covenant

Harmony #16: The Sabbath Was Made For Us (Matthew 12:1-8; Mark 2:23-28; Luke 6:1-5)

At that time Jesus was going through the grain fields on a Sabbath. His disciples were hungry, and they began to pick some heads of wheat, rub them in their hands, and eat them.[1] But when some of the Pharisees saw this they said to him, “Look, your disciples are doing what is against the law to do on the Sabbath.”

To be clear, the Old Testament does not prohibit this; the disciples were not farmers doing a harvest on the Sabbath. The Pharisees’ objections were based on an oral tradition that had grown in complexity over time.[2] Here we are, back to the old wineskins of tradition. This suggests we are going to learn something new about the Sabbath as opposed to how the Pharisees understood it.

Mark 2:25-26; Matthew 12:4-5 Jesus said to them, “Have you never read what David did when he was in need and he and his companions were hungry— how he entered the house of God when Abiathar was high priest, took and ate the sacred bread,[3] which is against the law for any but the priests to eat, and also gave it to his companions?  Or have you not read in the law that the priests in the temple violate the Sabbath and yet are not guilty?”

Jesus is using a Jewish hero to highlight a clear precedent in the Old Testament:  God’s laws were never meant to stop us from doing good or necessary things. In addition, the priests technically violated the Sabbath by working as they offered sacrifices and did other duties on the Sabbath (Num. 28:910), yet they were considered blameless.[4]

At minimum, Jesus is pointing out that the Pharisees are not consistent with how they understand the Law. At maximum, they have badly missed the point and turned Sabbath observance into something God never intended for it to be.

Matthew 12:6-7; Mark 2:27-28” I tell you that something greater than the temple [Jesus and His Kingdom] [5] is here.If you had known what this means: ‘I want mercy and not sacrifice,’ you would not have condemned the innocent.”Then he said to them, “The Sabbath was made for people, not people for the Sabbath. For this reason the Son of Man is lord even of the Sabbath.”

There was active debate in Judaism concerning how much a person was willing to sacrifice to give honor to God and his holy day. This went beyond the actual act animal sacrifice; this included how much one was willing to hurt: financially, emotionally, physically, etc. It was as if the most holy were the most self-deprived; the ones who were hurt the most by the Sabbath must understand it the best.

The Qumran community was more rigorous than most: “No one should help an animal give birth on the Sabbath day. And if he makes it fall into a well or a pit, he should not take it out on the Sabbath” (CD 11:1314). Even if people fell into water, others were not to take them out by using a ladder or a rope or a utensil (CD 11:1617).[6]

Jesus does not challenge the institution of the Sabbath; Jesus points out the actual intent of the Sabbath—to bring rest and well-being in the context of valuing mercy.[7] The Sabbath was given by God as a gift to us, but the Pharisees had made it a burden at best and a contest at worst.

Luke 6:6-11; Mark 3:1-7a; Matthew 12:9-15a On another Sabbath, after Jesus left that place, he entered the synagogue and was teaching. Now a man was there whose right hand was withered. The experts in the law and the Pharisees watched Jesus closely, and asked him, “Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath?” so they could find a reason to accuse him.

But Jesus knew their thoughts, and said to the man who had the withered hand, “Get up and stand here among all these people.” So he rose and stood there. Then Jesus said to them, “I ask you, is it lawful to do good and heal on the Sabbath or to do evil, to save a life or to destroy it?” But they were silent.

Jesus said to them, “Would not any one of you, if he had one sheep that fell into a pit on the Sabbath, take hold of it and lift it out?[8] How much more valuable is a person than a sheep![9] So it is lawful to do good on the Sabbath.”

After looking around at them all in anger, grieved by the hardness of their hearts, Jesus said to the man, “Stretch out your hand.” He stretched it out, and his hand was restored.[10] But the Pharisees, filled with mindless rage, went out immediately and began debating with one another, plotting with the Herodians against him, as to how they could assassinate him.

Jesus contends that the higher principle on the Sabbath is not abstaining from activity but doing good.[11] The Law has always been for our good and the good of others, to the glory of God. Should our understanding of the commands of God prevent us from flourishing as human beings bearing God’s image, or if our understanding of the Law hinders us from loving God or others well, we are misunderstanding his commands.

I want to take time today to talk about the implications of the Sabbath being made for us. I think the principle Jesus explains here holds true of all of God’s laws that describe righteous living. They are for us. They are intended to help us flourish as God designed us to flourish. The Old Wineskin of the Pharisees was that the yoke of the Law was a harsh burden; the New Wineskin is that the yoke of righteous living is a gift. 

Matthew places the two stories about the Sabbath immediately after Jesus told his disciples,

“My yoke is easy (xrestos,[12] “usefully kind”); my burden is light.” (Matthew 11:30)

Following Jesus means we are yoked with him into his service. It’s an image that a farming community would have understood. We are yoked with Jesus into the Law of Love that, when lived out, looks (in many ways) an awful lot like the moral[13] Law revealed in the Old Testament. While Jesus fulfilled the ceremonial and purity laws, he actually upped the expectations in the moral law[14] while simultaneously stressing it would be kind and easy. So, how does that work?

The Law was given within the context of the overall story of God’s work in the world. The story in which the Law appears begins with Creation, with a God of power and care and personality who pulls order from chaos, light from darkness, mankind from dust, who created a world and called it good.  Part of the goodness was seen in a world of boundaries:  the sea and land had their place; there was a difference between the plant and animal kingdom; there was another division between people and the rest of Creation.  God placed Adam and Eve in garden of paradise, but even that garden had boundaries. 

The goodness became corrupted, however, and the father and mother of humanity learned quickly what we all learn at some point in our lives:  Like everything else in God’s creation, we need boundaries, or we will destroy what is good within and around us.  

Jump ahead in the story of God to the Exodus of God’s chosen people from the land of bondage in Egypt.  It’s almost another creation event: a new nation arises from a land of bondage and spiritual darkness and moral chaos.  And once again, God gives boundaries. 

The story is not taking a new path.  The Old Testament laws given at Mount Sinai were an integral part of the ongoing revelation of a God who specializes in taking things that seem chaotic, and frightening, and oppressive, and making something new.  And that new thing always involves boundaries.

We see in Exodus the echoing of the a similar story line begun in Genesis: order from chaos; light from darkness; a good thing from a bad thing; a story that has continued throughout history, from the biggest of world events to the smallest of individual lives.  God does this over, and over, and over again. 

At Mount Sinai, he offered them a covenant as a groom to a bride. Exodus 24: 7 specifically says the Law was the “Book of the Covenant.”  This Covenant has been compared to a Hebrew marriage ceremony, like a prenuptial agreement that clarifies what our obligations are to God if we choose to covenant with him. The Hebrews would have recognized this as the ketubah, a legal document agreed upon and signed by both parties.  It was a comprehensive summary of the expectations of this covenant relationship explaining the kind of behavior that was consistent with covenant membership. The bride and groom were to be clear about what they were agreeing to enter into, and what it would take for this relationship to work. 

Some translations phrase this God-given ketubah, the Ten Commandments, as, “You will not recognize any other gods….you will not take the name of the Lord in vain…you will not kill. “  Future tense.  God seemed to be saying,  “If you want to covenant with me, this is what this covenant will look like.”  It was as if God, the groom, was saying,  “Do you, Israel, take me, to have and to hold, from the day on, for better…worse… rich…poor... in sickness and in health…”  And Israel responded, “We do.”

The Law was not given as a means of salvation, but as a gift from a gracious God to allow His people to know Him better and to flourish in their design and their relationship with God.

The Hebrew people embraced this revelation. It put ethical, Godly living directly within reach of the most ordinary of people. David places the law alongside Creation as one of the great declarations of God:

“The law of the LORD is perfect, reviving the soul. The statutes of the LORD are trustworthy, making wise the simple. The precepts of the LORD are right, giving joy to the heart. 
The commands of the LORD are radiant, giving light to the eyes. They are more precious than gold, they are sweeter than honey…” (Psalm 19:7-10)

Think of this maybe as an instruction manual. They come with almost everything you buy if it has any complexity at all. “Use it this way and things will go well; use it that way and you will break it and probably whatever it is you are working on.”                                                              

The Israelites were called to live a particular way that, when understood and lived rightly, would bring wisdom, joy, and insight. In addition to this individual benefit, keeping Law was a means of showing the character of God to the rest of the world (Duet. 4:5-8):

“ See, I have taught you decrees and laws as the LORD my God commanded me, so that you may follow them in the land you are entering to take possession of it. Observe them carefully, for this will show your wisdom and understanding to the nations, who will hear about all these decrees and say, "Surely this great nation is a wise and understanding people."  What other nation is so great as to have their gods near them the way the LORD our God is near us whenever we pray to him? And what other nation is so great as to have such righteous decrees and laws as this body of laws I am setting before you today?”

Jesus himself made clear in the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5) the power of obedient living as a means of evangelism. Jesus told his audience:

“You are the light of the world… let your light shine before people, so that they can see your good deeds and give honor to your Father in heaven.”

Immediately, he follows that up with this:

“Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets. I have not come to abolish these things but to fulfill them.18 I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth pass away not the smallest letter or stroke of a letter will pass from the law until everything takes place… 19  whoever obeys them and teaches others to do so will be called great in the kingdom of heaven.”

When righteous deeds follow transformed hearts, people will see those good works and glorify God. Love-inspired obedience is a fantastic witness to the goodness and wisdom of God. God’s revelation of Himself and His way was always meant to benefit the world, not just the individuals who love and follow Him.

  • Because God was compassionate, they were to show compassion.

  • Because God was generous, they were to be generous.

  • Because God forgave them, they were to forgive others.

  • Because God loved them, they were to love their spouse or kids or neighbors.

Righteous actions and godly living was never reduced merely to what one person’s life looked like; it was always understood in the context of community and the world. How will our Godly or ungodly decisions effect the world around us? Will it bring order or chaos? Life or death?

Time after time, the Old Testament showed that if the people forgot God and went after other gods, their society would be characterized by injustice, oppression, cruelty and excess. The principle is one that transcends times and cultures: If you choose the wrong God, you get the wrong society. This pattern seems clear in world history.

  • When our gods are constantly at war, we generally turn to  violence for problem-solving; we see those who have the ability to be effectively and proficiently violent as heroes.

  • When our gods are all about sex, we tend to associate “the good life” with good sex and base our identity/worth in our sexiness (the degree to which others desire us).

  • When we worship gods of wealth, the only “good life” is the rich life, and greed and exploitation flourish as we willingly sacrifice those around us in the pursuit of the almighty dollar.

  • When we worship gods of luxury, we associate comfort and pleasure with the “good life,” and we demand these things as a right as we order our lives around them.

  • When we worship gods of power, we will loved manipulation and control above all else and see the acquisition of power as the answer to the world’s problems as well as our own.

  • When we worship gods of freedom/independence, we eventually demanded radical unaccountability to anyone but ourselves so that we can “do that which is right in our own eyes.”[15]

  The god you choose will be reflected in the culture, because the people’s priorities always reflect the priorities of their gods. Here are a few examples to make my point.

1. In many of the cultures surrounding the Hebrews, possessions were of more worth than human life. One’s life was forfeit for theft or property damage; if the people wanted a good crop harvest, they killed other people. Gods of corn and stone idols required the elevation of corn and stone, not the people around them.  Not in Israel.  Possessions never were more important than life, because one of those things was created in the image of God, and it wasn’t the property.  So theft required restitution, not death; bad crops were never cause to kill people (or anything). If you choose the wrong God, you get the wrong set of cultural priorities.

2. The French Revolution was a decidedly atheistic, humanistic attempt to change the world.  Voltaire, one of the fathers of the movement, had a statue of Diana, the Goddess of Reason in his home.  The results were disastrous. When Madame Roland was brought to the guillotine in 1792 on false charges, she bowed mockingly toward the statue of liberty in Place de la Revolution and said, “Liberty, what crimes are committed in your name.”[16] If you choose the wrong God, you destroy liberty and freedom.

3. Hitler, ironically, referred to the law given to the Jewish nation as the “life-denying 10 Commandments.”  In the process of trying to eradicate the chosen people of the “tyrannical God” whose commands robbed people of life, he experimented on and slaughtered millions of people he considered sub-human. The legacy of Nazi eugenics and racism has lived on around the world in many terrible ways over the decades since, always at the expense of the value, dignity and too often the life of people. If you choose the wrong God, you get a false view of the value of human life.

4. Alfred Kinsey, who has set the tone of sexual discussion in the 1950’s, viewed humans not as people who bore God’s image, but as little more than animals. When he researched human sexuality, he expected to find that people behaved like animals, and (surprise!) he did. Perhaps that is why the closing credits in the 2004 film “Kinsey,” a film meant to celebrate the man who liberated us from all the old-fashioned Jude-Christian prudishness about sex, show nature films of animals copulating in the background. If you choose the wrong God, you get a false view of sexuality.

This list could go on and on. How we feel about God has implications far beyond living a personally ethical life and feeling good about our decisions.  Worship has a ripple effect. Nothing exists in a vacuum, especially our moral choices. 

Perhaps that is why there is an order to the commands:  The first four are about God, the last six about people. If you begin with a correct view of God, you end with a correct view of people. It’s the same order Jesus gave:  “Love the Lord…love your neighbors.” As Lauren Winner notes inReal Sex:

“The Mosaic law does…protective work, pointing to, guarding, and returning God’s people to the created order, the world as God meant it to be…To see the Biblical witness as an attempt to direct us to the created order…is to recognize the true goodness of God’s creation…the law cares for us and protects us, written by a lawgiver who understands that life outside of God’s created intent destroys us.  Life lived inside the contours of God’s law harmonizes us and makes us beautiful.  It makes us creatures living well in the created order.  It gives us the opportunity to become who we are meant to be.”

Just as the Sabbath was made to serve us, God’s righteous boundaries serve us as an instruction manual from the Creator that shows what is good. It gives us the opportunity to become, with God’s help, the kind of faithfully present image bearers He intends for us to be.

If I would call you to something this morning, it’s this: Remember that the Creator’s ‘owners manual’ about who you are and how you are designed to live is for our good. It is for us.  Obedience does not in itself bring us salvation; that work was done by Jesus on the cross. Being yoked with Jesus into living out the Law of Love is God’s design for us to find and to bring flourishing life to the world, for our good and the glory of the One who has shown us what it means to truly live.

__________________________________________________________________________________

[1] At least one Galilean, Rabbi Yehuda, was in agreement with Jesus and permitted rubbing grain in the hands on the Sabbath. This may be an example of a rift between Galilean rabbis and Jerusalem rabbis. (NIV First Century Study Bible)

[2] ESV Reformation Study Bible

[3] Twelve loaves of bread were baked and placed in the tabernacle each Sabbath as an offering. The bread was to be eaten by the priests (Lev. 24:5–9). (ESV Global Study Bible)

[4] Believer’s Bible Commentary

[5] So what is the “something  greater than the temple”?

· It’s Jesus, Immanuel (“God with us”), is the true temple, to whom the symbol pointed (John 1:142:21).. Jesus as Lord of the Sabbath fulfills all aspects of the meaning of the Sabbath (Col. 2:1617).[5]

·The kingdom of God.[5] The Sabbath is a symbol of God’s sovereignty over the whole created universe (Ex. 20:8). It is a reminder of His redemption of His people (Deut. 5:12), and it is a representation of the hope of eternal rest that begins spiritually now and extends into eternity

· Both. It’s the kingdom Jesus is inaugurating as the one who ushers in the Messianic Age.  (Expositor’s Bible Commentary)

[6] Zondervan Illustrated Bible Backgrounds Of The New Testament

[7] ESV Global Study Bible

[8] The Dead Sea Scrolls community specifically prohibited removing an animal from a pit on the Sabbath. It’s possible Jesus was directly challenging their interpretation. (NIV First Century Study Bible)

[9] Jesus seems to have been employing a rabbinic teaching technique called qal v’homer (“light then heavy”). This system of logic pitted one idea against another by using the phrase “how much more.” (Ibid)

[10] It is worthy of remark, that as the man was healed with a word, without even a touch, the Sabbath was unbroken, even according to their most rigid interpretation of the letter of the law. (Adam Clarke)

[11] NIV Grace and Truth Study Bible

[12] Fun fact: It "appears as a spelling variant for the unfamiliar Christus (Xristos).” (HELPS Word Studies) 

[13] Largely distinct from ceremonial and purity laws….sermon for another time.

[14] From Matthew 5: 21 “You have heard that it was said to the people long ago, ‘You shall not murder, and anyone who murders will be subject to judgment.’ 22 But I tell you that anyone who is angry with a brother or sister will be subject to judgment… 27 “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’ 28 But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart….38 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’ 39 But I tell you, do not resist an evil person... 43 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighborand hate your enemy.’ 44 But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.”

[15] Judges 21:25

[16] Peter had to warn the new church pretty quickly: “Don’t use your freedom as an excuse to do evil.” (1 Peter 2:16)

The Replay (John 4:7-5:5)

John is about to go into a summary section. In it, he kind of weaves in and out of several themes, specifically the importance of Jesus and his atonement for our sins and the importance of loving each other. For the sake of addressing these topics in a way that focuses on one at a time, I am reshuffling them. So the order of paragraphs is different than the text, but it’s still the text. First, let’s talk about Jesus.

1 John 4:7 My loved ones, let us devote ourselves to loving one another. Love comes straight from God, and everyone who loves is born of God and truly knows God. Anyone who does not love does not know God, because God is love. 

Because of this, the love of God is a reality among us: God sent His only Son into the world so that we could find true life through Him. 10 This is the embodiment of true love: not that we have loved God first, but that He loved us and sent His Son to become an atoning sacrifice for our sins. 

13 How can we be sure that He truly lives in us and that we truly live in Him? By one fact: He has given us His Spirit. 14 We have watched what God has done, and we stand ready to provide eyewitness testimonies to the reality that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the world15 If anyone unites with our confession that Jesus is God’s own Son, then God truly lives in that person and that person lives in God. 

1 John 5:4 Everything that has been fathered by God overcomes the corrupt world. This is the victory that has conquered the world: our faith. Who is the person conquering the world? It is the one who truly trusts that Jesus is the Son of God.

 Last week John said: get Jesus right. Embrace that he is fully God and fully human, the Word become flesh. Here John comes back to the same thing Paul was so adamant about: Jesus’s death is what provides the payment for our sins. 

In theological circles this is called penal substitution. Just like our prisons are called the penal system because there is penalty involved, this has to do with those of us who were in prison, slaves to sin and doomed for death. So, all of us. Jesus paid penalty we deserve when he died on the cross so we could be freed from the prison of our own making. 

Why a cross? Here’s where we talk about covenant. 

In the Ancient Near East, there was a thing called a suzerain covenant. A stronger party – the suzerain - initiated a covenant relationship with the weaker party.[1] In order to understand atonement theology, or penal substitution, we need to look at God’s suzerain covenant with Abraham.

When God made a covenant with Abraham in Genesis 15, (you get more details through chapter 22), God promised to bless the world through Abraham. This will happen in a number of ways, but it has traditionally been seen as a most importantly a foreshadowing of Jesus. There were only two stipulations for Abraham: leave his home/the gods of his fathers and follow God, and be obedient to the voice of God (Genesis 22).[2]

In a classic ritual that sounds weird to us but wasn’t to them, Abraham killed some animals, cut them in half, and arranged them to walk through. This was a Covenant Of The Pieces that contained a warning: that kind of penalty awaited the covenant breaker. A great darkness fell, and God, the stronger party, passed through the dissected animals (as a blazing torch) but never made Abraham, the weaker party, do the same.

By passing through the slaughtered animal, God was saying that if He didn’t bless Abraham and honor the covenant, God – the stronger, initiating party - would have to pay the penalty. That alone would be unusual, but that wasn’t the most incredible point. God was saying that if Abraham and his descendants didn’t keep the covenant, God would pay the penalty for them. 

Fast forward several thousand years. 

Abraham and his descendants had one job –well, two: leave other gods and be obedient to God. When God initiated another covenant with Moses, all the details got a lot clearer in the giving of the Law. It did not go well. The prophets had a loooooot of bad news to convey about just how badly this was going.  If you’ve seen the Lord Of The Rings movies, there is this eerie start where the music is foreboding, and “men desire power,” and chaos reigns, and Middle Earth just goes off the rails as they wait for the Return of a King[3] who will make things right. That’s an Old Testament kind of epic. 

Somebody has to pay the penalty for Abraham’s descendants breaking the covenant

·      If nobody does, what’s the point of covenant if it has no punch?  

·      If Abraham and his descendants do, what was the point of the promise that God would pay it for all parties? 

We see God fulfill his covenantal duty and pay the penalty for Abraham in the death of the incarnate Jesus. On the cross, a great darkness descends again, and Jesus, the Light of the World, fulfills the conditions of the covenant. What was represented by the death of those animals thousands of years earlier was done to him. Jesus was Yahweh, the Covenant Maker and Covenant Keeper.

We Christians, now, are the children of Abraham (“Those who have faith are children of Abraham.” – Galatians 3:7). And we, too, have done a terrible job keeping the covenant stipulations we have been given in the New Covenant that started with Jesus. The reality that “the wages of sin is death”[4] must be honored. Someone must pay for our breaking of the covenant. 

But “the gift of God is eternal life,”[5] and we commemorate how that penalty was paid by Jesus every time we partake in communion – His body broken, His blood spilled. “Do this in remembrance of me…remember his death[6]…”

The sacrifice that fulfilled the stipulations of an old covenant simultaneously took care of the inevitable failures of the new covenant makers. Because of Jesus’ death and resurrection, even flawed covenant makers are seen by God as flawless covenant keepers. This is what we celebrate when we take COMMUNION together.

* * * * *

John’s second point in his summary: When we are in communion with God, we are also incommunity that ought to be characterized by the love God modeled. True communion with God builds true community with others.  

11 So, my loved ones, if God loved us so sacrificially, surely we should love one another12 No one has ever seen God with human eyes; but if we love one another, God truly lives in us; God’s love has accomplished its mission among us

If I understand this correctly, the closest we will get to seeing God on this side of heaven is when we love each other as Jesus intended, and God truly lives in us. When we pray, “God is just want to know you real,” one of the primary ways God intends for this to be confirmed is by the way in which His children pass on the love of the Father. 

19 We love because He has first loved us. 20 If someone claims, “I love God,” but hates his brother or sister, then he is a liar. Anyone who does not love a brother or sister, whom he has seen, cannot possibly love God, whom he has never seen. 21 He gave us a clear command, that all who love God must also love their brothers and sisters. 

Everyone who trusts Jesus as the long-awaited Anointed One is a child of God, and everyone who loves the Father cannot help but love the child fathered by Him. Then how do we know if we truly love God’s children? We love them if we love God and keep His commandsYou see, to love God means that we keep His commands, and His commands don’t weigh us down.

God’s love reaches the end of its mission when we enter into right(eous) relationship with others as a result of Jesus restoring us to right(eous) relationship with God.[7]  There is no such thing as a truly transformative experience of God’s love that does not result in love for his people manifested by obedience to God’s word.[8] We love others best when we love them as God commands. That’s the most obvious sign that the Holy Spirit is the wind in our sails.[9]#lastweek’smessage

When this happens, God is now ‘seen’ in the world through his family (v.11-12). We are his “body.” He is the head;[10] we make up the rest.  And when we pass on to others the love He has given to us, the mission of His love reaches the fullness of its expression[11] in obvious, profound and breath-taking sacrifice.[12] The ground should be littered with what’s been pouring out of us spiritually as we have been broken and spilled out for those around us. 

So now we can begin to understand John's concern for love and unity in the church.  This isn’t one of the extras one orders for church like the extra features when you get a new car. This is something without which there is no car. First-century Jewish writers were adamant about this: 

“And it is impossible that the invisible God can be piously worshipped by those people who behave with impiety toward those who are visible and near to them.”[13] 

* * * * *

There is a movement of people leaving the church today in what is being called “deconversion.” Some are leaving evangelicalism (“exvangelical”). Some are leaving white evangelicalism (#leaveloud) because of ongoing frustrations with how the legacy and on going reality of racism is (or isn’t) being addressed. (More on this next week). When people leave, it is rarely as simple as having been wooed away. There are three primary reasons (not the only ones, to be sure) that show up over and over again:

·      they feel deeply wounded in some fashion

·      they don’t feel safe wrestling honestly with life

·      they feel[14] actively pushed away by terrible teaching, harsh people, or both

 I don’t think I know anyone who has deconverted or become an exvangelical simply because something else caught their eye. The theme I hear over and over through personal conversation or through testimony online is the aftermath of disillusionment, frustration, and pain not just experienced in church but brought on by church, and it almost always has to do with not having the love of Christ passed on well.

We talk a lot about the dangers the church faces by getting sucked into culture, and that’s absolutely valid. But remember how John’s earlier focus on “antichrists” wasn’t outside the church? In fact, nothing in the book has warned Christians about the dangers lurking outside. It’s all been about how things can go wrong inside the church and shipwreck our faith. 

Here’s my summary of why so many people are leaving right now (not a Bible verse…it’s my way of trying to summarize). A bad thing looks better than it deserves if a good thing looks worse than it should.  I mean, if you give me a choice between shrimp and grits (the church) and liver and onions (the world), I’m only choosing the liver and onions if the shrimp and grits are nasty. 

So what’s the solution?

Jesus entered into our world to show that he was qualified to be an empathetic advocate for us.[15] This meant a number of things: 

·      he “saw” people[16] (loaded word)

·      he listened and thoughtfully responded (the Rich Young Ruler[17]; the woman who touched his garment[18]; the woman caught in adultery[19])

·      he spent time with them (that crazy ‘friend of sinners’[20], an insult Jesus embraced). 

·      He invited himself into their homes (Zaccheus[21]).

·      He went to their unclean neighborhoods (Woman at the Well in Samaria[22]).

·      he spent 33 years on earth in our neighborhood, during which time “he had to be made like his brothers in every respect, so that he might become a merciful and faithful high priest in the service of God, to make propitiation for the sins of the people. For because he himself has suffered when tempted, he is able to help those who are being tempted.” (Hebrews 2:17-18)

When we are promised an empathetic advocate, we know we have one. He didn't sit in the heavens are read about what it was like to be human; he became human. 

When we ‘enter into the world’ of others, we model the example of Jesus.  We see; we listen; we spend time together; we seek to understand so that we might be faithfully and lovingly present in attitude, action, and word. 

And when we do this, church life becomes very, very compelling. Imagine being part of a group of people who are committed to knowing you, understanding you, loving you, being poured out for you in honor of Jesus, who was poured out for us.[23] 

11 So, my loved ones, if God loved us so sacrificially, surely we should love one another12 No one has ever seen God with human eyes; but if we love one another, God truly lives in us; God’s love has accomplished its mission among us.

 
_____________________________________________________________________________

[1] Genesis 15-22; Deuteronomy 29 and 30

[2] On the other hand, there were at least 14 very specific promises that God puts on himself. http://www.lifeinmessiah.org/resources/articles/gods-covenant-with-abraham

[3] Please give me bonus points for LOTR references..

[4] Romans 6:23

[5] Still Romans 6:23 J

[6] 1 Corinthians 11:24-26

[7] Colossians 1:20-22; 2 Corinthians 5:18; Romans 5:10

[8] “The connecting lines of thought are not on the surface, and cannot be affirmed with certainty. What follows seems to give the clue to what otherwise looks like an abrupt transition. ‘I say we must love one another, for by so doing we have proof of the presence of the invisible God.’” (Cambridge Bible For Schools And Colleges)

[9] See Paul’s opinion on this in 1 Corinthians 13

[10] Colossians 1:18; Colossians 2:18-19; Ephesians 1:20-23; Ephesians 5:23-30; 1 Corinthians 12:27.

[11] Our love for God is no greater than our love for “the least of these.” 

[12] We are never intended to be terminals of God’s blessings, like those things electricians use to stop the progress of the electricity going through wires; we were intended to be conduits or channels the keep the love from the source moving along. Think of spokes in a bicycle tire: as they get nearer to the center of the wheel, they get nearer to one another. (Believers Bible Commentary)

[13]  Thanks to Zondervan Illustrated Bible Background of the New Testament for some great ideas here. 

[14] “Feel” is a key word. Maybe they projected something into a situation…but maybe they didn’t, too.

[15] Hebrews 4:15  “For we do not have a high priest who is unable to empathize (literally, “to have a fellow feeling with” in both Strong’s and the NAS Exhaustive Concordance; Thayer’s Greek Lexicon says “to be affected with the same feeling as another”) with our weaknesses, but we have one who has been tempted in every way, just as we are--yet he did not sin.” (NIV)  The NIV gets it right here. Though the word is often translated as ‘sympathetic,’ the best English equivalent is ‘empathetic’.

[16] Matthew 5:1; 9:36, for example

[17] Mark 10

[18] Matthew 9

[19] John 8:1-11

[20] Matthew 11: 16-19 & John 8: 1-11

[21] Luke 19

[22] John 4

[23] Philippians 2:8

Roots And Fruits (Part 3): 2 Timothy 3:1-8

Love consists in this: not that we loved God, but that He loved us and sent His Son to be the propitiation for our sins." (1 John 4:10) 

 "But God proves His own love for us in that while we were still sinners Christ died for us!" (Romans 5:8).

 

Our advent focus to day is love. A key way God has shown is love and care to the world is by establishing covenants with humanity, covenants which culminated in Jesus. As we look at the heart of the toxic dysfunction in Timothy’s church, we will see Paul focus a spotlight on the heart of the problem: the mockery and rejection of covenant. [1]

_________________________________________________________

  

 We live in a consumer culture. We basically say, “If you please me, I will reward you.” If my garbage doesn’t get picked up, I’m getting a new collector.  If another phone company is cheaper and better, I’m switching.  It's just business. It’s entirely conditional.  If I don't like the product, I move on. A consumer culture is a throw-away culture. 

This is not necessarily bad, but it becomes bad when we begin to treat people from a consumer perspective. We can say to our friends, family or spouses: “If you please me, I will reward you. I’ll be good only if you provide something good.” It’s a CONSUMER approach to relationships.  It’s entirely conditional. If people don’t give us what we want, we dump them and move on. A consumer culture is a throw-away culture. This leads to disaster. 

·      If you think you are being consumed you will never be free to openly admit failures and flaws. 

·      If you think you are being consumed, you will feel a desperate need to impress.

·      If you are the consumer, no one will ever fill you sufficiently, and you will move from person to person like a relational vampire. 

 

The gods of the ANE were CONSUMER gods. Even the pagan creation stories said that the gods created humanity to feed and take care of them. If Zeus tired of them sufficiently, he would dump them and move on. Even worse, they weren’t entirely sure what pleased the gods, so there was the tremendous insecurity, which lead to desperate working to please as many gods in as many ways as possible so that they would be rewarded.

The Hebrew God did not relate to humanity as a consumer God. Yahweh was a covenant God.[2] A COVENANT relationship was more than a casual decision. It was meant to bind people together in a way that could not be separated.  This was not a CONSUMER relationship based on feelings and started or stopped on a whim. Two people recognized that they wanted to fasten their lives together. “Two parties make binding promises to each other and work together to reach a common goal.”[3] 

 There was not guesswork, no fear of whims and “Did I make them happy?”  A covenant brought the stabilization of commitment. A COVENANT says: “I will be faithful.”[4]   

 The closest equivalent we have today of a covenant between equals is what we think marriageought to be (though it could apply to close friends and family members as well). 

A marriage covenant is not just a casual relationship that forms or continues on a whim: it involves two parties with a desire to have their lives closely bound together, so there is relationship. But it is also sealed with an oath. It put backbone in the commitment, otherwise the agreement was worthless.  

·      It’s not less loving because it binds with a vow; it’s more loving.  

·      It's not less binding because it’s approached with emotion and love; it’s more binding. 

Marriage will fail with consumers; it will thrive with covenanters. So a COVENANT relationship of this kind is very different from a CONSUMER relationship.  

With that in mind, we get to the last three items in Paul’s list of bad fruit coming from bad roots as found in 2 Timothy 3:1-8. It’s the center of the list; we are getting to the heart of things. In, fact, I’m shifting the tree image here. 

 On my left is the Tree Of The Knowledge Of Good And Evil, the tree where the first covenant God made with mankind was broken. On my right is Cross, the Tree of Life, where the forgiveness for these sins occurred when the final Covenant was established by Jesus. I bring this image up because when Paul gets to the heart of the bad roots and fruits, it has to do with covenant-breaking. If we are going to contrast it properly, we must look at covenant-keeping, and that is found perfectly in Jesus and on the cross. 

 The first in the final triad Paul offers is those who are “ uncaring, coldhearted; without natural affection.” 

“Careless and regardless of the welfare of those connected with them by ties of blood, like spouses, parents and children. Plato says, ‘A child loves his parents, and is loved by them;’ and so, according to St. Paul's judgment in 1 Timothy 5:8, were "worse than infidels." – Pulpit Commentary

 Those who by nature they should be most closely tied are the ones from whom they have no natural affection. Remember, they are in the church, so they knew the following:

·      With spouses, they have made a covenant. 

·      With their parents, they owe the honor. 

·      With their kids, they owe them loving care. 

 

But they just don’t have this. They don’t care about the storge (“natural affection”) they ought to have for their own flesh and blood. I think this works as both an observation about the ripple effect of sin and a concern about how we choose to respond to it. 

The observation: Perhaps they have were raised in the kind of family that tended to sever all feelings of natural affection. They didn't ask for that, and yet that is the ring that has been given to them. #LOTR. Okay. They were sinned against, and they bear the scars. That’s just a terrible thing in and of itself. If you struggle with natural affection, you might be reaping the sin someone else sowed in your life.

 Now the concern: What have they done with that? I see at least four responses.

·      Option #1: They address it. This is the best case scenario. They are now in the church. They claim to be followers of God. Have they brought this part of their life to Christ and His church for healing, forgiveness against the perpetrators, and maybe even (hopefully) restoration? Because Jesus can do that kind of miraculous stuff. 

·      Option #2: They don’t address it head on, but at least they are motivated by it to do something good. “Well, that didn’t go well, but it’s water under the burned bridge. Nothing to do about it now. We will just live our separate lives, but I will not pass on that legacy to my family.” It’s not ideal –ideally they are finding peace and restoration with those who wounded them -  but at least they made a conscious decision to try to make life better for their family than the life they were given. 

·      Option #3: They ignore it. “It was fine. It was fine.”  Dude, you guys scream at each other and somebody gets punched every time more than 5 of you are in a room. “That’s just what families do.”  No, it’s not. “Oh, relax.” And then by ignoring it, they fall right back into patterns they were given, and the sins of the fathers will be passed on for generations.

·      Option #4: Worst case scenario is that they embrace it. They see the dysfunction and in some sense thrive in it. Maybe conflict is an adrenaline rush. Maybe shame feels like home. Maybe secretly despising others feels good after a while. Maybe they’ve learned that manipulation and bullying and cold-heartedness is power, and they love power.

The second thing Paul mentions is slanderers/false-accusers; the word is diabolos. Commentaries will tell you it’s people who a) have no regard for truth and b) like quarrels. In other words, they love to stir the pot not for any noble reason like the pursuit of truth, but for one of the most ignoble ones: they just love the conflict, and they’ve discovered that you can get conflict rolling pretty quickly with meanness and lies. 

This one sent a shiver down my back when I read it: diablos. The devil is among you. He’s not only “out there” in a dark, cold world, crouching by our doors and seeking to devour us. He’s right here. The devil is subtle. People in the church – remember, this is people in the church - who have no regard for the truth…. 

·      aren’t interested in seeing God as God actually is. They want a tame lion, a God of their making and choosing. 

·      don’t want to know what the Bible actually says. They want to know what they can get the Bible to say. 

·      don’t want to hear your side of the story. They don’t want to get to know you to better understand you. 

·      don’t want to see the Big Picture, or walk in another person’s shoes. 

 

They just aren’t interested in truth or peace. No wonder they like quarrels. Keep in mind this isn’t disagreements in pursuit of truth. They aren’t interested in truth. They pick quarrels to show off, or get their way, or embarrass or manipulate you, or get attention, or undermine a group.   

Finally, we get to the core around which those two things were tightly wrapped. These are what I will call covenant mockers. They are…

“’without libation.’ Aspondos is an adjective which is the negation of spondē, a libation-sacrifice used for making treaties and covenants.” – HELPS Word Studies 

Those unwilling to embrace bonds of treaty or covenant….one who will make no truce or treaty with his enemy.” – Pulpit  Commentary.  

 

They are despisers of covenant: not making them if they can help it, and breaking them if they find themselves in them.

·      They don’t want the responsibility of responsibility. 

·      They don’t want to owe anything to anyone. 

·      No boundaries, nor restraints, no obligations. 

·      No forgiveness; no obedience; no loyalty; no being a team player or being part of something bigger than themselves. 

·      No “I’ve got your back” or “we’re in this together. 

 

It’s the summary of everything we’ve read so far.  It’s the ultimate narcissist, the one who thinks the world revolves around them, who believes others exist to be used or consumed for our happiness, who will sacrifice everyone around them but never themselves. 

“Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers. Or, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, another triad which starts from another breach of the same fifth commandment, the rending of the family ties of love, and advances to a breach of the sixth commandment in a refusal to make peace, and further of the ninth commandment in… attacks and slanders. The threefold contrary spirit is in the same Sermon on the Mount, Luke 6:27, ‘love your enemies, do good to them that hate you, bless them that curse you.’ – Cambridge Bible For Schools And Colleges

 

Back to the arrival of covenant-making and covenant-keeping God, where Jesus models in his death what he taught in his life: “‘love your enemies, do good to them that hate you, bless them that curse you.’

God made a covenant with Abraham in Genesis 15; he said that He would bless the world through the descendants of Abraham. Abraham just needed to be obedient. God used a standard form of suzerain covenant-making.[5]  Abraham killed some animals, cut them in pieces, and arranged them to walk through.  While they were waiting, great darkness fell.  God passed through (as a fiery pillar) – but never made Abraham do the same.

By passing through the slaughtered animal, God was saying that if He didn’t bless Abraham and honor the covenant and indeed bless the world, God would have to pay the penalty. That alone would be unusual, but that wasn’t the most incredible point. God was saying that if Abraham didn’t keep the covenant, God would pay the penalty for Abraham. 

Which God did in the person of Jesus Christ. On the cross, a great darkness descends once again, and Jesus fulfilled the conditions of the covenant by paying the penalty of the covenant-breaking done by Abraham and his covenant descendants. We commemorate this every time we partake in communion – His body broken, His blood spilled. The covenant must be honored. Someone must pay for breaking the agreement.

Because of his death and resurrection, even flawed covenant keepers are seen by God as flawless covenant keepers. 

“Christ redeemed us from the curse by becoming the curse so the blessing of Abraham could come to us all by Jesus Christ.” (Galatians 3:13) 

This is love: not that we loved God, but that he loved us and sent his Son as an atoning sacrifice for our sins.”  1 John 4:10

We celebrate the birth of Christ on Christmas. That was step one in the covenant Jesus offered. Why did Jesus come? “Mark 10:45 "For even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life a ransom for many."

Born to die. It’s an odd tension in Christmas. “Joy to the world; the Lord has come”…to die, to give His life so that others may live, to fulfill the covenant established with Abraham (Romans 15:8-9; Galatians 3).

In this season of Advent that celebrates His birth, we also celebrate the fulfillment of His purpose: His death, the power of which was confirmed by His resurrection.

"Love consists in this: not that we loved God, but that He loved us and sent His Son to be the propitiation for our sins." (1 John 4:10)

 

 

THREE QUESTIONS

  1.  How have you seen consumer culture impact you either in your habits or your relationships? How would embracing covenant culture change the way you live?

  2. How are you doing with the “natural affection” for family? What makes it hard? What does it look like to move away from #4 and toward #1 in the list of responses? How can your group pray for you in this area?

  3. ‘Diablos’ is a sobering word. Based on the description in these notes, what is the opposite? What are some practical ways in which living out the opposite could impact our families, friendships, church and culture?

 

________________________________________________________________________________

[1] In the Old Testament, it’s captured by the word hesed. Hesed is variously translated "steadfast love," "loving kindness," "mercy or mercies," "goodness." In several passages it is a term used to describe the character of Yahweh. For example, when Moses was summoned to Mt. Sinai the second time to receive the tablets of the covenant, the Lord passed before him and proclaimed,"Jahweh, Jahweh,a God merciful and gracious, slow to anger, and abounding in steadfast love (hesed) and faithfulness, keeping steadfast love for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, but who will by no means clear the guilty, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children and the children's children, to the third and fourth generations" (Exodus 34:6-7).

[2]  Find a podcast/sermon called “A Covenant Relationship” by Tim Keller.

[3] So much good stuff on this from The Bible Project. https://bibleproject.com/blog/covenants-the-backbone-bible/

[4] David and Jonathan’s covenant of friendship in 1 Samuel 18 is a good example. 

1)    Exchanged coats (care)

2)    Exchanged weapon belts (protection)

3)    Sacrificed an animals (importance)

4)    Mingled blood (connection)

5)    Mingled names (reputation)

6)    Shared bread (hospitality)

7)    Planted a tree (visible reminder)

 

[5] Interestingly, there were only two stipulations for Abraham: leave his home/the gods of his fathers and follow God, and be obedient to the voice of God (Genesis 22). On the other hand, there were at least 14 very specific promises that God puts on himself (http://www.lifeinmessiah.org/resources/articles/gods-covenant-with-abraham)