kingdom is not of this world.

There is a reason Jesus used salt and light as analogies for our presence in the world. There is a lot that needs to be cured (#salt), and a lot that is really dark (#light). I don’t expect the governments of empire to operate according to all the values of the Kingdom of God. Sometimes laws or policies overlap with Kingdom values, but I’m not surprised if they don’t. That’s why the world we live in is a mission field 

While we don't expect the Empire to act like Jesus, we are still called to live as Kingdom ambassadors while living in the Empire.[2] Hopefully that salt and light can have an influence, but it will be no less salty or light if it doesn’t. What’s important is that we are faithful Christians in the nation where we live.[3]

When Jesus invited people to follow him, he began to do the kind of work Jesus does. He told them truth; he revealed the heart of God for others; he demonstrated the path of righteousness. In church circles, we call that orthodoxy (right belief), orthopathy (righteous emotions) and orthopraxy (right actions).

  • Orthodoxy asks, What is true? The teaching of Jesus shapes our minds.

  • Orthopathy asks, What does the heart of God love, grieve, and delight in? The heart of Jesus shapes our emotions.

  • Orthopraxy asks, How then shall we live? The life of Jesus directs our actions.

Orthodoxy: Think true things. There are several places in the Bible that we can think of as early creeds, or statements of faith. For example:

“Now I would remind you, brothers, of the gospel I preached to you, which you received,  in which you stand, and by which you are being saved, if you hold fast to the word I preached to you—unless you believed in vain.For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures… (1 Corinthians 15:1-4)

As church history unfolds, we see longer and longer creeds emerge as people are trying to keep guiderails on true belief, but we get the basics in Scripture. Now, thinking true things is bigger than theology (which focuses on God). It’s the principle: there are things that are true about the world, and we want to participate in that. #worldview

Orthopathy: Feel righteous emotions. Jesus didn't merely teach ideas. He revealed His heart.

·      Matthew 9: He had compassion.

·      Luke 19: He wept.

·      Mark 3: He was angry and grieved.

Jesus modeled what it looked like to have the right heart in a given situation. We are instructed to match proper emotions – a heart stance? - to life. Paul wrote to the church in Philippi:

“ It is right for me to feel this way about all of you, since I have you in my heart… God can testify how I long for all of you with the affection of Christ Jesus.” (Philippians 1:7-8)

Interesting choice of words. HELPS Word Studies gives us a helpful explanation of what is meant by the “affection” of Jesus.

“Properly, the internal organs ("viscera"); (figuratively) "gut-level compassion" (visceral feelings); the capacity to feel deep emotions (sympathy, empathy, etc.).

So, following Jesus isn’t going to be just mental agreement with God’s truth. It’s going to put deep emotions into our gut that are meant to represent the affections of Jesus. When we hear about an issue, what do we feel in our gut? And is it something Jesus would feel?

Orthopraxy: What are we to do?

James tells us that faith without works is dead. Micah 6 tells us that followers of God are going to do justice while loving mercy and walking humbly with God. In fact, the OT prophets had a lot to say about this. For example:

“ This is what the Lord says: Do what is just and right. Rescue from the hand of the oppressor the one who has been robbed. Do no wrong or violence to the foreigner, the fatherless or the widow, and do not shed innocent blood in this place…. [Josiah] did what was right and just,  so all went well with him. He defended the cause of the poor and needy, and so all went well. Is that not what it means to know me?” declares the Lord. (Jeremiah 22)[4]

Whenever Christians discuss difficult issues involving life in the polis, there are three different questions that must be answered.

  • What is bible-based, Kingdom truth about this issue? (orthodoxy)

  • What kind of gut-level response best reflects the heart of Jesus? (orthopathy)

  • How can I order my life in a way that looks like Jesus and supports the way of the Kingdom? (orthopraxy)

Let’s try this as we apply an old saying in Christian circles: "In essentials, unity; in non-essentials, liberty; in all things, charity (love).”[5] And since this is election season, each example will look not only at our personal responsibility, but also at unity, liberty and charity in light of making decisions supporting public policy that will form us into a particular kind of community, city, and nation.[6]

Immigration

Orthodoxy: What foundation does Scripture give about responding to the foreigners and strangers? (Lots of instruction/examples in the OT.)

Orthopathy: What should God's people feel toward citizens and non-citizens alike if we want to have the heart of Jesus?

Orthopraxy: What actions reflect justice, mercy, and humility before God (Micah 6:8)? 

Whatever our government decides about immigration, Jesus has already told us how to love our neighbor. How do we treat the immigrants in our neighborhood, workplace, or church? Are we extending hospitality, friendship, and dignity? THEN, when it comes to public policy, Christians may disagree over the details about how the border is handled, visas, quotas, and asylum procedures. But it ought to be an extension of what we have personally committed to already as we have aligned ourselves with Jesus.

· Unity: embracing a biblical vision of mercy and justice for everyone involved

· Liberty: specific border policies, responsible quotas, asylum procedures, etc. that best help all human flourishing.[7]

· Charity: Christ-like love for everyone impacted by the issue that is expressed in what we do and support.

Poverty

Orthodoxy: Jesus announces that the gospel is good news to the poor (Luke 4:18–19). God showed Israel how to order their whole society so that"there will be no poor among you." (Deuteronomy 15:4; 11).[8] #goals

Orthopathy: What is the Christ-like emotional response when we encounter the impoverished?[9]

Orthopraxy: Ezekiel 16:49 identifies neglect of the poor as part of Sodom's sin: "She and her daughters had pride, excess of food, and prosperous ease, but did not aid the poor and needy." 1 John 3:16–18 reminds us that love requires more than words: "How does God's love abide in anyone who has the world's goods and sees a brother or sister in need and yet refuses help?"[10]

Before we vote for policies impacting welfare, taxation, or economic policy… Are we personally generous? Do we sacrifice to help someone we know is struggling? Christians may land in different places concerning how to best use taxes and assistance programs to steward resources without creating unhelpful dependency. But whatever we do and support for those in poverty should be an extension of our personal commitments, which should look like something Jesus would do.

· Unity: let Scripture guide our mercy and justice for the impoverished.

· Liberty: amount of personal help; details of public policy that best help to address poverty.

· Charity: Christ-like love for everyone impacted by the issue that is expressed in what we do and support.

Racism

Orthodoxy:  In Christ, ethnicity does not determine standing before God (Galatians 3:28). Peter declares that God shows no favoritism (Acts 10:34–35). At Pentecost, the gathering of diverse nations anticipates the reversal of Babel's division; in Revelation, every “tribe, nation and tongue” gather (Revelation 5:9; 7:9).

Orthopathy: What affection does Jesus have toward someone treated with suspicion, contempt, or hostility because of race or ethnicity?

Orthopraxy: Refuse racial contempt, treat people fairly, confront injustice, and practice our ministry of reconciliation.[11]

Before discussing public policies that address affirmative action, DEI, or government programs or restitution, we should be doing introspection. Am I willing to take seriously the lived experiences of others? Am I treating people fairly and confronting discrimination?  Then, when I vote, does my vote support what I have already committed to personally as a follower of Jesus?

· Unity: providing mercy and justice for anyone experiencing discrimination or abuse because of their race or ethnicity.

· Liberty: supporting what we believe will be the most effective public policies to address this.

· Charity: Christ-like love for everyone impacted by racism that is expressed in what we do and support so that we all can flourish.

Transgender Athletes

Orthodoxy: All boys and girls – including those with gender dysphoria - bear God's image and possess inherent dignity. Jesus cares about them all.

Orthopathy: What is the heart of Jesus toward a transgender teenager who feels isolated or rejected? Toward a girl who believes she has lost a fair (and perhaps safe) opportunity to compete?

Orthopraxy: How do we righteously care for transgender neighbors and family members while a) protecting young people from bullying and violence, and b) taking concerns about fairness, privacy, and safety seriously?

Personally, do we speak about transgender people with dignity and not contempt? Are we willing to listen to those who feel excluded or disdained – and those who are concerned about safety and fairness? Before we decide what policies are best for young athletes, are we thinking, feeling and speaking about everyone in the discussion in a way that honors the imago dei in everyone?

· Unity: honoring the imago dei, embodying mercy, justice, truth and love

· Liberty: specific sports policies

· Charity: Christ-like love for everyone involved that is expressed in what we do and support to bring about everyone’s flourishing by the standards of the Kingdom.

Health Care

Orthodoxy: Jesus repeatedly moved toward the sick and suffering (Matthew 9:35–36). The Good Samaritan provided practical and financial care to someone unable to help himself (Luke 10:33–35).[12]

Orthopathy: What does Jesus feel toward a parent unable to afford treatment for a sick child, regardless of the reason, or an elderly person choosing between medication and groceries?

Orthopraxy: Following Jesus and the early church's example, we should care for the sick, alleviate suffering, and seek to make sure that people needing care can receive it.

Caring for the sick has always been a moral concern to God’s people, not merely an economic or political calculation. If we are the kind of neighbor who moves toward people who are suffering; what does it look like to vote in a way that invites an entire society to join us?

· Unity: acting with generosity, mercy and justice for those in need

· Liberty: the most effective way to care for people (types of insurance coverage, government spending, etc.)

· Charity: Christ-like love for everyone involved that is expressed in what we do and support.

Crime, Punishment, and Incarceration

Orthodoxy: God cares about justice for victims (Psalm 82:3–4). Jesus calls us to visit prisoners (Matthew 25:36). Scripture teaches that repentance and transformation are possible. Consequences, restitution and restoration can coexist.

Orthopathy: What is Jesus' heart toward someone assaulted, robbed, or sexually abused? What heart does he have for the offender? Can we grieve the victim's suffering while hoping for the offender's repentance and rehabilitation?[13]

Orthopraxy: Protect communities, pursue accountability, care for victims, prevent further harm, avoid cruelty and dehumanization for the incarcerated, and create opportunities for rehabilitation and reconciliation.

As Christians disagree about the most just sentencing, the use of the death penalty, etc., do we care for victims? Do we believe offenders can be changed by Jesus? What are the implications of that?

· Unity: acting with mercy and justice for all those impacted by crime.

· Liberty: deciding how we best do this in our society in light of Jesus

· Charity: Christ-like love for everyone involved that is expressed in what we do and support.

Unity in Jesus does not require uniformity in areas of liberty. Also, having that liberty of disagreement does not excuse us from evaluating our conclusions by the character and teachings of Jesus. Whatever we do and support must result from our most honest attempts to think and feel like Jesus, so that we look like Jesus when we act.

* * * * *

This is what I mean when I say that every sermon is about politics as I described it at the beginning. The Gospel has practical implications in our lives and in our communities, including how we vote on “political issues” that are often deeply moral issues about which Jesus has something to say to those who claim his name.

The goal of the church is not to make Republicans more Republican, Democrats more Democrat, or Libertarians more Libertarian. No politician or political party is Lord of the Christian. Jesus is. May we faithfully follow him wherever he leads us, with unity on the essentials, liberty on the non-essentials, and love all the time.


_________________________________________________________________________

[1] John 18:36 — "My kingdom is not of this world." Jesus tells Pilate that his Kingdom does not originate from this world. He contrasts his Kingdom with the kind of power maintained through violence. This doesn't mean his Kingdom has no implications for this world. It means its source, character, and methods are fundamentally different.

[2] Jeremiah 29:7 — Seek the welfare of the city

God instructs his people, living in exile in Babylon, to seek the welfare of the city in which they live.They are not commanded to turn Babylon into Israel. Neither are they told to pull back from concern for Babylon.They are called to live faithfully as God's people while   contributing to the welfare of a society that does not share their covenant identity.

[3]The biblical prophets regularly held nations, including pagan nations, accountable for  violence, oppression, and injustice (Amos 1–2 is a particularly good example, or think of Jonah going to Ninevah). In that sense, the empire is not morally exempt from doing justice. See Romans 1 for a kind of global conscience that God has gifted the world.

[4] In Isaiah 58 we read that God, after rejecting the fasts of His people, said, “Is not this the kind of fasting I have chosen: to loose the chains of injustice and untie the cords of the yoke, to set the oppressed free and break every yoke? Is it not to share your food with the hungry and to provide the poor wanderer with shelter—when you see the naked, to clothe them, and not to turn away from your own flesh and blood? Then your light will break forth like the dawn, and your healing will quickly appear; then your righteousness will go before you, and the glory of the Lord will be your rear guard.” Jesus told multiple parables in which he echoed the prophets. His teaching in Matthew 25 reminds us to feed, visit, clothe, and take care of the “least” around us. Luke 10’s Parable of the Good Samaritan clarified who counts as a neighbor (everybody) and what kind of care we should show them.

[5] Attributed to the 17th-century German theologian Peter Meiderlin. Non-essential does not mean unimportant; it means not everything is held in a “closed hand.”

[6] A friend noted that many decisions involve not only biblical interpretation but also empirical evidence, practical reasoning, and judgments about the responsibilities of government, not to mention self-awareness regarding bias, which should be ongoing as we submit to God and ask him to show us where we are off. A values analysis matters as well, because many arguments stem from competing ‘good” but different values.

[7] Let’s define this as “living well in light of the values of the Kingdom of God.”

[8] Which, interestingly, Jesus’ disciples were apparently not honoring. See Matthew 26:11, where Jesus quotes Deuteronomy 15:11

[9] Key Bible verses where Jesus teaches about or cares for the poor include passages like Matthew 25:35–40, where Jesus notes that caring for the needy is equivalent to caring for Him, and Luke 4:18, which describes His mission to preach good news to the poor. Other notable instructions include selling possessions to give to the poor (Matthew 19:21, Mark 10:21, and Luke 12:33), inviting the marginalized to banquets (Luke 14:13–14), and recognizing the profound sacrifice in the Widow's Offering (Luke 21:1–4).

[10] Notice that the first addresses corporate responsibility; the second, individual responsibility.

[11] 2 Corinthians 5:18

[12] Jesus may well have chosen the Samaritan as protagonist precisely because of the shock value of an enemy doing the right thing.

[13] As a wise friend told me, “I think it is far easier to have compassion on those held in contempt, than it is to have compassion on those who are contemptuous, or predatory, or brutish, or abusive.” True. And yet we follow the path of Jesus: “Father, forgive them…”

He, Too, Saved Israel (Judges 3)

I feel like I have been given a lot of practice in humility in the last number of years.

  • My heart attack knocked the wind out of me for a while, and the sad identity I built on my ability to produce and do and impress was forced to take a seat.

  • My major shoulder surgery and two knee replacements mean that, while doing rehab at the gym, I’m the 215 pound guy using machines with 10 lbs.

  • This sabbatical is a reminder that, no matter what I want to do or think I should be able to do, I need rest.

And in all of these examples, they were very public. It forces a bit of a reckoning when it comes to identity and value. So we are going to talk today about being content with humility and rejecting pride, because if I have to wrestle with it, you get to also :) 

We are going to go Old Testament, with a story that is going to seem like an odd start to this message.

“Again the Israelites cried out to the LORD [they were subject to Eglon king of Moab for eighteen years), and he gave them a deliverer—Ehud… The Israelites sent him with tribute to Eglon king of Moab.  Now Ehud had made a double-edged sword about a foot and a half long, which he strapped to his right thigh under his clothing.

He presented the tribute to Eglon king of Moab, who was a very fat man. After Ehud had presented the tribute, he sent on their way the men who had carried it.  At the idols near Gilgal he himself turned back and said, "I have a secret message for you, O king."  The king said, "Quiet!" And all his attendants left him.

Ehud then approached him while he was sitting alone in the upper room of his summer palace and said, "I have a message from God for you." As the king rose from his seat,  Ehud reached with his left hand, drew the sword from his right thigh and plunged it into the king's belly...  Then Ehud went out to the porch; he shut the doors of the upper room behind him and locked them. 

After he had gone, the servants came and found the doors of the upper room locked. They said, "He must be relieving himself in the inner room of the house."  They waited to the point of embarrassment, but when he did not open the doors of the room, they took a key and unlocked them. There they saw their lord fallen to the floor, dead. 

While they waited, Ehud got away. He passed by the idols and escaped to Seirah. When he arrived there, he blew a trumpet in the hill country of Ephraim, and the Israelites went down with him from the hills, with him leading them. 

"Follow me," he ordered, "for the LORD has given Moab, your enemy, into your hands…" After Ehud came Shamgar son of Anath, who struck down six hundred Philistines with an ox goad. He too saved Israel. (Judges 3: 15-31)

 After this chapter in which Ehud gets most of the chapter and Shamgar gets one verse, we hear about more judges.

  • Judges 4-5 – Deborah gets two chapters and a song

  • Judges 6-8  - Gideon gets three chapters

  • Judges 9 - Abimelech gets a chapter (he killed his own brothers)

  • Judges 11 and 12 – Jepthah gets two chapters (he sacrificed his daughter)

  • Judges 13-16 – Samson gets 4 chapters, and he was hardly a role model.

 Then we get some other “fly over” references similar to the reference to Shamgar:

Judges 10: 1-5 “…a man of Issachar, Tola son of Puah, the son of Dodo, rose to save Israel. He lived in Shamir, in the hill country of Ephraim. He led Israel twenty-three years; then he died, and was buried in Shamir. He was followed by Jair of Gilead, who led Israel twenty-two years. He had thirty sons, who rode thirty donkeys. They controlled thirty towns in Gilead, which to this day are called Havvoth Jair.  When Jair died, he was buried in Kamon.”

Now, the beginning of Judges notes that, “whenever the LORD raised up a judge for them, he was with the judge and saved them out of the hands of their enemies as long as the judge lived; for the LORD had compassion on them as they groaned under those who oppressed and afflicted them.”

If you were a judge, God himself had raised you up to save His people, and He was with you as long as you lived.  And some of them have their stories recorded for all the world to read, and some of them get a sentence. 

Let’s say you’re Shamgar; you saved your nation by killing 600 enemy warriors with a big stick with a pointy end, and you basically get an “atta boy.” That’s like saying like giving a history of the NBA, and then saying, “And Michael Jordan also played basketball.”  Or discussing a history of music, and saying of Beethoven, “He too wrote music.”  Or saying of Ohio State, “They too had a football team.” Tola and Jair were raised up by God himself, and all they get is that they lived, they died, and their sons rode donkeys from town to town, which seems like bit of really unnecessary trivia.

Today, when people are treated like this, they go on TV and say things like, “I’m being disrespected.”  We are a culture that increasingly seems to think that we all deserve our 15 minutes of fame, and if it doesn’t happen naturally, well, there are always reality shows, and YouTube, and blogs. Ashleigh Brilliant once wrote, “All I ask of life is a constant and exaggerated sense of my own importance.”  To whatever degree that’s funny, it’s probably because it is an accurate reflection of the natural human condition.

I think the Biblical narratives of stories like these point us toward a hard reality in the Christian walk: Sometimes, God will raise us up, and use us mightily, and we will never get the credit we think we deserve.   

Unsung Heroes, by Riva Pomerantz 

I was delighted when my husband bought a beautiful name plaque for our front door... until I noticed the door. Years of fingerprints, remnants of gummy tape, stickers, and I don’t even want to think about what else, had etched themselves onto the once-white door. A quick glance from beautiful nameplate to horrifying door brought me to the only possible conclusion: clean the door.

So two hours later, the door was sparkling white and the nameplate was handsomely ensconced in its center. When my kids got up in the morning and saw the complete metamorphosis of the front door, they were—of course—awed. “Look Daddy!” they told my husband. “They cleaned the door.” My husband told me of their reaction with some amusement.

“They cleaned the door?” I practically yelled. “They is me! I cleaned the door! What do they think? Magic fairies come while we all sleep and clean the furniture, put away the toys, bake cookies...” So in the grand scheme of door-cleaning, I remain an unsung hero. 

Unsung heroes. One of the biggest hurdles to overcome is this role of unsung hero, because we have in us a drive to be noticed, to stand out, to be somebody in the eyes of other people.

For one, it’s hard for us to watch other people around us be successful when we aren’t.

Have you ever been playing a sport, and you are really struggling, but the rest of your team isn’t, and your team is still winning, but you have a hard time being excited because you personally aren’t doing so well?

Have you ever gotten upset when people get a lot of attention for the same thing you are doing, while you don’t get any attention…. Like the person who shares a testimony about God saving them from a particular sin or overcoming a tough circumstance in life, and everyone cheers and affirms them, and then invites them to speak in front of other groups, and they become a widely-known role model everyone admires, and you think, “Hey, that’s my story too, but no one knows…”  What about me?[1]

But the Bible is clear: There is no room for ego in the Kingdom of God. It is never about us; it is always about God. Jesus said, 

"Be careful not to do your 'acts of righteousness' before men, to be seen by them. If you do, you will have no reward from your Father in heaven. So when you give to the needy, do not announce it with trumpets, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and on the streets, to be honored by men. I tell you the truth; they have received their reward in full.  

But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. (Matthew 6:1-4)

 The point is not that you should never do good deeds in public, and the point isn’t that people who do charity out of selfish ambition are going to hell. The point is that if you do good things for the reward of the praise of people, you will get your reward.  It just won’t be that great.

 The applause of people is nothing compared to the rewards of the Father. We don’t have to boast or draw attention to ourselves. Our reward is in following and communing with God, and that’s enough. An example from the Apostle Paul:

2 Timothy 4:17  “The Lord stood at my side and gave me strength, so that through me the message might be fully proclaimed and all the Gentiles might hear it. And I was delivered from the lion's mouth.”

If Paul were alive today, we would all clamor to read the book or see the movie about his deliverance from lions, we would ask him to be on GodTube for an interview about the lions…but I suspect Paul would quickly lose his “celebrity” status, as he would ignore the lions and talk about the Lord who gave him the strength to fully proclaim the Good News to the world.  If he ever mentioned it, there would be one small comment or one small footnote that would start off, “Around the time I was delivered from lions...”

My hunch is that Paul knew that a story about Paul being delivered from the lions was going to become a story about Paul, not about the One who delivered Paul.  And in the kingdom of heaven, if that is the case, why tell the story? 

Now, this does not mean that we never share stories of how God moves in the world. The Bible is full of stories of spiritual and physical miracles.  But I think Paul understood what it meant that “He [Jesus] must increase, and I must decrease.” The stories must always point to Jesus. The Bible says that God will share His glory with no one (Isaiah 42 and 48).

When Paul does “boast” about himself in the Bible (2 Corinthians 11), it is because his audience had become caught up in Christian Celebrity Worship, and Paul basically said, “Okay, if you want to play that game, I win. Here are my credentials.  Now settle down and get back to the things that matter most.” As part of this, he recounts an experience he had:

Fourteen years ago, there was this man I knew—a believer in the Anointed who was caught up to the third heaven. (Whether this was an in- or out-of-body experience I don’t know; only God knows.) This man was caught up into paradise (let me say it again, whether this was an in- or out-of-body experience I don’t know; only God knows), and he heard inexpressible words—words a mortal man is forbidden to utter. 

I could brag about such a man; but as for me, I have nothing to brag about outside my own shortcomings. So if I want to boast, I won’t do so as a fool because I will be speaking the truth. But I will stop there, since I don’t want to be credited with anything except exactly what people see and hear from me. 

To keep me grounded and stop me from becoming too high and mighty due to the extraordinary character of these revelations, I was given a thorn in the flesh—a nagging nuisance of Satan, a messenger to plague me!  I begged the Lord three times to liberate me from its anguish; and finally He said to me, “My grace is enough to cover and sustain you. My power is made perfect in weakness.” 

So ask me about my thorn, inquire about my weaknesses, and I will gladly go on and on—I would rather stake my claim in these and have the power of the Anointed One at home within me. (2 Corinthians 12)

Another example from Paul comes from Philippians 4:

“All the saints send you greetings, especially those who belong to Caesar's household.”

 Who converted a lot of Caesar’s household after Caesar threw him into jail in the Preattorian barracks attached to the palace? That would be Paul. How easily Paul could have written, “All the saints send you greetings, especially those I converted from Caesar’s household in spite of intense persecution to my personal self.”  But the story is not about Paul. There was no need for him to worry about whether or not people knew about what he did.  God knew, and that was enough.[2]

So the question today is this, “Can I live my life with no regard for the glory and recognition of others, but with complete focus on faithfulness and obedience to Christ?”

Are we willing to take the time to let God help us build our character –to address sin in our lives, and character flaws, and quirks that are maybe hindering our relationship with God and others –  when maybe no one will ever really notice?

Are we willing to work really hard to be a godly spouses and parents – setting priorities on our time, putting the needs of our spouse and kids above our wants, doing whatever we can to steward our household – are we willing to do that because Jesus has raised us up for our family, and to do that even if nobody holds us up as a role model?

Can we go out of our way to volunteer – here at Sunday School or nursery or music ministry or committee work; in the community at Goodwill or Meals on Wheels or Habitat or the homeless shelter - - can we do that even if nobody sees us?

Can we love the people who seem unlovable, embrace the people who seem unembraceable, forgive those around us who have done things that seem unforgivable…that’s hard enough, but can we do it knowing we might never get a pat on the back on this side of heaven?

Can we live lives of sacrifice, without thought of the rewards that this life has to give?

Can we be broken, and spilled out, in the service of Christ, for our spouses, and our kids, and our friends, our neighbors, our co-workers, those people who make us take up a cross…Can we do that even if the only time we hear, “Well done, good and faithful servant” is on the other side of the grave?

What does a life look like…what does the world look like…when we embrace this view of the kingdom of God? 

Maybe your life will be written in lights. And if so, and it was God who wanted your story known, then tell your story to the glory of God.  It’s not like Deborah and Gideon were bad people because their story was told. And I’m not suggesting we don’t try to give people honest recognition for their kindness and service.

It’s just that that won’t happen to everybody, and maybe the record of your life will be of the “He too saved Israel” variety.

Maybe “She, too, overcame addictions,” will be the most people say about you, which will never capture how hard the struggle was.

Maybe “He, too, had a family,” is the most that will register with people, which will never capture the self-sacrificial love that was necessary to make your family a success.

Maybe “He, too, overcame a difficult past,” is the most people will know about you, which will never do justice to the pain you experienced, and the long, slow process of healing that God has taken you through.

Maybe “They, too, were in ministry,” is all that people will note about you someday, which will never reflect the years of your life spent in quietly helping those who so desperately needed Jesus.

But in the Kingdom of Heaven, all of us who “oh-by-the-way-saved- Israel” have a Heavenly Father who is waiting for the day when we will enter into His presence.  And on that day, millions of unsung heroes will hear, “Well done, good and faithful servant” as they enter into their reward.


_______________________________________________________________________________

[1] Max Lucado wrote a book It’s Not About Me, and in it he says, “I believe Satan trains battalions of demons to whisper one question in our ears: “What are people thinking of you?”

[2] A.W. Tozer said: “The meek man… knows well that the world will never see him as God sees him and he has stopped caring.”

 

Acts 11: Proclamation and Provision

Acts 11–14 reads like a string of mission updates. It’s a montage of snapshots of ministry before Acts 15, at which there is a really important meeting within the new church about how to incorporate Gentile believers into a church still heavily influenced by their Jewish background. 

If we zoom out, this section is telling a unified story. It’s a turning point where the Jesus movement stops being a localized Jewish renewal movement and becomes a multi-ethnic, Spirit-driven alternative to Empire. Acts 11 to 14 answers a really important question:

“What should the Kingdom of Jesus look like as it spreads into the world of Empire?”

Acts 10 showed Cornelius and Peter figuring out that God was for the Gentiles too. Peter has a vision of God telling him not to call things unclean when God has made them clean. This is where we pick up today. I need to read the whole chapter for context.

The apostles and the believers throughout Judea heard that the Gentiles also had received the word of God.  So when Peter went up to Jerusalem, the circumcised believers criticized him and said, “You went into the house of uncircumcised men and ate with them.”

Starting from the beginning, Peter told them the whole story: “I was in the city of Joppa praying, and in a trance I saw a vision. I saw something like a large sheet being let down from heaven by its four corners, and it came down to where I was.

 I looked into it and saw four-footed animals of the earth, wild beasts, reptiles and birds. Then I heard a voice telling me, ‘Get up, Peter. Kill and eat.’

 “I replied, ‘Surely not, Lord! Nothing impure or unclean has ever entered my mouth.’ “The voice spoke from heaven a second time, ‘Do not call anything impure that God has made clean.’ This happened three times, and then it was all pulled up to heaven again.

 “Right then three men who had been sent to me from Caesarea stopped at the house where I was staying. The Spirit told me to have no hesitation about going with them. These six brothers also went with me, and we entered the man’s house. 

He told us how he had seen an angel appear in his house and say, ‘Send to Joppa for Simon who is called Peter. He will bring you a message through which you and all your household will be saved.’

 “As I began to speak, the Holy Spirit came on them as he had come on us at the beginning. Then I remembered what the Lord had said: ‘John baptized with water, but you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit.’ 

 So if God gave them the same gift he gave us who believed in the Lord Jesus Christ, who was I to think that I could stand in God’s way?” When they heard this, they had no further objections and praised God, saying, “So then, even to Gentiles God has granted repentance that leads to life.”

The Church in Antioch

Now those who had been scattered by the persecution that broke out when Stephen was killed traveled as far as Phoenicia, Cyprus and Antioch, spreading the word only among Jews.

 Some of them, however, men from Cyprus and Cyrene, went to Antioch and began to speak to Greeks also, telling them the good news about the Lord Jesus. The Lord’s hand was with them, and a great number of people believed and turned to the Lord.

News of this reached the church in Jerusalem, and they sent Barnabas to Antioch. When he arrived and saw what the grace of God had done, he was glad and encouraged them all to remain true to the Lord with all their hearts. He was a good man, full of the Holy Spirit and faith, and a great number of people were brought to the Lord.

Then Barnabas went to Tarsus to look for Saul, and when he found him, he brought him to Antioch. So for a whole year Barnabas and Saul met with the church and taught great numbers of people. The disciples were called Christians first at Antioch.

During this time some prophets came down from Jerusalem to Antioch. One of them, named Agabus, stood up and through the Spirit predicted that a severe famine would spread over the entire Roman world. (This happened during the reign of Claudius.)

The disciples, as each one was able, decided to provide help for the brothers and sisters living in Judea. This they did, sending their gift to the elders by Barnabas and Saul.

By the time we get through the end of chapter 12 next week, we are going to see the church do four key things as it’s getting off the ground.

·      Proclaim

·      Provide

·      Pray

·      Endure

Today, we are going to talk about the first two.

The Church Proclaims (invitation)

We have seen multiple times in Acts how important it was that God’s people understood the universal invitation to all people to become part of the Kingdom of God. They had to set aside cultural prejudice (Gentiles) and religious prejudice (Samaritans) as they took the good news of the Gospel to “the ends of the earth.” They are living out the reality that the Gospel of the Kingdom is not a possession for God’s people to guard; it’s an invitation to extend to all.

No more favoritism or discrimination. No one was too high to need the gospel, or too low to receive it. No one was a lost cause; no one was too far gone to deserve it. The result?

“A great number believed and turned to the Lord.”

The Spirit was already ahead of the church. It wasn’t the church’s job to decide who would or could be included; it was the church’s job to discern where God was already inviting people and join in with what God was already doing. And it turns out, God was doing this everywhere.

This is an important contrast to empires, which build nations by drawing lines, excluding outsiders, and building a hierarchy of value (who is most important vs. least important).

Jesus creates a Kingdom where insiders invite everyone outside to join, from every tribe, nation and tongue, with all sharing the value due the imago dei.[1] Paul insisted that an important part of God’s plan would be revealed when this kind of generous invitation happened.

Therefore, remember that formerly you who are Gentiles by birth… remember that at that time you were separate from Christ, excluded from citizenship in Israel and foreigners to the covenants of the promise, without hope and without God in the world.

But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far away have been brought near by the blood of Christ. For he himself is our peace, who has made the two groups one and has destroyed the barrier, the dividing wall of hostility…

 His purpose was to create in himself one new humanity out of the two, thus making peace, and in one body to reconcile both of them to God through the cross, by which he put to death their hostility. He came and preached peace to you who were far away and peace to those who were near.

For through him we both have access to the Father by one Spirit. Consequently, you are no longer foreigners and strangers, but fellow citizens with God’s people and also members of his household, built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, with Christ Jesus himself as the chief cornerstone. (Ephesians 2:11-20)

Something similar appears in Galatians 3:

So in Christ Jesus you are all children of God through faith, for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. (Galatians 3:26-28)

The early church stopped asking, ‘Should they be invited?’ They should. “Can they be integrated?” They can. Through the transforming power of Jesus, we are all made one in Christ.

The Church Provides (care)

We see at the end of Acts 11 that a famine is coming, and the church in Antioch sends relief to Judea. The Kingdom of God invites us into a new economic reality. It’s not a world with a hard line between “this is mine” and “that is yours.” We have been initiated into a community of “us” and “ours.” I don’t mean this like Communism. I mean this like what Christ-like communalism demands.

Biblical communalism is the voluntary sharing of possessions, resources, and life, driven by agape love and spiritual unity, as practiced by the early Jerusalem church. It emphasizes collective responsibility, supporting the needy, and prioritizing the community's well-being over personal interests, rooted in the concept of koinonia (fellowship/communion).[2]

We can talk more in Message+ what this could look like today. For now, let’s just focus on the principle. Generosity is not optional for sincere followers of Jesus. We follow a generous Savior, and we pay it forward, sometimes literally.

So, put those two together, and this is what it looks like when the Way of the Lamb takes shape in a community:

  • Its invitation is as wide as the world. The doors of the church stay open just like the gates to the city in Revelation.

  • It gives instead of hoards. Money and things are not goals in the Kingdom of Heaven; they are gifts, tools to be used on God’s behalf.

                                                             * * * * *

Time to make it practical.

First, are we inviting everyone to meet Jesus and join us in feasting at the table of His goodness and love? According to the Bible, “whosever will may come.” That’s a pretty broad category. There is no, “Except THAT Samaritan,” or,“Except THAT sinner.” No one is outside the reach of God’s love, and no one should be beyond the gospel reach of the church.

And since that is true, we have to be prepared. We have to be conscious that we are prepping ourselves for conversations, friendships, and presence that will introduce people to Jesus. In fact, the time of preparation might be as important as the important moments we prepare for.

When I was in my 30s, playing and coaching basketball, I had a temper problem. I got far too many technicals and said way too many dumb and hurtful things. I was youth pastor then, and occasionally preaching. One Sunday I got up to preach, and as I was preaching, I noticed a referee in the audience. That ref had teed me up – and I had deserved it. My first thought was, “Oh, no.” My second thought was, “I’ll bet we never see him here again.” And I was right.

There could have been any number of reasons he didn’t come back, but I know the Holy Spirit started doing some work in me that day. Turns out it wasn’t “just basketball.” It was a particular kind of witness that would either make smooth the road that leads toward Jesus or make it really tough to navigate.

So what does good prep look like in terms of how we live in the world? How do we steward our ordinary moments to pave the way for an expansion of the Kingdom of God?

·  Practicing hospitality of the head (what we think) and the heart (how we feel). We refuse to caricature people in our minds, whether it’s a group of people or an individual. We assume the best until proven otherwise. We do the internal work of putting our best foot forward internally before we actually move forward toward others.

·  Refusing to use derogatory terms or nicknames. I’ve had way too many people talk to me about how put off they have become because someone casually calls Democrats “Demoncrats” or MAGA folks “maggots,” and just like that, the conversation – and the people  - are not safe. It’s not just the words. It’s what was revealed about the heart. Even when culture normalizes contempt, we don’t. We don’t dehumanize or mock people made in the image of God—not politicians, not neighbors, not enemies.

·  Building a reputation as a protector of the broken, the poor, and the powerless. When people think of us, they should think, “I think I can trust them. I’ve seen how they live and heard what they say, and that’s the kind of person I trust.” We don’t just talk about compassion; we live and speak compassionately. We send a consistent message that abuse, exploitation and dehumanization is not okay, and we shine that light into darkness.

·  Being quick to repentance and slow to defensiveness. When we get it wrong - and we will - we own it without excuses. A humble apology can do more for the witness of Jesus than a flawless argument. Humility is such a compelling quality.

·  Creating spaces where people can belong before they believe.
We don’t require people to have everything figured out or get all cleaned up before they sit at the table. Jesus didn’t wait. Neither do we. After all, we are all on a journey together. Nobody waited for us to have it all together, or else they would still be waiting.

·  Refusing to rush people’s stories. Transformation is not instant. We walk with people at the pace of grace, not the speed of our expectations. That’s messy, but you know what? Some was or still is taking the journey with you too.

·  Speaking hope to the hopeless. The world already knows how to be afraid. What it’s starving for is hopeful people who can point toward a better way, and embody it. Everybody knows the world is dark; they are looking for someone who can point them toward the true light. This might start with saying, “Don’t worry; I see the darkness too.” It just doesn’t stop there. It includes, “I care deeply about it, which is why I follow the way of Jesus.”

This is what it looks like when the life of Jesus actually takes root in a community and expresses itself in the transformed lives of his followers.

Second, how are we doing in offering generous provision?  We all have different economic situations, and I’m not going to tell you what it looks like for you to be generous. That’s between you and God. I’m here to remind us to be sensitive to the Holy Spirit as we consider how the early church flourished. How might this kind of provision and generosity actually look like in our lives, so that we practically experience living in a community whose generosity cares for those around them?

·  Giving from our first fruits, not leftovers. This is a principle about the heart that works no matter what we have. We at least try to plan for generosity at the beginning of our budget. It’s not an afterthought that we hope to remember; it’s something we prioritize and hope to do.

·  Letting our generosity stretch us. If it’s never uncomfortable, it’s probably not forming us. There will likely be moments – maybe there should be moments? - where we feel it when our faith and finances intersect.

·  Viewing everything we have as entrusted, not owned. It’s not mine to protect; it’s God’s to steward. We’re managers of God’s provision. If we only think of ownership, we are going to think of rights for ourselves (and surely there is a place for that). But if we think of stewardship, we are going to think of responsibilities not just for ourselves, but for those around us also.

·  Remembering that generosity forms us, not just helps others. This isn’t just about meeting needs “out there.” It’s about what God is shaping in here—loosening our grip on the love of money, expanding our trust that God and God’s people will care for us; but ultimately, aligning us with Jesus.


By proclaiming the good news and providing for those around us, Jesus is transforming us into a people who trust God and love others freely.


________________________________________________________________________

[1] Revelation 7:9

[2] This was a good summary overview from Google.

What The Crucifixion Reveals About God (Luke 23:26-49; Mark 15:41; Matthew 27:32-56; John 19:16-37)

We are going to cover a lot of text today about the crucifixion of Jesus before we talk about the Resurrection on Easter Sunday.


So they took Jesus, carrying his own cross. As they led him away, the soldiers forced a passerby to carry his cross, Simon of Cyrene. (He was the father of Alexander and Rufus.) They placed the cross on his back and made him carry it behind Jesus.[1] Two other criminals[2] were also led away to be executed with him.

A great number of the people followed him, among them women who were mourning and wailing for him. But Jesus turned to them and said, “Daughters of Jerusalem,[3] do not weep for me, but weep for yourselves and for your children.

For the coming destruction is certain[4]: The days are coming when they will say, ‘Blessed are the barren, the wombs that never bore children, and the breasts that never nursed!’ Then they will begin to say to the mountains, ‘Fall on us!’ and to the hills, ‘Cover us! ’

They came to a place called Golgotha (which means “Place of the Skull”) and offered Jesus wine mixed with gall (myrrh) to drink. But after tasting it, he would not drink it.[5]

At ‘the third hour,’ nine o’clock in the morning[6] they crucified him there, along with the two other criminals, one on his right and one on his left, with Jesus in the middle. And Jesus said, “Father, forgive them, for they don’t know what they are doing.”

Pilate also had a notice of the charge against him written and fastened to the cross above his head, which read: “Jesus the Nazarene, the king of the Jews.” Thus many of the Jewish residents of Jerusalem read this notice, because the place where Jesus was crucified was near the city, and the notice was written in Aramaic, Latin, and Greek.

Then the chief priests of the Jews said to Pilate, “Do not write, ‘The king of the Jews,’ but rather, ‘This man said, I am king of the Jews.’ “Pilate answered, “What I have written, I have written.” Now when the soldiers crucified Jesus, they took his clothes and made four shares, one for each soldier, and the tunic remained.

 (Now the tunic was seamless, woven from top to bottom as a single piece.)[7] So the soldiers said to one another, “Let’s not tear it, but throw dice to see who will get it.” This took place to fulfill the scripture that says, “They divided my garments among them, and for my clothing they threw dice.”[8] So the soldiers did these things and then sat down and kept guard over him there.

The people also stood there watching. Those who passed by defamed Jesus, shaking their heads and saying, “Aha! You who claimed to be able to destroy the temple and rebuild it in three days,[9] save yourself! If you are God’s Son, come down from the cross!”  In the same way even the chief priests – together with the experts in the law and elders – were mocking him among themselves.

“He saved others, but he cannot save himself! If he is the Christ of God, his chosen one, the king of Israel, let him come down from the cross now, that we may see and believe in him! He trusts in God – let God, if he wants to, deliver him now because he said, ‘I am God’s Son’!”

The soldiers also mocked Jesus, coming up and offering him sour wine, and saying, “If you are the king of the Jews, save yourself!” The robbers who were crucified with him also spoke abusively to him. One of the criminals who was hanging there railed at him, saying, “Aren’t you the Christ? Save yourself and us!”

But the other rebuked him, saying, “Don’t you fear God, since you are under the same sentence of condemnation? And we rightly so, for we are getting what we deserve for what we did, but this man has done nothing wrong. ”Then he said, “Jesus, remember me when you come in your kingdom.”  And Jesus said to him, “I tell you the truth, today you will be with me in paradise.” [10]

Now standing beside Jesus’ cross were his mother; his mother’s sister, Mary, the wife of Clopas; and Mary Magdalene. So when Jesus saw his mother and the disciple whom he loved standing there, he said to his mother, “Woman, look, here is your son!” He then said to his disciple, “Look, here is your mother!” From that very time the disciple took Jesus’ mother into his own home.

Now when it was about noon, darkness came over the whole land[11] until three in the afternoon, and the sun’s light failed.[12] Around three o’clock Jesus cried out with a loud voice, “Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachthani?” (“My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?”)[13]

When some of the bystanders heard it, they said, “Listen, he is calling for Elijah!” [14]After this Jesus, realizing that by this time everything was completed, said (in order to fulfill the scripture)[15], “I am thirsty!” 

A jar full of sour wine was there, so someone immediately ran, soaked a sponge with sour wine, put it on a hyssop stick[16], and lifted it to his mouth to drink. But the rest said, “Leave him alone! Let’s see if Elijah will come to take him down and save him.”

When he had received the sour wine,[17] Jesus cried out again with a loud voice, “It is completed!” Then Jesus bowed his head, and calling out with a loud voice, said, “Father, into your hands I commit my spirit!” And after he said this, he breathed his last and gave up his spirit.

Now when the centurion, who stood in front of him, saw how he died, he praised God and said, “Certainly this man was innocent!” Just then the temple curtain was split from top to bottom.[18] The earth shook and the rocks were split apart.[19]

Now when the centurion and those with him who were guarding Jesus saw the earthquake and what took place, they were extremely terrified and said, “Truly this one was God’s Son!”[20] And all the crowds that had assembled for this spectacle, when they saw what had taken place, returned home in sorrow and repentance.

All those who knew Jesus stood watching from a distance. Among them were Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James the younger and of Joses (Joseph), and Salome, the mother of the sons of Zebedee. When Jesus was in Galilee, they had followed him and given him support. Many other women who had come up with him to Jerusalem were there too.

Then, because it was the day of preparation, so that the bodies should not stay on the crosses on the Sabbath (for that Sabbath was an especially important one. the Jewish leaders asked Pilate to have the victims’ legs broken and the bodies taken down.[21]

So the soldiers came and broke the legs of the two men who had been crucified with Jesus, first the one and then the other. But when they came to Jesus and saw that he was already dead, they did not break his legs. But one of the soldiers pierced his side with a spear, and blood and water flowed out immediately.

The person who saw it has testified (and his testimony is true, and he knows that he is telling the truth), so that you also may believe. For these things happened so that the scripture would be fulfilled, “Not a bone of his will be broken.”[22]And again, “They will look on the one whom they have pierced.”[23]

* * * * * 

There are a number of things we could focus on.

  • Jesus’ deep care for other people even as he is going to the cross.

  • His incredible forgiveness.

  • The timing of his death as a Passover Lamb kicking off the Jewish celebration of deliverance from slavery.

I would like to focus on what is happening with all the citations of Psalm 22. Jesus quotes the first line; the gospel writers keep referencing it. Apparently, we are supposed to know this Psalm. Jesus invokes this psalm to refer to himself, but David probably didn’t realize he was pointing toward Jesus. At that point he was speaking about himself. So, not everything maps perfectly with Jesus. But think about how Jesus and the gospel writers hyperlinked to this passage as we read. (I left out a few paragraphs that weren’t as closely connected to my focus for the sake of time in my sermon).

Psalm 22

 My God, my God, why have you forsaken me? Why are you so far from saving me,
    so far from my cries of anguish? My God, I cry out by day, but you do not answer,
    by night, but I find no rest.

 Yet you are enthroned as the Holy One; you are the one Israel praises.  In you our ancestors put their trust; they trusted and you delivered them. To you they cried out and were saved; in you they trusted and were not put to shame.

But I am a worm and not a man, scorned by everyone, despised by the people. All who see me mock me; they hurl insults, shaking their heads. “He trusts in the Lord,” they say, “let the Lord rescue him. Let him deliver him, since he delights in him….”

Many bulls surround me; strong bulls of Bashan encircle me. Roaring lions that tear their prey open their mouths wide against me. I am poured out like water, and all my bones are out of joint. My heart has turned to wax; it has melted within me.

My mouth is dried up like a potsherd, and my tongue sticks to the roof of my mouth; you lay me in the dust of death. Dogs surround me, a pack of villains encircles me; they pierce my hands and my feet. All my bones are on display; people stare and gloat over me. They divide my clothes among them and cast lots for my garment.

 But you, Lord, do not be far from me. You are my strength; come quickly to help me. Deliver me from the sword, my precious life from the power of the dogs. Rescue me from the mouth of the lions; save me from the horns of the wild oxen.

 I will declare your name to my people; in the assembly I will praise you. You who fear the Lord, praise him! All you descendants of Jacob, honor him! Revere him, all you descendants of Israel! For he has not despised or scorned the suffering of the afflicted one; he has not hidden his face from him, but has listened to his cry for help...

All the ends of the earth will remember and turn to the Lord, and all the families of the nations will bow down before him, for dominion belongs to the Lord and he rules over the nations. All the rich of the earth will feast and worship; all who go down to the dust will kneel before him -those who cannot keep themselves alive.

Posterity will serve him; future generations will be told about the Lord. They will proclaim his righteousness, declaring to a people yet unborn: He has done it!

I want to land this morning on the unrelenting, self-sacrificing, overwhelming love of God for sinners as expressed by the crucifixion. Usually, this takes the approach of focusing on what Jesus suffered so that evil – sin, death, hades and the grave – could be defeated. That in itself is incredibly important and fantastically good news. But I want to look at it from a different angle this morning by looking at the interaction between God the Father and God the Son.[24]

Growing up, I was taught that God had forsaken Jesus on the cross because Jesus said, “Why have you forsaken me?” It seemed like the plain reading of the text. Why would God do this? All the sin. A key verse from which we get this idea is found in Habakkuk 1:13:

“Your eyes are too pure to even look at evil. You cannot turn Your face toward injustice.”

And the Christian claim is that, on the cross, Jesus in some sense took all of our sin into himself as a divine scapegoat[25] so that we could become righteous.

"God made him who had no sin to be sin for us, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God." (2 Corinthians 5:21)

If a holy God cannot apparently even look at sin, and Jesus had taken upon himself all that sin, God the Father had to look away. He really had forsaken God the Son. This already concerns me theologically: can the Trinity really be divided against itself? But it turns out we just need to read more of the text.  Let’s just keep reading Habakkuk 1:13.

“Your eyes are too pure to even look at evil. You cannot turn Your face toward injustice.
So why do You stand by
and watch those who act treacherously?”

It seems as if the first part reminds us of God’s holy and pure nature, and the second part assures us that God’s perfection does not mean he can’t be present and engaged with an imperfect world. Jesus is the fullest expression of that. If God couldn’t even look at evil and injustice, it would make no sense that God incarnated in Jesus into a world where he would be surrounded by evil and injustice. But God did that – and more. Paul reminded the church in Corinth that, on the cross,

“…God was reconciling the world to himself in Christ, not counting people’s sins against them...” (2 Corinthians 5:19)

The Trinity was never divided. Yawheh was not the two-faced god Janus, with one face turned from us and another face turned toward us. Note where Psalm 22 leads us. After that opening cry about God forsaking him, David comes around.

“For he has not despised or scorned the suffering of the afflicted one; he has not hidden his face from him, but has listened to his cry for help.”

What does God do when there is a world full of sin? He moves in closer. He makes himself more obvious. Jesus lovingly rubbed shoulders with sinful humanity on his way to saving them from the devastating wages of sin. He took our sin into himself and defeated it once and for all.

God is not a Father who turns his face away and leaves in the presence of sin. God is a Father whose love reaches through that mess of sin, grabs his image bearers by the hand, cleans them up, heals them, and sets them free from the bondage of sin and death,

“so that he might present the church to himself in splendor, without spot or wrinkle or any such thing, that she might be holy and without blemish.” (Ephesians 5:27)

I like that plan a lot. And God is not going to be stingy in His grace.

“And I, [Jesus] if I am lifted up from the earth, will draw (literally “drag”)[26] all mankind unto Myself.” (John 12:32)

Our sin doesn’t make Jesus push us away. Our sin causes Jesus to reach for us to draw us to himself.

I don’t know what your past record of sin or current struggle with sin is. I just know that the cross reminds us that the Father has not turned His face away from you. Jesus is drawing you, me, everyone in the world, in whatever state of sin we are in, to gather at the foot of the cross for salvation, healing, restoration, and communion with God and each other.

I don’t know what kind of evil is trying to or has seduced you and threatens to control you. I just know that Jesus is drawing you to himself, not pushing you away. God has not turned his face from you; God has always set his face toward you.[27]

There may be shame (because sin is never something to be proud of), and hurt (because sin always leaves a mark), and hiding so that we are not exposed (#gardenofeden).

But God is convicting you, not shaming you. God wants to heal you, not double down on the hurt. God wants us to move toward Him, not hide from Him.

God is the Perfect Father who runs with joy to embrace even his most prodigal children.[28] God is the Good Shepherd who will search for that lost sheep until He finds it.[29] God is the farmer who saw a treasure – you - in a field of the world, and He gave all that he had to rescue me and you.[30]

While we were yet sinners, Jesus finished the path of cruciform love: giving his life so that we could live.


____________________________________________________________________________

[1] Simon of Cyrene was perhaps from a Jewish community in Libya. Church history says He became a disciple of Jesus and a missionary. Some speculate that the Rufus in Mark 15:21 is also in Paul's letter to the Romans.

[2] Likely Zealots, as crucifixion was the penalty for insurrection.

[3] Some women in Jerusalem “were in the habit of soothing the last hours of these condemned ones with narcotics and anodynes. These kindly offices were apparently not forbidden by the Roman authorities.” (Pulpit Commentary)

[4] A prophecy about the fall of the Temple and the death of a million Jews at Roman hands  in A.D. 70.

[5] Most commentators believe this was so that he did not avoid the full cup of pain and suffering.

[6] it aligns with the timing of the Jewish morning sacrifice in the Temple of a sacrificial lamb. 

[7] “Although the Old Testament does not tell us the high priest’s robe was seamless, Josephus does: “Now this vesture was not composed of two pieces, nor was it sewed together upon the shoulders and the sides, but it was one long vestment so woven as to have an aperture for the neck.”  John 19:24 tells us that the soldiers did not tear Jesus’ robe. Exodus 28:32 forbade the tearing of the high priest’s robe. John points out another quality of Jesus’ tunic in 19:23: it was woven from top to bottom, anōthen (ἄνωθεν)… Surely it is not by chance that John 19:23 tells us Jesus’ chitōn was woven from top to bottom (anōthen). It must mean something. This garment is not just any garment, but is drawing attention to some divine connection.  (“Jesus as High Priest: the Significance of the Seamless Robe.” Thomas Lane, stpaulcenter.com

[8] Psalm 22

[9] John 2:19

[10] There was no punctuation in the original manuscript. It could also read, “I tell you today, you will be with me in paradise. Church tradition, repeated by the likes of John Chrysostom and Augustine, claims that the two thieves were part of a band of robbers led by Gestas (the mocker) and Dismas (the believer) who held up Jesus’ family on their way to Egypt. The robbers were astonished to find expensive gifts of gold, frankincense, and myrrh. In the legend Dismas was deeply affected by the infant, and stopped the robbery by offering a bribe to Gestas. Upon departing, the young Dismas was reported to have said: “0 most blessed of children, if ever a time should come when I should crave thy mercy, remember me and forget not what has passed this day.” (https://beyondthesestonewalls.com/posts/dismas-crucified-to-the-right-paradise-lost-and-found)

[11] Most scholars connect this darkness with Amos 8:9-10: “And in that day, declares the Lord GOD, I will make the sun go down at noon, and I will darken the earth in the daytime. I will turn your feasts into mourning (think the Passover festival) and all your songs into lamentation. I will cause everyone to wear sackcloth and every head to be shaved. I will make it like a time of mourning for an only son, and its outcome like a bitter day.”

[12] “An account of it is given by Phlegon of Tralles, a second century historian… who says that, in the fourth year of the 202nd Olympiad, there was” a great and remarkable eclipse of the sun, above any that had happened before. At the sixth hour the day was turned into the darkness of night, so that stars were seen in the heaven; and there was a great earthquake in Bithynia, which overthrew many houses in the city of Nicaea.” Phlegon also mentions an earthquake…. Dionysius says that he saw this phenomenon at Heliopolis, in Egypt, and he is reported to have exclaimed, "Either the God of nature, the Creator, is suffering, or the universe dissolving." (Pulpit Commentary)

[13] The opening line from Psalm 22.

[14] There was a Jewish expectation that Elijah would return before the Messiah.

[15] Psalm 22 again.

[16] The hyssop may symbolize the cleansing and purification that Jesus' sacrifice provides. 

[17] Sour wine fulfills the prophecy in Psalm 69:21, which states, "They gave me vinegar to drink instead of wine." 

[18] No longer were only a few allowed into the ‘presence of God.’ Now everyone could access it.

[19] “And tombs were opened and, like Lazarus, many saints who had very recently died were raised out of their tombs after Jesus’ resurrection and went into the holy city, Jerusalem, and appeared to many people.” It is probable that they were persons who had recently died, and they appear to have been known in Jerusalem.” (Barnes’ Notes On The Bible). In this sense, this was probably similar to Lazarus: they had recently died, but had not yet been properly interred.

[20] “Tradition affirms that the centurion's name was Longinus, that he became a devoted follower of Christ, preached the faith, and died a martyr's death. “(Pulpit Commentary)

[21] It was the Sabbath beginning the Feast of Unleavened Bread, in which the Israelites celebrated their deliverance from slavery in Egypt. Because of the need to act quickly.

[22] Psalm 34:20

[23] Zechariah 12:10

[24] Trinitarian language can be really confusing. Generally, a Trinitarian God is described as One essence in Three persons. The three Persons are inseparable and live in one another, completely encompassing each other, meaning they are never separated, divided, or found apart. As God has one nature, every action of the Trinity is one, originating with the Father, through the Son, and realized in the Holy Spirit. Thus the Three are one not only because what they are is one and the same, but because their divine union allows of no separation or duality or division whatsoever. (I got some of this language from “The Trinity,” at oca.org. 

[25] A live goat chosen by lot on the Day of Atonement (Yom Kippur) to symbolically carry the sins of the Israelites into the wilderness, effectively removing them. See Leviticus 16.

[26] The image is that of a fisherman casting out a net and “drawing” all the fish back in.

[27] And if we want to be like Jesus, we will never turn our face away from those toward whom God has set his face.

[28] Luke 15

[29] Luke 15; Matthew 18

[30] One way of reading the parable in Matthew 13.

ARMAGEDDON, END TIMES, AND THE BOOK OF REVELATION

I noted last week that NOT to address the war with Iran seems like ignoring the elephant in the room, so I am going to talk about it, but not in terms of its merits - or lack thereof, depending on your opinion. Google “Just War Theory Iran” or some combination of words like that and take some time to study and reflect.

I want to address something different. Many people are asking questions like this right now:

“Is what’s happening in the Middle East a fulfillment of prophecy? Are we watching Revelation unfold on the news? Does this war with Iran mean the world is approaching the final battle of Armageddon? Should I be looking out for the Antichrist? How should we be responding?” [1]

If you have grown up in evangelical circles, war in the Middle East - especially if it involves Israel - has always led to speculation about eschatology (end times study). At least 20 countries are now involved; the global economy is stumbling; there are murmurs of WWIII. It feels potentially apocalyptic.

Since most of the “end times” text comes from the book of Revelation[2], I am going to condense my 30+ episode sermon series from 2021 into one sermon.

* * * * *

Faithful, Bible-believing Christians have interpreted Revelation differently throughout church history.

  • Preterist: Revelation’s events happened in the 1st century.

  • Poetic/Theopoetic: The text is poetic language expressing ultimate truths about God, evil, and history.

  • Theopolitical: The text is a form of political protest and dissent against the Roman empire[3], a prophetic critique of Empire power.

  • Pastoral/Prophetic: The text gives a timeless call for hope and faithfulness in the face of inevitable, ongoing conflict with all empires and their evils, injustices, and misguided allegiances.

  • Predictive/Futurist: The text reveals future events that will happen at the end of time (“end times”). This is part of what is called Dispensationalism.[4]

For Christians raised in evangelical culture in the United States, Revelation has typically been taught in the Predictive/Futurist model: a roadmap of future wars, the Antichrist and geopolitical alliances that usher in the return of Jesus. #LeftBehind

It may surprise you to know that this view is not very old. The idea that Revelation provides a precise geopolitical map of the End Times developed through John Nelson Darby (1800-1882). He was heavily influenced by Margaret McDonald, a Scottish woman who claimed to have had visions of a pre-tribulation rapture in 1830. Soon, the Scofield Reference Bible (1909) was the first Bible to have footnotes for this Dispensational approach.

Do with that what you will. My point is that the earliest Christians did not read Revelation through that lens. For them, Revelation was a combination of the first 4 approaches. It was a message about how to avoid compromise, remain faithful, and live with hope in the midst of what was happening in their lifetime. I am going to try to explain that this morning so we can see what John’s audience saw, hear what they heard, and hold to the hope they had.

* * * * *

In the first century, Rome claimed a divine leader and an empire blessed by the gods. They had symbols everywhere to remind people of their allegiance: flags, statues of the emperor, coins with Caesar’s image, temples where incense burned in his honor, and citizens expected to say three simple words: “Caesar is Lord.”

Christians refused. Instead, they said: “Jesus is Lord.” That confession was deeply theological – and political. It put them at odds with a Rome that demanded allegiance. As you might imagine, the Empire was not happy with this turn of events, and life got really hard for Christians. As they suffered, there was a temptation to give up and join Rome.

Revelation was written to reveal spiritual realities behind the political power and false promises of Rome, and to help Christians remain hopeful and faithful when empires threatened their lives and demanded their allegiance.

John used apocalyptic literature[5] to communicate this. He narrated a vision through creative storytelling that is heavily symbolic, full of exaggerated imagery. Apocalyptic writing is less like a political news report and more like the political cartoons on the editorial page. I’ll try to show you what that looks like with some images I am going to use.

Revelation Was Written to First Century Christians Living in the Roman Empire, specifically to seven real churches in Asia Minor (Ephesus, Smyrna, Pergamum, Thyatira, Sardis, Philadelphia, Laodicea). It was written for us, but not to us. If the book only made sense thousands of years later, then it failed its first readers. It had to make sense first in their context, and second in ours.

John’s audience would not have seen the prophetic nature of Revelation as foretelling about future events 1000s of years down the road. After all, Jesus had kept telling them, in their moment, to look out for what was going to happen in the Last Days (Matthew 24, Mark 13, Luke 21). John, himself, writing in 1 John 2:18, made it clear:

Dear children, this is the last hour; and as you have heard that the antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come. This is how we know it is the last hour.[6]

John’s audience read Revelation’s prophetic voice as forthtelling,  interpreting the world’s current events theologically to give them wisdom and hope.

Revelation Is Primarily a Revelation of Jesus.

“The revelation of Jesus Christ…” (Revelation 1:1)

It is a revelation of Jesus first and foremost. That’s where the hope comes from. Revelation has wonderful imagery about Jesus:

  • The faithful witness (1:5)

  • The slain Lamb (5:6)

  • The one who conquers by sacrifice (5:9–10)

  • The rider whose robe is dipped in his own blood (19:13)

  • The maker of new things from all that was broken (21:5)

The dominant image is that of a Lamb who was slain. Even when John hears a lion, when he looks, it’s a lamb. (5:7-9) Once the Lion has been revealed to be the Lamb, we never again find Christ referred to as a Lion, though he’s referred to as the Lamb twenty-seven more times.[7] It’s reinforcing a point Jesus made in his lifetime. When the people waved the palm branches of the violent Zealots to welcome him into Jerusalem (Luke 19), Jesus cried for them and their vain pursuit of peace. That’s not the kind of Lord Jesus is, and it’s not how he will usher in his kingdom then or in the future.

 

Revelation Exposes Empires. Revelation’s central claims would have been shocking to people overwhelmed by Rome’s power and grandeur:

  • Rome claims to be blessed and ruled by divinity. John says Rome is a beast rising from the sea, empowered by a propaganda-fueled dragon that demands worship. John uses Rome/Babylon as stand-ins for all earthly kingdoms, nations, and empires. Any political authority that demands an unquestioning or ultimate allegiance, any ruler who relies on violent, destructive domination to rule, any earthly system that exalts itself as being a savior -  they are all trying to stand in a place that belongs to God, and Jesus has something to say about that.[8]

  • Rome says it brings peace with the sword (Pax Romana). John says it is bathed in violence.Revelation unmasks false peace that trusts in violence, the kind of path that made Jesus weep when he entered Jerusalem, as it was clear that was the path the people wanted him to take. (Luke 19:41-44) Jesus is establishing a new kind of peace and way of peace (often referred to as Pax Christi, or peace of Christ). 

  • Rome claims to be like a stunningly beautiful woman (the goddess Roma). John says she’s a blood-soaked, cruel seductress (played by Babylon). Babylon is covered with the blood of the saints (Revelation 17), suggesting many had already been devoured by the Empire, either willingly or forcefully.

  • Rome says Caesar is Lord and Savior. Revelation says only Jesus is Lord and Savior. Empires will say, “I alone can save you,” but it’s hollow arrogance. Jesus alone can save us.

  • Rome conquers by taking the lives of others so it can live. Revelation says the Lamb conquers through giving his own life so others can live.

Revelation is unmasking “how the sausage is made” in empires for an audience in danger of being overwhelmed by power or seduced by pleasure. The kingdoms of this world often look glorious on the outside, but from God’s perspective they are beastly. How do we follow Jesus when the nation we live in demands unquestioning loyalty - and compromise? First, we must see it for what it is.


* * * * *

“Is what’s happening in the Middle East a fulfillment of prophecy? Are we watching Revelation unfold on the news? Does this war with Iran mean the world is approaching the final battle of Armageddon? Should I be looking out for the Antichrist? How should we be responding?”

I will offer answers based on my understanding of how Revelation is meant to be read. Others have differing opinions, and we can hold those and still be on Team Jesus. I’m a big fan of listening to what a variety of people have to say and praying for discernment, and I encourage you to do the same.

Are we watching Revelation unfold on the news? Very much so – in the sense that John warned us about empires and how they work. They will either violently bully us to control us, or they will try to seduce us and distract us from Jesus and His Kingdom with worldly pleasure and power.[9] 

It’s a tale as old as history, for all of history. Revelation warns all Christians, in all places, at all times, about the beastliness and seductiveness of nations. No one is exempt. With that in mind, hear me carefully.

In today’s headlines, it’s a warning about Iran and the U.S., Israel[10] and Lebanon, Russia and Ukraine – name the country. Human governments have a beastliness and seductiveness that we must resist. The legacies of Rome and Babylon live on in their empire children. The people of God’s Kingdom stand in their midst as counter-cultural salt and light, shining cities on a hill surrounded by darkness.

Is this a fulfillment of prophecy? If by that we mean that John warned us about what to expect in the times we are living, then yes. Are we moving closer to the end of history? Of course. Eventually, the cycle will end. Maybe we are there. Someday we will be, for sure.

I’m just not convinced John was trying to give us signs to help us figure out “the day and hour” that Jesus will return when Jesus himself said nobody will know (Matthew 24:36).[11] Jesus didn’t seem concerned about being too specific, so I want to encourage us not to be too concerned about it either. If Jesus said, “Be ready,” to an audience 2,000 years ago, we might still have quite a while to wait, and we should still be ready. 

Should I be looking out for the Antichrist? Yes, as the church has been for 2,000 years. The Antichrist does not get a ‘shout out’ in Revelation, but John does in 1 John 2. After he talks about living in the Last Days, he warns:

“Whoever denies that Jesus is the Christ. Such a person is the antichrist—denying the Father and the Son.” (1 John 2:22)

He also revealed where to look for them:

“They went out from us, but they did not really belong to us. For if they had belonged to us, they would have remained with us; but their going showed that none of them belonged to us.”

We don’t need to look “out there” for an antichrist. Apparently, the call will come from inside the house.

Does this war with Iran mean the world is approaching the Battle of Armageddon? A very popular speaker on End Times thinks so.[12] He claimed that Russia, Turkey, “what’s left of Iran” and other Muslim groups would soon invade Israel and be destroyed by God. Last week he prayed that,

“…God Almighty is brought onto the battlefield and the enemies of Zion and the enemies of the United States can be destroyed before our eyes. Let God arise and let his enemies be scattered.”[13]

The thing is, there is no battle between armies that happens at Armageddon, and God does not destroy the nations that gather. Let me explain.

Let’s say (for the sake of discussion) that at this point Revelation suddenly stops being full of symbolic apocalyptic imagery and is now meant to be read literally, like a (future) news report. That would be really different than how we read the rest of the book, but let’s grant a “future historical” reading.

The word “Armageddon” appears only once (Revelation 16:16), and no battle is described there. Nations gather, but nobody starts fighting. The confrontation happens in Revelation 19:11–21. A rider on a white horse –  Jesus - shows up. There is a confrontation, but not what one might expect.

“His eyes are like blazing fire, and on his head are many crowns. He has a name written on him that no one knows but he himself. He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God. The armies of heaven were following him, riding on white horses and dressed in fine linen, white and clean. Coming out of his mouth is a sharp sword with which to strike down the nations.”

The sword of the Spirit is the Word of God (Ephesians 6), which cuts sharper than any two-edged sword (Hebrews 4). The weapon is Jesus’ mouth is His Word. It’s truth. It’s the gospel. It’s the message that the love displayed on the cross has conquered all that is evil – sin, death, hell, the grave.

Jesus’ robe is already dipped in blood before the battle begins. Most scholars agree this must be his own blood, the blood of the cross. Jesus conquers the world the same way he conquered death: through sacrificial love. The Lamb wins by being slain so that death does not get the final word.

Meanwhile, all the bad guys are still there. All these nations from all over the earth intent on making war are all still there. Now what?

“Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies gathered together to wage war against the rider on the horse and his army. But the beast was captured, and with it the false prophet who had performed the signs on its behalf.”

The Beast and False Prophet – keep in mind that these are national symbols of violence and lies, not individuals - are bound and given over to judgment, and that’s it. Nobody draws a sword except Jesus, and it’s the sword of the spirit, the word of God. Even when Gog and Magog gather in Revelation 20, there is no battle between people.[14]

Even if I were to give the most literal reading to these passages, there is no battle at Armageddon where people fight people. There is no blood-soaked field of slaughtered pagans killed by righteous people or heavenly armies. When it is time for judgment, God does it, and it’s not a battlefield slaughter (Revelation 20).

Another famous pastor[15] once described Jesus’ return in Revelation this way.

“In Revelation, Jesus is a prize fighter with a tattoo down His leg, a sword in His hand and the commitment to make someone bleed. That is a guy I can worship. I cannot worship… a guy I can beat up.”

This is….so wrong. Jesus is not an MMA prize fighter; he fights evil with truth and cruciform love. Revelation does not show a returning Jesus with a commitment to make someone bleed; it reveals a slain Lamb who bled on our behalf. And I do worship a man who people not only beat up but also crucified, whose cruciform love swallowed up evil as a result of his sacrifice. Jesus willingly gave up his life to conquer the power of sin, death, hell and the grave. (1 Corinthians 15:55)

So, how do God’s people live in these times? How do we stay true in the midst of beasts, false prophets and the seducers that try to dirty our hearts and divide our allegiance? Revelation 12:11 tells us.

“They conquered [the accuser] by the blood of the Lamb and the word of their testimony, for they did not love their lives even unto death.”

The church participates in fighting against evil with the tools of the Kingdom: faithful witness, sacrificial love, a righteous presence (committed to “right”), perseverance, and a message of hope in Jesus. The church does not overcome the Evil One and his schemes by killing its enemies in the name of Jesus.

When the disciples asked Jesus to call down fire on a Samaritan town, he said “no” (Luke 9), then sent them there as missionaries (Luke 10). The church resists evil by being like Jesus. The point is to “Follow the Lamb wherever he goes.” (Revelation 14:4).

The story ends not with the destruction of the nations, but with the healing of the nations. The kings of the earth – the ones apparently gathered at Armageddon? - are shown coming to the celestial city, bringing “the glory and honor of the nations” (21:26). Water flows from the city for the healing of the nations. (Revelation 22:1-2)

Do you remember when we talked about the connection between theology and relationships? There is also a connection between eschatology and relationships.

If we think Armageddon needs to be bloody and violent – and if we think God expects us to bring it about – we might excitedly choose a bloody and violent path shouting the Crusades’ slogan of Deus Vult, “God wills it,”[16] and using the cross as a sign to militarily conquer. #constantine This is what happens when we think God conquers like Empires conquer.

But if we think the judgment that Jesus brings will also offer opportunity for repentance, healing, and restoration, then we will likely promote and pray for an approach that brings that about in the face of even national evil. This is what happens when we believe God conquers evil like Jesus conquered evil (because God is just like Jesus, because, well, God IS Jesus.)

How we think Jesus will return directs how we think we should prepare for it.


So, how are we to respond in this time?

John’s readers may find it hard to see in their neighbors on the street anything but cold, hostile stares and the threat of informing the authorities. They may be so aware of the present rule of the dragon, the monster and the false prophet that all they want is to escape, to be rescued, not to hold out to their neighbors God’s repeated and generous invitation.

But see they must, because the mercy of God is vast and his invitation wide as the world. Because he is who he is, the creator whose purposes are gloriously fulfilled in the slaughtered lamb, he will go on inviting and welcoming and pouring out the water of life for all the thirsty.  (N.T. Wright, Revelation For Everyone)

Empires will rise and fall. Wars will come and go. Nations will boast about their power. But above them all stands the Lamb who was slain and who has risen. Revelation reveals the self-giving, radically forgiving, co-suffering love of Jesus. The power of cruciform love gets the final word.

“Behold, I make all things new.” (Revelation 21:5)

* * * * * * * * *

[1] The fancy term for this in Christian circles is eschatology.

[2] Daniel is commonly cited also, as well as 2 Thessalonians 2.

[3] The Topical Lexicon at Biblehub.com describes empire this way: “In the biblical context, the term ‘empire’ refers to a large political unit or state, usually under a single sovereign authority, that extends its dominion over diverse peoples and territories.”

[4] Dispensationalists believe God works through distinct historical periods (dispensations), with a key distinction between His plan for Israel (earthly people) and the Church (heavenly people), viewing the Church as a temporary "parenthesis" in God's focus on Israel, culminating in a future earthly millennial kingdom where Israel's promises are fulfilled literally, and often embracing a pre-tribulation rapture. 

[5] A style of writing the really began to flourish during their exile.

[6] I think this likely applies to the “man of lawlessness” in 2 Thessalonians 2.

[7] “The Key To Understanding Revelation.” https://reknew.org/2016/05/key-understanding-revelation/

[8] In Reading Revelation Responsibly, Michael Gorman gives this definition for an empire: “Empire is a system of domination that both seduces the powerful, partly with the promise of more power, and intoxicates common people with its alluring wine, perhaps the false promise of security that supposedly comes from increasing prosperity and power.”

[9] It’s Orwell’s 1984 and Huxley’s Brave New World.

[10] If you find yourself resistant to the idea that Israel could be beastly, read the Old Testament, and why they went into exile.

[11] “It is not for you to know the times or seasons the Father has fixed.” Acts 1:7

[12] You can ask me who this is if you would like to know.

[13] Quoted here from a sermon streamed live on Facebook. https://theconversation.com/as-iran-war-expands-some-conservative-christians-interpret-the-conflict-through-biblical-prophecies-277488

[14] Gog and Magog appear to represent all nations deceived by Satan; numbered as "the sand of the sea" (20:8).

[15] You can ask me who this is if you would like to know.

[16] This Latin phrase was used as a battle cry and rallying cry during the First Crusade (1095–1099). It was  shouted by soldiers and clergy  alike in response to Pope Urban II’s speech calling for the Crusade in 1095. Theology even dictates geopolitical relationships between nations.

The Life and Death Of This Age #2 (Matthew 5; Luke 6)

The first three beatitudes provide a foundation for makarios, blessedness, participation in the life of this age that Jesus offers:

·      honest brokenness over our sin

·      humble mourning that leads to repentance and salvation

·      harnessed servanthood that leads to flourishing

These are three requirements for entering into aonios (eternal) life with God and building the kind of Kingdom God has planned. [1]

The desire for righteousness is next.  This is a worldview shift.  There are lots of things for which to hunger: riches, money, power, physical pleasure. But hungering for righteousness is hungering to know how to be in the world in the right way, and how to use the things we have in the right way. That’s a simple definition of righteousness. A hunger for “right”ness as defined by God. 

The fruit of brokenness, repentance and harnessed servanthood is a longing to live well in the path of rightness. And when we hunger to find this, “we will be filled." Our hunger has an answer: the Bread of Life. Jesus.

In this beatitude, for the first time, we see people actively seeking for God.  They are glad God pursued them; they are now pursuing Him as well. They are not content simply to be. These people are blessed, because God will “reward those who diligently seek him.”[2]

These people have a passion for righteousness in their own lives; however, it’s more than that. They long to see honesty, integrity, and justice in the church and the culture. These people desire not only that they may wholly do God's will from the heart, but also that justice may be done everywhere, and they actively engage in bringing this about. All unrighteousness grieves them and motivates them to display the goodness of righteousness through the testimony of their lives.

In contrast, the miserable are those who are hungry for the same old thing that never satisfied them before….. unrighteousness, I suppose, which will always leave us with what C.S. Lewis called “an ever increasing craving for an ever diminishing return.”[3] Those who hunger after unrighteousness always want more too. The difference is that what they are consuming is making them emptier. They “taste and see that X is fun, or entertaining, or gets me friends, or distracts me, or numbs me,” and don’t realize it is not good, and that it will never fill them, no matter how much they consume.

·  If you hunger for money, you always need one more dollar.

·  If you hunger for things, there is always one more toy or one size bigger of what you already have.

·  If you hunger for pleasure, you will long for the next experience before you are done with the first one.

·  If you hunger for fame, you need one more click on our website, one more follower, one more platform or you can’t rest.

If you hunger for power, there will never be enough people you control, or enough promotions, or enough positions of authority.

And there is a ripple effect here too. If the righteous long to see righteousness benefit the world and lead to the flourishing of others, the unrighteous build the opposite momentum.

· The longer they value things over people, the more they will value things over people.

· The longer they value power and control, the more they will value power and control.

· The longer they don’t care about others, the less they will care about others.

· The longer THEY determine what’s right for THEM #didGodreallysay?, the less they will care how their choices impact those around them.

This is why I keep saying that God’s righteous boundaries/path is for our good. Jesus didn’t come to squelch the life in us or take the joy out of the world; Jesus came that we might have abundant life. There is a reason joy came to the world when Jesus arrived in the world.

The next beatitude is the first category that gives a specific righteous action: In one ’s relations with other people — when one reaches beyond oneself toward another — one should be merciful. The Topical Lexicon describes biblical mercy this way:


“an active disposition of compassion that moves to relieve the misery of others.”

It goes on to describe the application:

The early church’s distribution to widows (Acts 6) sets a model for congregational mercy-ministries—food pantries, benevolence funds, medical missions.

Writings of Ignatius, Polycarp, and the Didache exhort churches to ransom captives, care for orphans, and practice hospitality.

Monastic and Medieval Hospitals: Mercy motivated the establishment of hospices and infirmaries, precursors to modern healthcare.

Mercy ministries accompanied gospel proclamation—whether in William Carey’s fight against infanticide in India or George Müller’s orphan houses in Bristol—demonstrating the indivisible bond between doctrine and deed.

All mercy requires is a position of the barest advantage over another, even for the most fleeting of moments.  With power comes responsibility, and the merciful are always thinking about how to pass on the mercy they were shown. They want to be a mirror of God to the world.

To be merciful means to be actively compassionate. God showed mercy through Jesus to us.  We imitate God when we pay this foundational mercy forward.[4]

In contrast, the miserable are the merciless, those who take every penny of power they have and try to turn it into a pound. Literally, they pound people with power. They are users of others to benefit themselves. If the merciful think of their responsibility toward others, the merciless plunder other people’s usefulness to them. Jesus told a parable about this very thing as recorded in Matthew 18:23-29.

“Therefore, the Kingdom of Heaven can be compared to a king who decided to bring his accounts up to date with servants who had borrowed money from him. In the process, one of his debtors was brought in who owed him millions of dollars. He couldn’t pay, so his master ordered that he be sold—along with his wife, his children, and everything he owned—to pay the debt.

 “But the man fell down before his master and begged him, ‘Please, be patient with me, and I will pay it all.’ Then his master was filled with pity for him, and he released him and forgave his debt. But when the man left the king, he went to a fellow servant who owed him a few thousand dollars. He grabbed him by the throat and demanded instant payment.

“His fellow servant fell down before him and begged for a little more time. ‘Be patient with me, and I will pay it,’ he pleaded. But his creditor wouldn’t wait. He had the man arrested and put in prison until the debt could be paid in full.

“When some of the other servants saw this, they were very upset. They went to the king and told him everything that had happened. Then the king called in the man he had forgiven and said, ‘You evil servant! I forgave you that tremendous debt because you pleaded with me. Shouldn’t you have mercy on your fellow servant, just as I had mercy on you”?

When we think of the merciless or the exploitive, we might think of obvious things like human trafficking or slavery, but there’s much more common ways:

·  It’s the boss who exploits her workers.

·  It’s the predatory dater who sexually uses people over and over.

·  It’s the landlord who soaks every last penny possible from his renters.

·  It’s the friend who manipulates and controls and uses you.

As you might imagine, the unmerciful are cursed. What they sow, they will reap. Meanwhile, the merciful are blessed because the mercy that they show to others will be returned to them. 

The next group blessed are the “pure in heart.” These are the uncorrupted. Their heart is unmixed, “holy”, set apart in the truest sense of the word. The Bible uses the language of metals and alloys to make this point.

“All of them are stubbornly rebellions…they are bronze (copper + tin) and iron (iron oxides); they, all of them, are corrupt.” (Jeremiah 6:28-29)

“I will…refine them as silver is refined, and test them as gold is tested. They will call on My name, and I will answer them; I will say, ‘They are My people,’ And they will say, ‘The Lord is my God.’” (Zechariah 13:9)

For [God] is like a refiner’s fire and like fullers’ soap. He will sit as a smelter and purifier of silver, and He will purify the [priests][5] and refine them like gold and silver, so that they may present to the Lord offerings in righteousness. (Malachi 3:2-4)

Notice: the pure in heart have gone through the fire. However, the pure in heart are blessed, because they now better understand God’s nature because they increasingly participate in His character.

In 2 Corinthians 3, Paul talks about how the “ministry of the Spirit…brings righteousness…we are being transformed into His image with ever increasing glory...” This is a state where not only our minds – our worldview – mirror God’s mind, but our allegiances and our hrarts do too. The reality of “Christ in us”[6] is becoming clear to all.

Miserable, then, are the devious, the corrupt in heart.  They do not think like God, they do not feel like God, and they wallow in it. Even if they do good things, it is not because they want to. It is because they have to, or because they have found a way to blend self-serving acts with what appear to be good deeds. They do not desire what God desires, and they don’t feel about the world as God feels. Not only are they negatively alloyed instead of pure, but they want to be. The corrupt in heart will not see God, because they keep undermining their ability to see well.

When Peter drew his sword in the garden. Jesus rebuked Peter, who was trying to protect Jesus. Why?

“Peter’s focus wasn’t pure, meaning it wasn’t singularly set on heaven’s agenda and heaven’s way of winning. It was divided, mixed, interested in heaven’s wisdom to some degree, but trying to make room for earth’s agenda and earth’s way of winning too.” (Jasmine Holmes)

The pure in heart see God because there is a unity of allegiance and purpose in their desires, which translates into their lifestyle. As a result, they “see God” in that they understand God more and more as they are increasingly transformed into the kind of image bearer God intended.

After the pure in heart come the peacemakers. Just as God generously used His power for us, a desire for peacemaking will reflect our desire to pass on the peace God, through Jesus, has made with, within, and among us.[7]

Peace Makers seek out hostile environments, and they make peace as far as it depends on them (Romans 12:18). We think of it often as what happens when peace comes to a war zone, or conflict ends in genocidal countries, but it can happen in your house...in this church…. at school, at work, among your friends. We make peace by…

·  leading with love

·  speaking truth with grace

·  healing brokenness with patience

·  addressing sin with humility

·  bringing justice to the oppressed

·  diffusing violence with compassion

·  pointing toward Jesus while building a bridge between those who are at odds with one another

Peacemakers share God's peace with those around them by imitating Christ's sacrificial love and participating in His work.[8] Peacemaking can be difficult work. It cost Jesus a crucifixion; it will cost us too. However, peacemakers are recognized as children of God.[9] This is not how they become children of God—that can only happen by receiving Jesus Christ as Savior (John 1:12). By making peace, believers will be recognized as children of God. They bear the family likeness.[10]

In contrast are the chaotic, those who disturb the peace. They leave a trail of discord behind them wherever they go.

·  abuse of all kinds: physical, emotional, verbal

·  manipulation and bullying

·  cutting sarcasm, constant criticism, and the incessant highlighting of what’s wrong with everything but self.

·  spreading gossip, lies and slander

·  unforgiveness

·   the use of violence to bring peace (Rome’s pax romana, the peace by the sword).

·  the love of drama and the creation of it when there is none.

Instead of seeking out situations in which to make peace, they move into situations and create the very thing for which other people are going to have to bring peace.

But, if we persevere in peacemaking, we will be called children of God because there will be a family resemblance with the Great Peacemaker who bridged the gap created by our sin, granted us peace with him, and works in us so that we can introduce peace to those around us.

Jesus next mentions “those who have been persecuted for the sake of righteousness….when people insult you and persecute you, and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me.”

In this group, we find those whose desire for righteousness is obvious in their lives. This will not make life easy, but they are willing to pay whatever it costs for the sake of the Gospel. The persecuted will be in the company of a class of people of whom the writer of Hebrews said the world is not worthy (Hebrews 11).[11] This is the bookend to the ‘poor in spirit’ who get this Kingdom of heaven; those who go through this will also inherit the Kingdom of heaven.

There are three different things that full under the umbrella of this beatitude:

·  Persecuted (dioko) – hunted; put to flight

·  Insulted (oneidzo) – mocked; disgraced

·  Falsely say (pseudomai) – lie; willfully misrepresent

Some Christians have experienced all three; some just one or two. All three provide an opportunity to respond with meekness, righteousness, mercy, and pureness of heart. Remember, you participate in eternal life with God when you experience this.

For Christians, times that the going gets tough because of our righteous reflection of God is not cause for fear or anger. It’s to be expected. The powers of the Empires don’t like anti-empire nature of true Kingdom citizens.

·  They will want us to be proud, but we are poor in spirit.

·  They will want us to be hard, but we are people who mourn.

·  They want us to flex with power, but our power is harnessed by Jesus in service of others.

·  They will want to bribe and control by satisfying our earthly appetites, but we are hungry for the things of heaven

·  They will tempt us to be harsh and cruel, but we will be the merciful ones.

·  They will want to corrupt our affections and allegiance, but we will be pure in where and how we give our love and allegiance.

·  They will want us to break the world when needed, but we will insist on mending it, and using peaceful means to bring about peaceful ends.

As a final note of encouragement, Brad Jersak has pointed out that the Beatitudes that reveal to us what God has called us to be like have been perfectly revealed in Jesus already. Jesus has shown us what is good, and what the Lord requires of us. (Micah 6:8)

Jesus, whose poverty of spirit reveals the kingdom of heaven.
Jesus, who mourns for and with those who mourn,
Jesus, the meek, whose inheritance we are,
Jesus, whose hunger and thirst are filled in doing the will of his Father,
Jesus, the merciful, the all-merciful, the especially merciful,
Jesus, the pure in heart, Lamb without guile,
Jesus, the peacemaker, minister of reconciliation, restorer of all,
Jesus, the persecuted, the slandered the crucified.

HIS is the kingdom of heaven
HE is the comfort for those he mourns
HIS is the earth and all who live in it
HE fills the hungry with good things
HE showers us all with mercy
HE alone beholds his Father and reveals his face to us as
self-giving, radically forgiving, co-suffering love
HIS is the kingdom of heaven and
HIS resurrection life is freely given!


__________________________________________________________________________

[1] I recommend two books on the beatitudes. The first is called World On Fire: Walking In The Wisdom Of Christ When Everyone’s Fighting About Everything. By Hannah Anderson, Jada Edwards, Rachel Gilson, Ashley Marivittori Gorman, Jasmine Holmes, Rebecca McLaughlin, Jen Pollock Michael, Mary Wiley, and Elizabeth Woodson. The second is What If Jesus Was Serious, by Skye Jethani.

[2] Hebrews 11:6

[3] HT C.S. Lewis

[4] Believers Bible Commentary

[5] “sons of Levi”

[6]  Colossians 1:27

[7] “Some Judeans and Galileans believed that God would help them wage war against the Romans to establish God’s kingdom, but Jesus assigned the kingdom instead to the meek, the merciful, the persecuted, and those who make peace.”  (NIV Cultural Backgrounds Study Bible)

[8]  Orthodox Study Bible

[9] “In the light of the Gospel, Jesus himself is the supreme peacemaker, making peace between God and us (Eph 2:15-17; Col 1:20) and among human beings. Our peacemaking will include the promulgation of that Gospel. It must also extend to seeking all kinds of reconciliation. Those who undertake this work are acknowledged as God's "sons". In the OT, Israel has the title "sons" (Dt 14:1; Hos 1:10). Now it belongs to the heirs of the kingdom who are especially equipped for peacemaking and so reflect something of the character of their heavenly Father.” (Expositors Bible Commentary)

[10] Believers Bible Commentary

[11] CBS Tony Evans Study Bible

The Life And Death Of This Age (Matthew 5; Luke 6)

Last time I preached, we looked at eternal life. Let’s do a quick refresher. Around the time Jesus lived, the rabbis were discussing the difference between two kinds of living.

 

·      hayei olam (Hi-YAY Oh-LAHM) was the Hebrew phrase for eternal or everlasting life. It referred to living in a way that focused on matters of eternal importance. It was about a quality of life.[1]

·      hayei sha’ah (Hi-YAY Sha-AH) was the Hebrew phrase for fleeting or earthly life. It was only concerned with short-term material needs of today: working, making money, eating, etc.

 

The New Testament language is going to use more stark language of eternal/everlasting life vs. eternal/everlasting death.  Aiōnios, the word often translated as “eternal” or “everlasting”, means “of the Age” or “pertaining to the age.” Like “hayei,” it focuses more on quality rather than quantity.[2]

There were other Greek words that focused unambiguously on the time factor: aidios, aperantos(unlimited), adialeiptos (unceasing), or ateleutos (endless). The writers of the Bible were inspired by God to choose aiónios instead, so there must be something important here.

Think of the Bible as talking about the Now “the life/death of this age” or the Not Yet  “life/death of that age to come.”[3] It’s going to tell us something about how we are participating in the life Jesus offers starting right now – or how we are participating in the ways of death, starting right now.

I suspect the best overview of this is in the Sermon on the Mount, with a focus on the Beatitudes. Jesus explains how to enter into aonios life, the life of the age right now, as a foretaste of the life in the age to come. The contrast is going to show us what participating in the death of this age looks like, which is also a foretaste of the death in the age to come. From Matthew 5:


Then Jesus came down with them and stood on a level place. When he saw the crowds, Jesus went back up the mountain. After he sat down his disciples came to him. Then looking up at his disciples, he began to teach them by saying:

·  Blessed are the poor in spirit, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to them.

·  Blessed are those who mourn or weep, for they will be comforted and laugh.

·  Blessed are the meek, for they will inherit the earth.

·  Blessed are those who hunger and thirst now for righteousness, for they will be satisfied.

·  Blessed are the merciful, for they will be shown mercy.

·  Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God.

·  Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called the children of God

·  Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to them.

·  Blessed are you when people hate you, and when they exclude you and insult you and reject you as evil and persecute you and say all kinds of evil things about you falsely on account of me. Rejoice in that day and jump for joy, because your reward is great in heaven. For their ancestors persecuted the prophets before you in the same way.

The Greek word for blessed, makarios, was used by the Greeks for the kind of happiness and well-being the gods themselves enjoy. When Jesus talked about the makarios, the blessed ones, he meant those who participate in life with God, as God intended.

The “blessed” follow an interesting pattern. Starting with the poor in spirit, they seem to lay out a progression of how to move into deeper spiritual, relational, and emotional aonios life of this age. We are only going to cover the first three this morning, but I think you will see that progression emerge.

You might also notice that the qualities described and approved are the opposite of those that empires typically value. So as we go through the Beatitudes, we are also going to look at what characterizes participating in the death of the age.

We begin with the “poor in spirit.” These are the ones who understand their spiritual situation: they are broken. They are struggling with the chains of sin; they are in a spiritual battle against principalities and powers, and they have at times fought with the enemy instead of against him. But in spite of this, they are living in a blessed state, because recognizing the problem is the first step in inheriting the Kingdom of Heaven.

The first beatitude gives the correct diagnosis: we need a doctor, not just to save us from death, but to continue to heal us. We have to see this to find life. We see in Luke’s gospel.

He also told this parable to some who trusted in themselves that they were righteous, and treated others with contempt: “Two men went up into the temple to pray, one a Pharisee and the other a tax collector. The Pharisee, standing by himself, prayed thus: ‘God, I thank you that I am not like other men, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even like this tax collector. I fast twice a week; I give tithes of all that I get.’

But the tax collector, standing far off, would not even lift up his eyes to heaven, but beat his breast, saying, ‘God, be merciful to me, a sinner!’ I tell you, this man went down to his house justified, rather than the other. For everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, but the one who humbles himself will be exalted.” (Luke 18:9-14)

I think this first beatitude is meant to be one on which the others are built. If the original sin was pride; the original virtue – humility - is the opposite of it. And, I might add, a powerful way to engage in spiritual warfare.

Kingdom people recognize their own inadequacy and insufficiency apart from God. To quote from the first step in a lot of recovery groups, “We admit that we are powerless, and our lives have become unmanageable.”

This kind of humility or ‘poorness of spirit’ is not self-loathing. It’s not incessantly focusing on our weakness, or thinking of ourselves as less than we ought. We are, after all, image bearers of God. If we are a follower of Jesus, we are an ambassador, a son or daughter of God, a temple – so much language in the Bible explaining our worth.

Humility involves not thinking more highly of ourselves than we should. It’s being realistic about the broken and sinful parts of who we are. It’s knowing the limit of our abilities; it’s seeing where we are weak and acknowledging it. The poor in spirit are very much just…honest about themselves.

The opposite is pride. The proud live in a cursed state; they think they are grand, that they are all put together. They would say, if they were in a group, “I admit that I am powerful, and my life will be what I make it.”[4] They thrive on insulting and humiliating others. Everything circles back to them. In their minds, they are the smartest, the most capable, the expert on everything. For you gamers, everyone else is a boring Non-Playable Characters (NPCs).

They don’t see how they are damaged and enslaved by sin, how badly they are in need of righteousness, how painfully they land in the world, or how their unaddressed participation in the death of this age is hurting those around them.

If there is one sin which God hates more than another, and more sets Himself against, it is the sin of pride. Like a weed upon a dung-heap, pride grows more profusely in some soils, especially when well fertilized by rank, riches, praise, flattery, our own ignorance, and the ignorance of others…

Those, perhaps, who think they possess the least pride, and view themselves with wonderful self-admiration as the humblest of mortals, may have more pride than those who feel and confess it. (J.C. Philpot)

One of the hardest things to deal with is people who say, “I’ve got this!” when you know they don’t got that. The hardest kids to coach are not the ones who know they are terrible; it is those who can barely dribble who think they have a shot at the NBA. The hardest person to counsel…the hardest musician to train…the hardest spouse or parent to live with… they all follow this pattern. They have so much awesomeness to defend.

Here’s how C.S. Lewis describes God’s plan for the poor in spirit:

[God] wants you to know Him: wants to give you Himself. And He and you are two things of such a kind that if you really get into any kind of touch with Him you will, in fact, be humble—delightedly humble, feeling the infinite relief of having for once got rid of all the silly nonsense about your own dignity which has made you restless and unhappy all your life.

He is trying to make you humble in order to make this moment possible: trying to take off a lot of silly, ugly, fancy-dress in which we have all got ourselves up and are strutting about like the little idiots we are.

 I wish I had got a bit further with humility myself: if I had, I could probably tell you more about the relief, the comfort, of taking the fancy-dress off—getting rid of the false self, with all its 'Look at me' and 'Aren't I a good boy?' and all its posing and posturing. To get even near it, even for a moment, is like a drink of cold water to a man in a desert.

Only by stopping my attempts to rule in the Kingdom of Me, where I must increase while God and others decrease, can I participate in the life of this age. Only by being humbly and desperately dependent on the saving and transforming grace of God can we become what God has created us to be.[5]

Next come the mourners. The context indicates that they are mourning over sin and evil; they especially mourn their own, but they also mourn the failure of mankind to live righteously.[6] They have moved beyond being aware of the problem to bemoaning the broken state of the world. The godly remnant of Jesus' day wept because of the humiliation of Israel as a result of their sin, both personal and corporate. Weeping for sins, to the Israelites, was a deeply poignant[7] act that covered societal sin and those who participated in it.

Mourners are not only thinking about the situation the way God thinks about it; they are feeling about the world the way God feels about it. They call good; good; evil, they call evil. (Isaiah 5:20) God grieves over the sin and brokeness of the world (Ephesians 4:30; Mark 3:5), and they do too.

This mourning is not sadness that leads to despair (see 2 Corinthians 7:10). God has promised comfort to his people (Isaiah 40:1; 51:3; 61:2 – 3; 66:13).  Holy sorrow is part of repentance, conversion, and virtuous action.[8] We are blessed as this drives us to the comfort of salvation. When know we are sick, and we want the cure, and we find the right doctor, we will be okay.  The life of the age commences.

In contrast, “Cursed are the hardened.” They know there is a problem – maybe - but they refuse to address it. They convince themselves that they will be okay, or that it’s not their problem. They have nothing to repent of, for sure. They define good in the world is that which benefits them; the evil, that which gets in their way. They detach the proper emotion from this reality, and off they go with a smile – or a scowl - fixed on their face.

They distract themselves or drown their emotions in a flood of parties, distractions, pleasures, and work. It’s a lifestyle of denial. They refuse to pursue empathy on behalf of the poor, the downtrodden, the weak, the marginalized. They don’t care about life in someone else’s shoes.[9] Even if they see the diagnosis, they don’t hate the sickness enough to care about the cure. #fruitofpride

Because - let’s be honest - the cure is hard. It requires mourning. If you know anything about Old Testament precedent, it was sackcloth and ashes, and fasting. Who looks forward to mourning brokenness and failure? And mourning might mean you care enough to get involved in a way that costs you something.

But….not mourning is hard too. The hardening of our lives has its own consequence. The things we use to drown our emotions will eventually drown us. The walls we build to wall off parts of ourselves we want to avoid will eventually be walls that separate us from others, because - let’s be honest - people who refuse to address their own issues are hard to be around.

Two paths, both of which are hard. Choose the one that leads to life. The beatitudes teach that we begin by embracing transformative sorrow to participate in the life of this age.

Counterintuitive, I know. But it’s the way to life, because God is at work in the midst of that process. In fact, the word used for “they shall be comforted” is parakaleo, from which we get parakletos, the Holy Spirit, our comforter who is also an advocate[10] for those whose mourning has led them to repentance and into salvation.

These first two beatitudes deliberately allude to the messianic blessing of Isaiah 61:1-3, the one Jesus read in his hometown to announce who he was. Here it is again – at least the portion Jesus read:

The Lord has appointed me for a special purpose. He has anointed me to bring good news to the poor. He has sent me to repair broken hearts, and to declare to those who are held captive and bound in prison, “Be free from your imprisonment!” 2 He has sent me to announce the year of jubilee, the season of the Eternal’s favor.

That’s where mourning is headed: gladness, victory, joy, and comfort. But it starts with mourning.

Then there are the gentle, or meek/humble.  The same word is used in the Greek in a variety of ways:

·  bulls that pull a plow

·  horses that pull a chariot

The meek are the ones who are willing to have their power harnessed into the service of the Kingdom. Our pattern for meekness or gentleness[11] is Jesus, who submits to the will of His Father.

Though Jesus set the pattern, we need this harnessing in ways Jesus did not in order for us to flourish in the life of this age. Unharnessed, we are wild and untamed.

The humble (the poor in spirit who mourn the effect of sin) know they need to be controlled, because on their own they will just tear things up. They know that they need a yoke; they know that if their life is harnessed in the right cause, they can be strong in the service of something greater than themselves. They began to gain a sense of what their life might mean to others.

In meekness, we see the beginning of a sense of community.

Because the meek are God-controlled, the Holy Spirit brings about the strength to have mastery over passions and emotions. Meekness is not passive weakness, but strength directed and under control to bring about good.

The problem with winter hurricanes and cyclones isn’t that there is wind; it’s that the wind is untamed and destructive. It leaves devastation in its wake. None of us look at that and think, “Well, wind is a terrible idea.” No, we look at it and say, “That much wind is a problem.”

·  If you physically bully people, the problem isn’t that you are too strong; it’s that you use your strength to break the world instead of fix it.

·  If you verbally abuse people, the problem isn’t that you can speak; it’s that you use the power of your words to bring death instead of life.

·  If your emotions lash out in a way that manipulates or wounds people, the problem isn’t that you have emotions; it’s that your emotions are unharnessed and destructive.

So it is with the things constrained by meekness. Holy Spirit-empowered meekness orders our lives for our good and the good of others. The life of this age flourishes when we surrender to God’s constraint to fulfill His design in ourselves and in the world around us. Participating in eternal life means participating in the lives of those around us in ways that reveal that goodness of the Kingdom of God.

In contrast, it is participation in the death of the age to remain wild, living an unharnessed or destructive life. The wild don’t want authority over them; they want to do their own thing, follow their own heart, use their strength for themselves and not bring their lives into submission or service to others. They are all about the self. “I can do what I want. Nobody tells me what to do.” They are bullies who love to force themselves onto the world. #stillafruitofpride

When I taught my ethics class at NMC, a key question that kept coming up was this: “What would it look like if everybody lived like you?” or “Would you like other people if they lived by your standards?” It’s a way of talking about the Golden Rule: “Do to others what you would like for them to do to you.” This does not happen when we are not meek.

This is the opposite of the meek, who have a sense of their place and responsibility in community. They see how their lives are situated in the midst of the lives of others. The meek seek to live out the Golden Rule: they want those around them to live with constrained power that brings about the flourishing of everyone, so they do it too.

The law of meekness is: If thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, not only give him drink (which is an act of charity), but drink to him, in token of friendship, and true love, and reconciliation; and in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire upon his head, not to consume him, but to melt and soften him, that he may be cast into a new mold. (Matthew Henry)

One day the owner of the earth will pass an inheritance on to the meek. The ones who know what it’s like to be stewarded know how to steward well in turn, both in this age and the age to come. [12] 

The first three beatitudes lay a foundation:

·  honest brokenness over our sin

·  humble mourning that leads to repentance and salvation

·  harnessed servanthood that leads to flourishing.

We see here three requirements for entering into eternal life with God and building the kind of Kingdom God has planned.

FOR PART TWO, CLICK HERE
__________________________________________________________________________

[1] Consider, for instance, the “everlasting (olam) hills” in Canaan (Genesis 49:26), Aaron’s “everlasting” high priesthood (Exodus 40:15), Phinehas’ “everlasting” priesthood (Numbers 25:11–13), “everlasting” atonement rituals for the Israelites (Leviticus 16:34), etc. These “everlasting” ordinances were only for a time.

[2] In Matthew 25:46, Jesus speaks of “eternal punishment” (kolasin aiōnion) and “eternal life” (zōēn aiōnion). The Greek word aiōnios  derives from aiōn, meaning an age or era.

Classical and biblical usage shows that aiōnios often means “pertaining to an age” or “age-enduring.” The New Testament itself speaks of “long ages” (aiōniois chronois, Rom. 16:25) that have come to an end. It often is used in ways in Scripture that clearly do not mean “unending,” such as the phrases zoē aiónios – “life of the Age” (commonly translated "eternal life") or kolasis aiónios – “punishment of the Age.

[3] “In the New Testament the history of the world is conceived as developed through a succession of aeons. A series of such aeons precedes the introduction of a new series inaugurated by the Christian dispensation, and the end of the world and the second coming of Christ are to mark the beginning of another series. . . . He includes the series of aeons in one great aeon, ὁ αἰὼν τῶν αἰώνων, the aeon of the aeons (Eph. 3:21); and the author of the Epistle to the Hebrews describes the throne of God as enduring unto the aeon of the aeons (Heb 1:8). The plural is also used, aeons of the aeons, signifying all the successive periods which make up the sum total of the ages collectively. . . . This plural phrase is applied by Paul to God only.” (Vincent’s Word Studies)

 

[4] Psalm 10:4 “In his pride the wicked man does not seek him; in all his thoughts there is no room for God.”

 

[5] The kingdom of heaven, where self-sufficiency is no virtue and self-exaltation is a vice, belongs to such people. (Believers Bible Commentary)

[6] They mourn over both personal and corporate sins (see Ezra 9:1–4 as an example from the Old Testament).

[7] Ezra 10:6; Psalm 51:4; Daniel 9:19-20)

[8] Orthodox Study Bible

[9] There is a weird flex right now in evangelical circles in which empathy is considered a sin. That feels like the fruit of pride to me.

[10] It’s not like God doesn’t know about our repentance and salvation. It’s an earthly analogy (the biblical audience knew what a parakletos was and did in society) to illustrate a spiritual reality.

[11] The same Greek word is translated “gentle” elsewhere.

[12] “The ultimate fulfillment of the promise to Abraham and his offspring that they would be ‘heirs of the world’” (Romans 4:13). (ESV Global Study Bible)

Now and Not Yet

Some books have a prologue; this sermon does too.

The rabbis and the writers of the New Testament understood the term “the Kingdom of Heaven” to have a dual meaning: 

  • The rule of God in the present

  • the reign of God in the age to come.[1]

Christians have long called this “the now[2] and not yet.” In Northern Michigan we know what this is like when it comes to seasons. When the first day of spring shows up on the calendar, the age of fulfillment has come, but the consummation is still in the future. Here is a biblical example.

“Dear friends, now we are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know that when Christ appears, we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is.” (1 John 3:2)

Here are a few other examples where you are going to have to look up the address yourself :)

  • We are already adopted in Christ (Romans 8:15), but not yet fully adopted (Romans 8:23)

  • We are already redeemed in Christ (Ephesians 1:7), but not yet fully redeemed (Ephesians 4:30)

  • We are already sanctified in Christ (1 Corinthians 1:2), but not yet fully sanctified (1 Thessalonians 5:23–24)

  • We are already saved in Christ (Ephesians 2:8), but not yet fully saved (Romans 5:9).

  • We are already raised with Christ (Ephesians 2:6), but not yet fully raised (1 Corinthians 15:52).[3]

The now and not yet. 

* * * * *

Last week we talked about what all the sermons in the book of Acts present. Today, we will talk about some really significant things that are not present in the speeches in the book of Acts.

Specifically, heaven and hell are not presented as motivators for following Jesus in the book of Acts. They are barely mentioned at all.

Hades is mentioned once in Acts 2, where Peter is quoting Psalm 16. There, Peter is just applying a prophecy to Jesus (“You will not abandon my soul to Hades/Sheol”). He’s not making a presentation about it.[4]

In the New Testament, heaven (Ouranos) can refer to the sky, outer space, or the third heaven (God’s dwelling place). Acts uses “heaven” language as shorthand for “where God reigns” twice: God “raised Jesus” and exalted him (Acts 2:33–36), and Jesus is enthroned at God’s right hand (Acts 7:55–56).[5]

Even the phrase “eternal/everlasting life” appears only in one speech (Acts 13:46-48), but the phrase “eternal/everlasting punishment” not at all.[6]

Clearly, what happens in the age to come is a very important part of the Christian worldview and is talked about by Jesus and others as recorded in Scripture. But in the midst of all the sermons and speeches in Acts, the life in the age to come – the “not yet” -  is not front and center, and punishment and reward in the age to come are not presented as motivators for following Jesus.

Acts focuses on the “now” part of the “now and not yet.”

Having said that, Acts absolutely does preach the importance of repentance with a coming judgment in view.

  • Paul teaches that God “commands all people everywhere to repent” because God “has fixed a day” to judge the world through the risen Jesus (Acts 17:30–31). 

  • Peter told Cornelius, “[Christ] commanded us to preach to the people and to testify that he is the one appointed by God to be judge of the living and the dead.” (Acts 10:42-43)

Clearly there will be a judgment that holds us accountable. Acts does not deny this at all. It just doesn’t record a detailed map of competing destinations in the afterlife, and it doesn’t incorporate a presentation of them into evangelism tools to reach their audience.

Why? I suspect that their audience had a grasp of reward and punishment that they took so seriously already that Paul and Peter didn’t need to raise the stakes for them as they considered whether or not to repent and follow Jesus. That is what we are going to examine.

When people in Peter and Paul’s audience were called to repent, they were generally trying to avoid “the wrath of God”.  HELPS Word-studies defines this wrath this way:

“Settled anger (opposition) proceeds from an internal disposition which steadfastly opposes someone or something based on extended personal exposure…a fixed, controlled, passionate feeling against sin . . . a settled indignation.”

So, God’s wrath isn’t God flying off the handle in a temper outburst. God is, after all, “slow to anger” (Psalm 86:15, etc).  God steadfastly opposes sin because He knows what it does (that’s the “extended personal exposure”). He has a settled indignation at the chaos it causes. He has a holy resistance to corruption. He loves His creation too much to let it be ruined without consequence.

In the framework of God’s Old Testament covenant with Israel, the wrath of God was more often than not very practical. Think of the OT blessings vs. curses within the covenant that mapped onto righteousness vs. sin. Wrath is God’s in that God warns us that sin will lead to consequences that God himself has ordained.

This was something the people of Israel had experienced already in this life, and the Jewish people continued to understand as seen in the writings of Paul.

Ezekiel 22:31 - “I will pour out my wrath…they have returned their conduct upon their heads, says the Lord God.”

Romans 1 -  “The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people….  God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts… God gave them over to a depraved mind.” 

Galatians 6:7 - “Be not deceived; God is not mocked. What one sows, one will also reap.”

So what does the wrath of consequences look like? Two key results show up over and over again in the Old Testament; that pattern starts immediately in Genesis.

  • loss of life (“if you eat you will surely die”)[7]

  • loss of the land intended to give them life (exile from Eden).[8] To be exiled from the land is to be pushed back toward chaos and death. Wrath was the loss of life-giving space.

That pattern continues through so many stories. The wrath of God revealed as the wages of sin leads to death or loss of the land meant to give them life.

  • The people go to Egypt for help during a famine instead of trusting God, and they lose their land (and a lot of lives).

  • When they follow God out of Egypt, God leads them toward a land of Promise – and an entire generation dies outside the land because of sin.

  • They make it to the land; when their sin overwhelms them, they are conquered and exiled.[9]

This is exactly the framework that the apostles in Acts assume when they warn about the consequences of “wrath” without needing to tap into imagery of life or death in the age to come. Their audience already knows the story: the wages of sin are death and exile from the blessing of the land God had provided for them.

I suspect this is why the afterlife isn’t central in Acts. There was plenty of material here already. When Jesus warned them about the punishment of Gehennah (literally right outside the city gates), they wanted to avoid it at all cost. They had seen what happened there to their ancestors.[10] They knew what that meant. The wages of sin were death and exile.

When John the Baptist said, “Flee from the wrath to come,” his audience had centuries of history that formed the legitimacy of this warning. So many times, God’s people had fallen into sin, failed to hear the prophets, and experienced the wrath of God through the consequences of their sin. It’s been an ongoing reality. That’s why Paul can write,

“The wrath of God is being revealed (present tense) from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness…” (Romans 1:18)

But that wasn’t the end of the story. The prophets had always insisted that the goal was always repentance, return, and restoration into a renewal of life. Here is just one (fairly famous) example.

This is what the Lord says: “When seventy years are completed for Babylon, I will come to you and fulfill my good promise to bring you back to this place. For I know the plans I have for you,” declares the Lord, “plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future. Then you will call on me and come and pray to me, and I will listen to you. 

You will seek me and find me when you seek me with all your heart. I will be found by you,” declares the Lord, “and will bring you back from captivity I will gather you from all the nations and places where I have banished you,” declares the Lord, “and will bring you back to the place from which I carried you into exile.” Jeremiah 29:10-14)[11]

The Jewish people still thought of themselves as exiled even though they were back in their own land. Rome ruled them; they were convinced God’s Spirit had left them; the glory hadn’t returned to the Temple; and so many of the prophets promises had not been fulfilled.

And if they were still in exile, they were still under the wrath of God.

The apostles are convincing their audience that Jesus has conquered the power of death and exile. That’s why the focus is on Jesus’ resurrection/exaltation (He’s God!), the outpouring of the Holy Spirit (“The Kingdom is within you!”), and a new community of belonging (“You’re home!”).

In a sense, Jesus relives Israel’s history of death and exile by participating in it.

  • Goes into Egypt (Matthew 2)

  • Enters the wilderness (40 days)

  • Crucified outside the city (Hebrews 13:12)

  • Hung on a tree (Deuteronomy 21’s curse)

  • Enters death (Hades)

On the cross, Jesus stepped into exile and overpowered it. He entered the realm of death and took away its power. Acts preaches that, because of what Jesus has done, the exile is over. The King has returned and sits on a throne in His Kingdom, which has now expanded to include all the nations. He is pouring out His life-giving Holy Spirit for renewal and refreshing. And he has even rebuilt the Temple, but this time it’s His people.

The age of exile is over because the risen King has come. A national and even cosmic restoration has begun.

Acts’ dominant evangelistic posture is a proactive summons into this new life of restoration and reconciliation. Repentance is a doorway into resurrection life and Spirit-formed community. The stress is on what it looks like to experience the Kingdom of God now.

  • Forgiveness of sins

  • Gift of the Holy Spirit

  • Inclusion in a new community

  • Participation in God’s renewing work

Acts invites its audience to align themselves with Jesus, because resurrection has already begun. They are no longer exiled from the true land that nourishes them with the true Water and Bread of life. The land – the Kingdom of God - is theirs to enjoy, beginning now. Paul told Timothy, 

“Take hold of the eternal life to which you were called.” (1 Timothy 6:12)

Every commentary I read said something like this: Believers have begun "eternal (aiṓnios) life" right now, experiencing this quality of God's life now as a present possession.[12]

Around the time Jesus lived, the rabbis were discussing the difference between hayei olam (Hi-YAY Oh-LAHM), meaning eternal life, which is contrasted with hayei sha’ah (Hi-YAY Sha-AH), which means fleeting or earthly life.

This wasn’t about before death and after death. Hayei olam was “lasting life,” and it referred to living in a way that focused on matters of eternal importance. Hayei sha’ah was about only being concerned with short-term material needs of today: working, making money, eating, etc.

We as followers of Jesus have hayei olam, and it begins now.  There’s more to come, but it begins now. Let’s go with John 4:14’s image:

“The water I give them will become in them a spring of water welling up to eternal life.”

If you go to where the Boardman River pops out of the ground, and put your kayak in, you are on the Boardman river. But the spring is just the beginning. That river will take you somewhere. You are on the river “now” but you are “not yet” where it plans to take you. So, how do we start eternal life now?

“Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent.” (John 17:3)

Knowing has to do with being transformed into the image of Christ, having the Holy Spirit at work in us, absorbing the truth of God’s word, ordering our life around the things of God, seeking to see God at work in every situation… It’s an active, all-encompassing, total life surrender and make over. 

Eternal life starts with repentance, turning away from all that is sinful and unrighteous and turning toward the path of life made possible through Jesus.  It’s living in God's righteous path centered in God's will, making it our highest priority to further God’s interests and kingdom in every way by having eyes that see what Jesus sees, hearts that respond like the heart of Jesus, and hands that do what Jesus would do.

And if we do this as entire communities of people, the “now” gives us clearer and clearer images of the glory and goodness that awaits us in the “not yet.”


_________________________________________________________________________________

[1] “The Kingdom Of Heaven In The Here And Now And Future.” Marg Mowczko, https://margmowczko.com/the-kingdom-of-heaven-here-now-future/

[2] “The coming of the kingdom of God is not something that can be observed, nor will people say, ‘Here it is,’ or ‘There it is,’ because the kingdom of God is in your midst (or, within you).” (Luke 17:20b-21)

[3] https://www.desiringgod.org/articles/already-not-yet provided that list.

[4] The word “hell” did not exist when the Bible was written. Hell comes from a word with German roots, haljō, referring to a "concealed place" or the place of the dead. Norse mythology made it famous: “Hel” refers to both the realm of the dead and the goddess who rules it (no surprise – her dad is Loki.) “Hell” starts showing up in Bible translations around 1,000 AD. It eventually became a catch-all word that referred to Sheol (Old Testament realm of the dead in Hebrew); Hades (New Testament realm of the dead in Greek), ,Gehenna (the valley of Hinnom), and Tartarus. The individual words matter, because they meant different things to the audience in the book of Acts.

[5] Heaven is God’s headquarters. The emphasis in Acts is on exaltation and lordship, not relocation after this life

[6] You see “everlasting/eternal life/punishment” discussed more in the letters to the churches.

[7] Genesis 2. Also, “The soul that sins shall die” (Ezekiel)

[8] Genesis 3

[9] The Northern Kingdom was destroyed by Assyria and the people deported because of idolatry and injustice. (2 Kings 17) Jeremiah and Ezekiel record the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple, and the people removed from the land.

[10] And, sadly, would happen again in A.D. 70.

[11] The author of Romans will note: ““We were enemies… we were reconciled… saved from wrath.” (Rom 5:9–10)

[12]  All the discussion that follows on eternal life as understood in the time of Jesus is from Lois Tverberg, writing in “Eternal Life, Here and Now.”

The Connection Between Theology and Relationships (Act 10 Continued…)

I noted last week that a change in theology will lead to a change in relationships. What I meant is that what we think is true about God has implications for how we live.

Saul is a classic example. He thought of God as not Jesus, and thus those who worshipped Jesus as God were blasphemous idolaters. When God made clear that Jesus was God’s revelation of himself—Jesus, who said, “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do” of those who denied, betrayed, and killed him—well, this had implications for how Paul would live.

We keep seeing this correction in Scripture. Remember how Peter had the vision to stop viewing Gentiles as unclean? In Galatians 2, Paul writes that Peter eventually stopped eating with Gentiles because of pressure from Jewish people to stop hanging out with uncircumcised people. Even Barnabas joined in. So, Paul corrected their behavior by correcting their view of God.

“We who are Jews by birth and not sinful Gentiles know that a person is not justified by the works of the law, but by faith in Jesus Christ. So we, too, have put our faith in Christ Jesus that we may be justified by faith in Christ and not by the works of the law, because by the works of the law no one will be justified.” (Galatians 2:15-16)

So in Christ Jesus you are all children of God through faith, for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. (Galatians 3:26-28)

For the entire law is fulfilled in keeping this one command: “Love your neighbor as yourself.”  If you bite and devour each other, watch out or you will be destroyed by each other. (Galatians 5: 14-15)

Wrong theology produces unrighteous segregation. Right theology produces shared tables. Let’s try another cause/effect in Romans.

“While we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son.” (Romans 5:10)

“Bless those who persecute you… do not repay evil for evil.” (Romans 12)

Paul grounds the love of enemies explicitly in God’s character revealed at the cross. If God reconciles enemies, his people cannot justify vengeance. A distorted image of God always produces distorted relationships. A healed vision of God will heal how we treat people.

If we move beyond the book of Acts and look at church history, there are a ton of examples. Let’s look at just two that were momentous in church formation. One will be bad; one will be good. They will highlight that we can tell what people think about God by looking at who they are willing to harm, and who they are determined to love.

Constantine

Under Constantine, Christians moved from a persecuted minority to being partners with the state. Their leaders began to argue that Rome’s agenda was the church’s agenda, which suggested that Rome’s way of bringing about its mission was sanctioned by God. (Constantine claimed a vision in which he saw a cross and the words, “In this sign, conquer.”) Followers of Jesus who had formerly refused to help Rome’s violent pax romana (peace by the sword) as it conquered the world and subjugated people, well, they now joined in.

Basically, Jesus moved from Lord over/against empire to Lord underwriting empire. The cross increasingly becomes reinterpreted as a sign of geo-political victory rather than an expression of self-giving love. Peace became defined as coercive stability (pax Romana) rather than the reconciled shalom of the Bible.

Meanwhile, church bishops gained political power. Because the church and state were so closely intertwined, church dissent became dangerous. Heresy moved from errors to be corrected to crimes to be punished.

  • Irenaeus (2nd Century) was the first person on record to define heresy. He simply warned about the dangers of a multitude of opinions on how God works.

  • The first person to make heresy a crime was Emperor Constantine (320s).

  • ·The first recorded execution of a Christian heretic, Priscillian of Ávila, occurred in 385 by Roman secular authorities.

Once Jesus was imagined primarily as Cosmic Emperor with Constantine as an earthly representation, violence became thinkable “for the good.” Relationships change when theology changes.

The Reformation

The push to remember that justification is by faith, not works, was long overdue. The Reformers stressed the priesthood of all believers (1 Peter 2:9); we did not need mediators to have a relationship with God. We have Jesus. (1 Timothy 2:5) Because God was the kind of God who directly related to all believers, a couple changes followed.

  • Scripture was translated into the common language. It didn’t need to be filtered by those who could read Latin.

  • Vocational holiness was stressed (work, family, farming). There was dignity in all walks of life, not just ecclesiastical hierarchies.

  • Personal, pastoral care began to be emphasized over penitential systems. A personal, relational God wanted personal, relational people.

Whenever the church changes what it believes about God, it changes how it treats people.

In Acts, there are seven major speeches in chapters 2, 3, 7, 10, 13, 17, and 20. We now have four of them under our belt, so I think it’s time to look at what these speeches have in common. If you were to make a Venn Diagram with 7 bubbles, they would all overlap at some point, some more than others.

But there are actually more ‘sermons’ than that (Acts 2 14-40; 3:12-26; 4:5-12; 7; 10:28-47; 13:16-41;17:22-35; 20:17-35; 24:10-21). I couldn’t get them all on a Venn diagram, so let’s try a chart that will show how much they keep revisiting the same themes. (Keep in mind some audiences were Jewish and some Gentile, so things like Salvation History were only of interest to the Jews.)

We did a Harmony of the Gospels that combined the gospels (as best we could) into one harmonious flow. I am going to try to do that with the speeches this morning. Let’s read it, then we will discuss.

“Men and women, brothers and sisters, children of Abraham and Gentiles who fear God, hear these words.” [Acts 2:14; 13:16; 17:22]

“The God who made heaven and earth, the sea and everything in them, the God of our fathers and the giver of life to all peoples, has never been distant from what he has made.” [Acts 3:13; 17:24]

“From the beginning, he has been patient, faithful, and merciful, working through times and seasons so that people might seek him and find him, for he is not far from any one of us.” [Acts 17:26–27]

“From among the nations he called Abraham, and through Abraham he formed a people - not because they were great, but because he is good.” [Acts 7:2–8; 13:17]

“He bore with them in their rebellion, delivered them from slavery, walked with them through the wilderness, led them to the promised land, and spoke to them through the prophets. Again and again, God sent his servants, and again and again they were misunderstood, resisted, and rejected.” [Acts 7:9–52; 13:18–27]

“Yet God did not abandon his purpose, nor did human unfaithfulness cancel divine mercy. In the fullness of time, God sent Jesus of Nazareth, a man accredited by God to you by miracles, wonders and signs, which God did among you through him.” [Acts 2:22; 3:20; Acts 7:35–38;10:38;13:30]

“He went about doing good, healing the sick, restoring the broken, announcing good news to the poor and freedom from the power of the devil. God was with him.” [Acts 10:38; 2:22]

“Yet this Jesus was handed over. He was rejected by leaders, condemned unjustly, and put to death by human hands. But God raised him from the dead. Death could not hold him. The grave could not keep him.” [Acts 2:23-32; 3:13–15; 4:10; 10:40; 13:27–37; 17:31]

“By raising Jesus, God has done three things: First, he has vindicated the one we rejected and declared him to be Lord and Messiah. Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to mankind by which we must be saved.” [Acts 2:36; 4:10–12; 10:36]

“Second, he has confirmed all that the prophets spoke: suffering would not be the final word, that corruption would not triumph, and that God’s Holy One would see life again.” [Acts 3:18; 13:32–33; 26:22–23]

“And third, he has opened a new and living way not only for Israel,
but for all nations.” [Acts 10:34–35; 13:46–47; 15:7–11]

“This risen Jesus has been exalted to the right hand of God, and from there he has poured out the Holy Spirit, not on the deserving, the powerful, or on people only, but on all whom God calls. We have seen it with our own eyes. God shows no favoritism.” [Acts 2:32-33; 10:39–47; 15:8–9]

“He now commands all people everywhere to repent, then, and turn to God. Everyone who believes in him is justified. Turn from what is empty, what enslaves, and turn to the living God.

This repentance leads to forgiveness of sins, to freedom from what the law could never fully remove. from the power of Satan, and to times of refreshing from the Lord.”
[Acts 2:38; 3:19, 38-39; 10:43; 13:39; 14:15; 15:1117:30; 26:18]

“This same Jesus has been appointed by God as the one through whom the world will be set right. God has given proof of this to all by raising him from the dead.” [Acts 17:31; 24:15, 25]

“This message is for you and for those far away, for all whom the Lord our God will call. We do not preach ourselves or a new god; we proclaim what God has done through Jesus. So receive this grace, stand in this mercy, and walk in this new life.” [Acts 2:39-47; Acts 20:24-35; 26:22]

 Demonstrate your repentance by your deeds. And we must help the weak, remembering the words the Lord Jesus himself said: ‘It is more blessed to give than to receive.’ ” (Acts 20:35; 26:20)

Acts gives an epic presentation of corrective truth about who God is, what God has done, and what God expects of His people. I suspect that every audience in Acts basically go their own Damascus Road experience. Notice the close – which has text from the last two sermons.

Demonstrate your repentance by your deeds. And we must help the weak, remembering the words the Lord Jesus himself said: ‘It is more blessed to give than to receive.’ ” (Acts 20:35; 26:20)

My claim at the beginning of this message is that a change of theology will bring about a change in relationships. The last two speeches make this clear. So, what kind of community emerges on the other side?

The Teaching The Change

God shows no favoritism Table fellowship across boundaries (Acts 10–11)

Jesus is Lord                           Allegiance above empire (Acts 17; 24)

Grace precedes law Gentiles included without Torah knowledge (Acts 15)

Spirit is poured out on all Shared life & generosity (Acts 2; 4)

Leaders serve Lives of humility, self-giving (Acts 20)

In Acts, acting righteously or justly is not an add-on to the gospel. It is the inevitable consequence of believing certain things about God. When the church confesses that God shows no partiality, welcomes outsiders, pours out His Spirit on all flesh, and saves by grace, our practices must match or our theology is exposed as incomplete.

I also made the claim that whenever the church changes what it believes about God, it changes who it is willing to harm—or to love. On the other side of the life of Jesus and the teaching in the book of Acts, who were early Christians willing to harm? No one. Who were they willing to love? Everybody. The Bible makes this clear, but I would like to show you the record from the church as it built on the foundation it had been given.

“This is the way of life: first, thou shalt love the God who made thee, secondly, thy neighbor as thyself: and all things whatsoever thou wouldest not should happen to thee, do not thou to another. The teaching of these words is this: Bless those who curse you, and pray for your enemies, and fast on behalf of those who persecute you. What thanks will be due to you, if ye love only those who love you? Do not the Gentiles also do the same? But love ye those who hate you, and ye shall not have an enemy.” (The Didache, also known as The Teachings of the 12 Apostles, a Christian document written between 80AD – 90AD.)

“We who formerly treasured money and possessions more than anything else now hand over everything we have to a treasury for all and share it with everyone who needs it. We who formerly hated and murdered one another now live together and share the same table. We pray for our enemies and try to win those who hate us.” (Justin the Martyr, 100AD – 165AD)

“It is the Christians, O Emperor, who have sought and found the truth, for they acknowledge God…. They show love to their neighbors. They do not do to another what they would not wish to have done to themselves. They speak gently to those who oppress them, and in this way they make them their friends. It has become their passion to do good to their enemies…. This, O Emperor, is the rule of life of the Christians, and this is their manner of life.” (Aristides, written around 137AD)

“For the Gentiles, hearing from our mouth the words of God, are impressed by their beauty and greatness: then, learning that our works are not worthy of the things we say, they turn to railing, saying that it is some deceitful tale. For when they hear from us that God says: ‘No thanks will be due to you, if ye love only those who love you; but thanks will be due to you, if ye love your enemies and those that hate you. When they hear this, they are impressed by the overplus of goodness: but when they see that we do not love, not only those who hate us, but even those who love us, they laugh at us, and the Name is blasphemed.” (The 2nd Epistle of Clement, 140-160AD)

“Say to those that hate and curse you, You are our brothers!” (Theophilus of Antioch, died around 185AD)

“The Christian does not hurt even his enemy.” (Tertullian, 160AD – 220AD)

“None of us offers resistance when he is seized, or avenges himself for your unjust violence, although our people are numerous and plentiful…it is not lawful for us to hate, and so we please God more when we render no requital for injury…we repay your hatred with kindness.” (St. Cyprian, Bishop of Carthage, died 258AD)

“Having cleansed ourselves of all hatred, it is necessary to love even enemies, and, when need be, to sacrifice one’s soul for one’s friends, having the same love as God and his Christ has for us.” (St. Basil the Great, 330–379 AD)

“Thus, in keeping with the commandment to rejoice with those who rejoice and weep with those who weep (Romans 12:15), we must open up our mercy to all the poor and those who suffer for whatever reason; we are to offer people charity, whether they are widowed or orphaned, whether they are driven out of their homeland or oppressed by the rulers, whether they suffer the insolence of their superiors or the inhumanity of tax collectors or the murderous hand of thieves or the greed of robbers or the seizing of estates or shipwrecks. For they all have the same right to our sympathy, and look at our hands just as we look at the hands of God when we ask Him for something.” (St Gregory the Theologian, 329 AD – 390 AD)

Do not love wealth if it does not help the poor. Forgive if you have received forgiveness, and be merciful if you have been pardoned. Acquire human love by human love while you are still alive. May your whole life be renewed. May your paths be made new. (St. Gregory the Theologian, 329 AD – 390 AD)

We learn a lot about what the first followers of Jesus assumed God required of them because of their understanding of what God was like as revealed in Jesus. If we assume that theology maps onto our relationships, I have a question. If someone watched my (your) relationships for a month, where we are ambassadors for God, what would they conclude about my (your) view of God? Is God…

  • Patient or harsh?

  • Generous or stingy?

  • More full of grace or judgment?

  • Slow to anger or quick to anger?

  • Punishment-centered or healing-centered?

  • Callous or kind?

  • Insulting or uplifting?

  • Manipulative or invitational?

  • Domineering or self-giving?

  • Keeping score or canceling debt?

  • Impatient with weakness or patient in formation?

  • Perfectionistic or growth-oriented?

  • Shaming people into change or loving them into it?

The book of Acts – and all of Scripture’s revelation of Jesus - offer an opportunity to assess whether or not we are living in the life Jesus has offered to us. Jesus modeled and taught a path to freedom from the power of sin and evil. He saves us not just from something but to something: a Kingdom characterized by righteousness and holiness. He invites us to join in his restorative plan for the world by demonstrating the beauty of the restoration that only Jesus can bring.

If you would like to put a song on your playlist that reflects this sermon, here it is.